OMG Pfizer release adverse events data - insane!!!!

Yep.

Official #'s show a 99.94% survival rate if you're under the age of 65.

Things like obesity, diabetes, existing immune system problems, existing cancer, etc. can increase the risk of death, but that's true of any other disease not just COVID.

The thing that should really stick out like a sore thumb to everyone, whether they believe in these mRNA jabs or not, is that NOT ONCE did you ever see the government tell people to:

1. Lose weight if they're obese
2. Eat clean healthy foods
3. Supplement with known proven immune system vitamins/minerals like liposomal vitamin C, zinc, selenium, etc.

Couple that with the fierce opposition to even consider or try other treatments like HCQ or ivermectin.

Just those 3 simple things above should tell everyone that this whole COVID bullshit fiasco has had nothing to do people's health.

Learn as you go. Yep, science alright. A science experiment.

Cost = human life

No biggie

Nope. Just an old school GLPER and researcher tired of lazy ass OPs who post links without any relevant information or discussion points.

.

Harms over three times more women than men

3% of 1 is 0.03.

That's 1/33.

Now stop being a math tard!

Grossly understated. Sometimes they do that to make it appear that they're coming clean, but they're not.

bullshit, there is plenty we can do ... we can stop the experiment, take all the vaccines off the shelves, and prepare for the worst

no more "privileges" for the vaxxed they should all be quarantined and given Hospice care - crematoriums should be doubled or tripled, and the vaxxed bodies burned

no more "mandates" or restrictions for the healthy, no mask, no social distancing and no more lockdowns

Also remember cdc corrected the number of covid deaths with no comorbidities to 6% in 2020.

This table shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death.

How to gin up a civil war, so you, Government, can then holler to the U.N. troops to come in, who then break into our homes and shoot us.

We know the drill.

Get ‘er done.

In the absence of firepower, a screwdriver to the temple will work.

But, you stupid bastard, you VOLUNTEER for the jab, then Darwin was right.

rough math last Spring made it clear it was safer to get "covid" than the jab

.

Real report:

[link to phmpt.org (secure)]

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
This nonprofit, made up of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists exists solely to obtain and disseminate the data relied upon by the FDA to license COVID-19 vaccines. The organization takes no position on the data other than that it should be made publicly available to allow independent experts to conduct their own review and analyses. Any data received will be made public on this website.

That is odd that is the exact same reply you posted on another pinned thread
Well this is some home work for you look up if any government can legally impede the Constitutional right of any citizen to exert legal action or legal defence

Guys, the most important part of the information is missing here

Those 42.000 AE's and 1200 deaths were per how many jabs?

I couldn't find the data in the report, anybody knows?

Or maybe we could calculate this. If we know it was the month of February 2021 we can check how many jabs were administerd by then?

We cancelled clinical trials in previous decades with mortalities less than 25 total.

These "vaccines" would not be considered safe in any other political climate.

Amazing! Practically the same rate as being completely unvaccinated. Why bother?

Most of us could recite the the numerous side effects that are possible with these drugs, from the dozen or so ads that run on TV every minute of every day.

They're all the same.

My Mom and I used to laugh at the ridiculousness of it all, especially when they would list seizures and/or death as one of them.

Derp.

And there ALWAYS seems to be a follow-up legal commercial, that says "if you or a loved one has suffered from any of these side effects or died as a result of taking *insert drug name here,* call 1-800- yada-yada for compensation."

HOW THE HELL can you call anyone, if you're in a coma or dead??

Did ANY of the vaxxtards ever notice or question the fact that these drug companies and doctors make you sign a waiver that says you can't sue them if you have any kind of reaction or die from their covid shot??

WHO would still move forward on that kind of deal??

Dummies!!

well there are people who say this was covered up. which would remove the liability shield (or so a pretty smart person says ), unless this is the "good" fake data and the real data is even worse. either way..............

It's a long standing standard of release that needs to be reevaluated in the computing era.

OK, I will try to make the rough calculations quicky.

1. Let's focus on United States
"Most cases (34,762) were received from United States"

2. We can calculate deaths for the United States alone (maybe it is somewhere in the data but I can't find it), assuming that the death rate is the same as in other countries.

So 34762 / 42086 = 0.826 of the total AE's were from the US

Now 0.826 * 1223 = 1010, that's how many deaths we can expect in the US alone

3. [link to ourworldindata.org (secure)]
It says that by February 28, a total of 87.340.000 doses were administered, to 58.720.000 people, out of which 29.440.000 received 2 doses and the rest 1 dose

Assuming that people would have to eventually receive 2 doses anyway, so let's just divide 87.340.000 by half, that's 43.670.000.

1010 / 43.670.000 = 0,000023...,

That's roughly 1 in 50.000

So 1 in 50.000 fully vaccinated persons is expected to die

But we have to keep in mind that VAERS is universally recognized to be grossly underreported, even by as much as 10 or 100 times.

So it's safe to say that 1 in 50.000 is the MINIMUM, it's not lower than this, it's most definitely higher, maybe even much higher, it's only the MINIMUM POSSIBLE NUMBER.

perma pin please. no wonder they wanted to hide these docs for 77 years. heads are gonna roll

This^^^the only way we take back our lives and this world is to take down the media - and I mean take them down!

Queue the bg sp attack…

^^^ I used only the US data, because it was easier to find the numbers for 1 country so I thought this method was more reliable and quick to perform.

It shouldn't affect the general picture, any discrepancies in numbers should be cosmetic.

people dropping dead at football matches here every week now - and so, people with clout are actually starting to ask questions...

it's only a matter of time before so many drop dead that it's impossible to ignore.

My friend went and got a pfizer jab. She had an ongoing uti infection but went and got the double jab anyway. Now she is in Hospice. When you have an infection/low grade fever never EVER take a fake vaccine or eve a real one. Fuckers. All of the pharma companies and doctors who go along need to be hung.

Trying to wrap my brain around these numbers, but, if we assume that serious adverse events are "rare," and they're showing us that there were about 42,000 of them, then that would mean if they were as 'rare' as 1/1000, then there were about 42 MILLION people in the trial.

Which, obviously, can't be true. So, the serious adverse events have to be a LOT more common than 1/1000 'rare.'

How common ARE they?