TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER | |
uscrusader1
User ID: 79524545 United States 12/02/2021 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80274724 United States 12/02/2021 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you like to know which batches were the most toxic? Quoting: Clayton Bigsby Watch this video if you know your batch number COVID VACCINE BATCH NUMBERS CODE FOR TOXICITY **Different Dosages at Different Times** Some members have suggested that the toxic batches are due to pharma trying out different dosages upon the public. I thought this idea was worthy of investigation, so I did a brief study. The batches are listed in VAERS in the order in which they were released. I counted the number of adverse reactions for each batch, and present this as the y-axis on a chart that also orders the batches by the time sequence in which they were released (x-axis). I was looking for any pattern in the variation of toxicity over time. The resulting chart is shown below. **The immediate observation is that the toxicity of the batches varies massively over time. NOT ALL BATCHES ARE EQUAL - some are 1000 to 5000 times more toxic than others.** * A dosage was given with the 1500th batch that generated a sudden and abrupt increase to 2000 x the toxicity of previous batches. * Then there is a period of cessation until the 3000th batch. This is a gap of 1500 batches. During this period batches become harmless - producing 1 or 2 adverse reactions at most. * With the 3000th batch, toxicity is again boosted upto 2000 x, and these toxic batches are regularly interspersed with harmless batches. * Around about the 4500th batch they start using batches of higher toxicity - upto 4000 x, and reduce the number of batches of lower toxicity. * About the 11,000th batch the toxicity is reduced to 0-500 x * Then around the 12,000th batch, 7 batches are released all in the 1000x - 2000x range - followed soon after by an abrupt change back to the 0-500x range. * There then follows a complete cessation of toxic batches from the 13,000th batch until the 16,000th batch. This is a gap of 3000 batches. During this period, all the batches become harmless again - the majority producing just 1 or 2 adverse reactions per batch. During this time they were probably analysing the results. * Then from the 16,000th batch until the 21,000th batch they stop production of lower toxicity batches, and instead produce batches with a higher toxicity 1000-3000 x * Then with the 18,000th batch, they stop production of batches in the 1000-2000x range, and instead produce batches of a higher toxicity in the 2000x -3000x range. Then they step down the toxicity in 3 steps. * At the 19300th batch they drop the toxicity to 1500-2500x * Then at the 20,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 1000-2000x * Then at the 21,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 0-1500x * It looks as if they stopped using the toxic batches around 21882nd batch until present (28330th batch). They may of-course be planning to resume. They now have an idea of the effects of different dosages/toxicities. They are collating. **The large variations in the toxicity of the batches suggests that either the concentration or the ingredients were varied.** The **systematic steps** displayed in the chart, lend some credence to the idea that Pharma is adjusting the dosages with the entire population, and observing the effects. This is evidenced by 1. **abrupt, 1000-fold changes in toxicity** 1. **abrupt cessation of toxic batches and resuming of harmless ones ** 1. **step-wise changes in toxicity** 2021 is the year that they experimented. They now know what works and what does not work for their purposes. They have tested the lethal limits. Next year the application begins. This is my interpretation of the distribution of the data. [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Thoughts on boosters: The toxicity of the boosters depends on their motive for exploring high dosages previously. I expect they will re-release toxic batches - with elevated toxicity - most likely 3000 - 4000 x base toxicity. They could also use the batches to remove specific populations - the unemployed the aged the prison population ethnic minorities doctors and care workers teachers and educated people voters for opposing parties Here is a list of the batch numbers with the most toxicity. See if one of them are yours Swipe left for all pics [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Another video PATTERNS OF DEPLOYMENT OF TOXIC COVID VACCINE BATCHES Medical Experimentation On The American Public [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] The missing part of this equation is the number of doses in each of the lots and their distribution. If the lots with low adverse report counts have small counts for distribution that skews the analysis. The CDC has this data, but won't release it to the public. You have to register through their manual process and get approved. Who already has that data or is registered? Step up if you do. [link to vaccinecodeset.cdc.gov (secure)] |
Desert Oasis
User ID: 80782083 United States 12/02/2021 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81395966 12/02/2021 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79931320 United States 12/02/2021 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you like to know which batches were the most toxic? Quoting: Clayton Bigsby Watch this video if you know your batch number COVID VACCINE BATCH NUMBERS CODE FOR TOXICITY **Different Dosages at Different Times** Some members have suggested that the toxic batches are due to pharma trying out different dosages upon the public. I thought this idea was worthy of investigation, so I did a brief study. The batches are listed in VAERS in the order in which they were released. I counted the number of adverse reactions for each batch, and present this as the y-axis on a chart that also orders the batches by the time sequence in which they were released (x-axis). I was looking for any pattern in the variation of toxicity over time. The resulting chart is shown below. **The immediate observation is that the toxicity of the batches varies massively over time. NOT ALL BATCHES ARE EQUAL - some are 1000 to 5000 times more toxic than others.** * A dosage was given with the 1500th batch that generated a sudden and abrupt increase to 2000 x the toxicity of previous batches. * Then there is a period of cessation until the 3000th batch. This is a gap of 1500 batches. During this period batches become harmless - producing 1 or 2 adverse reactions at most. * With the 3000th batch, toxicity is again boosted upto 2000 x, and these toxic batches are regularly interspersed with harmless batches. * Around about the 4500th batch they start using batches of higher toxicity - upto 4000 x, and reduce the number of batches of lower toxicity. * About the 11,000th batch the toxicity is reduced to 0-500 x * Then around the 12,000th batch, 7 batches are released all in the 1000x - 2000x range - followed soon after by an abrupt change back to the 0-500x range. * There then follows a complete cessation of toxic batches from the 13,000th batch until the 16,000th batch. This is a gap of 3000 batches. During this period, all the batches become harmless again - the majority producing just 1 or 2 adverse reactions per batch. During this time they were probably analysing the results. * Then from the 16,000th batch until the 21,000th batch they stop production of lower toxicity batches, and instead produce batches with a higher toxicity 1000-3000 x * Then with the 18,000th batch, they stop production of batches in the 1000-2000x range, and instead produce batches of a higher toxicity in the 2000x -3000x range. Then they step down the toxicity in 3 steps. * At the 19300th batch they drop the toxicity to 1500-2500x * Then at the 20,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 1000-2000x * Then at the 21,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 0-1500x * It looks as if they stopped using the toxic batches around 21882nd batch until present (28330th batch). They may of-course be planning to resume. They now have an idea of the effects of different dosages/toxicities. They are collating. **The large variations in the toxicity of the batches suggests that either the concentration or the ingredients were varied.** The **systematic steps** displayed in the chart, lend some credence to the idea that Pharma is adjusting the dosages with the entire population, and observing the effects. This is evidenced by 1. **abrupt, 1000-fold changes in toxicity** 1. **abrupt cessation of toxic batches and resuming of harmless ones ** 1. **step-wise changes in toxicity** 2021 is the year that they experimented. They now know what works and what does not work for their purposes. They have tested the lethal limits. Next year the application begins. This is my interpretation of the distribution of the data. [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Thoughts on boosters: The toxicity of the boosters depends on their motive for exploring high dosages previously. I expect they will re-release toxic batches - with elevated toxicity - most likely 3000 - 4000 x base toxicity. They could also use the batches to remove specific populations - the unemployed the aged the prison population ethnic minorities doctors and care workers teachers and educated people voters for opposing parties Here is a list of the batch numbers with the most toxicity. See if one of them are yours Swipe left for all pics [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Another video PATTERNS OF DEPLOYMENT OF TOXIC COVID VACCINE BATCHES Medical Experimentation On The American Public [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Interesting info, but I question the use of the phrase, "...then all of the batches become harmless again." That won't truly be known for years. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81395966 12/02/2021 03:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5653910 United States 12/02/2021 03:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Overdue
User ID: 81347095 United States 12/02/2021 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO everytime you take the booster you roll the dice? Good luck with that! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80693096 United States 12/02/2021 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Southern Soldier
User ID: 63788239 United States 12/02/2021 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LookinUp1
User ID: 80739822 United States 12/02/2021 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's my link... Thread: I’m in healthcare caring for the vaxed and will tell you how many deaths, how they died, what each person is like after getting the shot... LookinUp1 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79248910 United States 12/02/2021 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So when someone* gets vaxxed do they get the same lot number for each dose? Or two different lot numbers? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79248910 Anyone know? 10 formulations, 3 injections 1000-1 odds of being the same. 2 people I know of got same batch number on both doses. They went to same pharmacy for both doses. I find that strange. The odds of that. I just assumed everyone got 2 doses of same batch. But it appears many people got 2 different lot numbers for each dose. |
boo radley
User ID: 77474316 United States 12/02/2021 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Was talking with friends that work in a pharmacy. Said they have fridges full of this shit, and it's so confusing. Which brand and type, which does what, how much is each dose, and which combination for children age groups and adults. It's a cluster**** just trying to keep it straight. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80192290 They said mistakes are made all the time, not intentional, but they happen. Don't be surprised if you get something you weren't intended to get. I asked a pharmacist if she got the EGT (EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY) and she said, -fully- since January. I asked if she heard about injuries. NOPE, NOT ONE. (....but you do read things....she said) |
boo radley
User ID: 77474316 United States 12/02/2021 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4803585 United States 12/02/2021 04:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eff Blo Jiden
User ID: 38756469 United States 12/02/2021 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eff Blo Jiden
User ID: 38756469 United States 12/02/2021 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CRISPR
User ID: 80457483 United States 12/02/2021 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73654379 United States 12/02/2021 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
InannaB
User ID: 72749227 United States 12/02/2021 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But what about the batches that made people sick for 1-2 days but then felt fine? This is how it's been for almost everyone I know. Everyone felt sick but the majority of them recovered quickly. If they got the placebo, why did they feel sick for 1-2 days? One of them had a blood pressure emergency after the booster but he went to get jabbed with three other people and they are all fine. Wouldn't they have gotten the same toxic batch? And how do can I find batch numbers if I haven't received the jab myself? |
Claim Jumper
User ID: 79895433 United States 12/02/2021 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cleolotus
User ID: 81030857 Philippines 12/02/2021 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One of my good friends told me the story of her Aunt. Her husband and her went to get the Vax. The husband had his and just as she was to have hers the Nurse said "wait a moment - I need to get a new batch" After she got home she felt unwell. The next day she was dead. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78148665 United States 12/02/2021 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
InannaB
User ID: 72749227 United States 12/02/2021 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LindaE
User ID: 76952466 United States 12/02/2021 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Husband got the Pfizer and one of his shots had adverse reactions of 2237. The other one didn't show up at all. I got the JandJ and my lot had adverse reactions of 1244. Husband got pneumonia (not unusual for him since he has scarred lungs) but it's taken four doses of antibiotics to get it mostly cleared. Two of the doses of the antibiotics were the same (Z-pak) and his pulmonologist shook his head and said that Z-pak isn't the best drug for my husband to knock out pneumonia (he wasn't the prescribing physician either time). I got a bad head cold (I get one like this every few years) and it lasted 6 weeks. My acupuncturist gave me what I call a cough-button (a little sticky with a tiny piece of metal in it) on my right collarbone. If you press on it when you get the urge to cough (lightly, not a deep cough from your chest) it can help stop the urge. Other than that, nothing. BTW, a great thread! |
Graboid_Hunter
User ID: 80638704 United States 12/02/2021 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2272340 United States 12/02/2021 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47882868 United States 12/02/2021 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47882868 United States 12/02/2021 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Art Bellicose User ID: 80289823 United States 12/02/2021 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I took the JnJ Vax in 9-10-21. I had some post Vax troubling symptoms . here are my test results. CT scan of heart No Myocarditis No Pericardidit No Pulmonary embolisms. Nothing. I know what you're going to say YoU DiD nOt GeT tHe ToXic LoT !!!! Go ahead and me again. |