Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 979 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 138,844
Pageviews Today: 293,970Threads Today: 114Posts Today: 2,803
05:00 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 81404567
United Kingdom
12/02/2021 11:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
:COMMIEKILLSHOTS:
 Quoting: Butch DeFeo


Lol.

Awesome meme.

Made me laugh and it's so true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80354296
United States
12/02/2021 11:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
I wish I understood stats, so I could appreciate the work you put into this more. For now 5 stars and a pine for putting out something that even a math dunce can follow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6872120


The stats come from vaers.
Typically when reporting adverse reactions to the vaccine, they put in a batch number of the vaccine that person received.
All that had to be done was to compile all the adverse reactions and sort them based on batch numbers.

And 1 batch of a vaccine could potentially get into the arms of thousands, even tens of thousands of people depending on how big their batches are.
 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


a serious inquiry.

It's been said that when a person goes to get a vax, they enter your name/SS and the computer tells them which specific lot to administer.

The theory is that whoever is running the database and the 'selection' intentionally prescribes either a saline shot or one that causes illness/clots/death. The nurse/doctor has no idea that some are merely saline shots. Of course, it's been mainstream news that many clinics have given saline instead of the vax. It would seem that the saline shots are not given by accident.

The question:

Have you found any hard proof on this subject? Does it happen or doesn't it happen?
McKracken

User ID: 77750652
United States
12/02/2021 11:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
According to the video about 28000 batches were deployed during the year 2021. Individual toxic batches caused 1000 - 5000 critical adverse reactions each.

How many vaccine doses are made from each batch on average?
McKracken

User ID: 77750652
United States
12/03/2021 12:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
[link to jessicar.substack.com (secure)] discusses an error the video author made by assuming the batch number indicates a time-based order. When ordering by the injection time, it looks non-suspicious. But that display error doesn't reduce the problem that critical batches indeed exist and can be identified by their batch number.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34356481
United States
12/03/2021 08:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
My elderly father and stepmother both died 5-6 months after vaccination. Their batch number was

EJ6796 Pfizer "Comirnaty," injected in Switzerland.

They received the same batch number for both sets of injections-- probably because they lived in a small town in a less populated canton.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79756661
United States
12/03/2021 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Seems pretty obvious that data collection from social media and the democratic party make up the distribution of the bad batches. It has already been noted that bad batches went to red states.
Hard Assets
User ID: 78016925
Canada
12/03/2021 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Would you like to know which batches were the most toxic?
Watch this video if you know your batch number

COVID VACCINE BATCH NUMBERS CODE FOR TOXICITY


**Different Dosages at Different Times**

Some members have suggested that the toxic batches are due to pharma trying out different dosages upon the public. I thought this idea was worthy of investigation, so I did a brief study.

The batches are listed in VAERS in the order in which they were released. I counted the number of adverse reactions for each batch, and present this as the y-axis on a chart that also orders the batches by the time sequence in which they were released (x-axis).

I was looking for any pattern in the variation of toxicity over time.

The resulting chart is shown below.

**The immediate observation is that the toxicity of the batches varies massively over time. NOT ALL BATCHES ARE EQUAL - some are  1000 to 5000 times more toxic than others.**

* A dosage was given with the 1500th batch that generated a sudden and abrupt increase to 2000 x the toxicity of previous batches.
* Then there is a period of cessation until the 3000th batch. This is a gap of 1500 batches. During this period batches become harmless - producing 1 or 2 adverse reactions at most.
* With the 3000th batch, toxicity is again boosted upto 2000 x, and these toxic batches are regularly interspersed with harmless batches.
* Around about the 4500th batch they start using batches of higher toxicity - upto 4000 x, and reduce the number of batches of lower toxicity.
* About the 11,000th batch the toxicity is reduced to 0-500 x
* Then around the 12,000th batch, 7 batches are released all in the 1000x - 2000x range - followed soon after by an abrupt change back to the 0-500x range.
* There then follows a complete cessation of toxic batches from the 13,000th batch until the 16,000th batch. This is a gap of 3000 batches. During this period, all the batches become harmless again - the majority producing just 1 or 2 adverse reactions per batch.

        During this time they were probably analysing the results.
* Then from the 16,000th batch until the 21,000th batch they stop production of lower toxicity batches, and instead produce batches with a higher toxicity 1000-3000 x
* Then with the 18,000th batch, they stop production of batches in the 1000-2000x range, and instead produce batches of a higher toxicity  in the 2000x -3000x range.

        Then they step down the toxicity in 3 steps.
* At the 19300th batch they drop the toxicity to 1500-2500x
* Then at the 20,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 1000-2000x
* Then at the 21,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 0-1500x
* It looks as if they stopped using the toxic batches around 21882nd batch until present (28330th batch).

They may of-course be planning to resume. They now have an idea of the effects of different dosages/toxicities.

They are collating.

**The large variations in the toxicity of the batches suggests that either the concentration or the ingredients were varied.**

The **systematic steps** displayed in the chart, lend some credence to the idea that Pharma is adjusting the dosages with the entire population, and observing the effects. This is evidenced by
1. **abrupt, 1000-fold changes in toxicity**
1. **abrupt cessation of toxic batches and resuming of harmless ones **
1. **step-wise changes in toxicity**

2021 is the year that they experimented.

They now know what works and what does not work for their purposes. They have tested the lethal limits.

Next year the application begins.

This is my interpretation of the distribution of the data.
[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

Thoughts on boosters:
The toxicity of the boosters depends on their motive for exploring high dosages previously.

I expect they will re-release toxic batches - with elevated toxicity - most likely 3000 - 4000 x base toxicity.

They could also use the batches to remove specific populations -

the unemployed
the aged
the prison population

ethnic minorities
doctors and care workers
teachers and educated people
voters for opposing parties

Here is a list of the batch numbers with the most toxicity. See if one of them are yours
Swipe left for all pics
[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

Another video
PATTERNS OF DEPLOYMENT OF TOXIC COVID VACCINE BATCHES


Medical Experimentation On The American Public
[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby



It MUST be known who/where these toxic batches were made?

Did Phizer/Moderna make these batches or contracted production lines that were contaminated, either accidentally or purposely?
Clayton Bigsby  (OP)

User ID: 81416362
United States
12/03/2021 06:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Seems pretty obvious that data collection from social media and the democratic party make up the distribution of the bad batches. It has already been noted that bad batches went to red states.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79756661


Thread: Political Differences in the Distribution of Adverse Reactions Caused By The Vax
Tex the Neanderthal

User ID: 79310585
United States
12/03/2021 07:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
I wish I understood stats, so I could appreciate the work you put into this more. For now 5 stars and a pine for putting out something that even a math dunce can follow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6872120


The stats come from vaers.
Typically when reporting adverse reactions to the vaccine, they put in a batch number of the vaccine that person received.
All that had to be done was to compile all the adverse reactions and sort them based on batch numbers.

And 1 batch of a vaccine could potentially get into the arms of thousands, even tens of thousands of people depending on how big their batches are.
 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


Do we know if 1 batch can be distributed to different regions? If 100's or 10,000 people got one of the highly toxic batch it would be too recognizable if they went to the same region. Seems like they would have to divide up and go to different states or cities.
Tex the Neanderthal

User ID: 79310585
United States
12/03/2021 07:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Appreciate the work that went into this and the write up on the data. Statistics like these baffle me but I'm trying to follow the complexities and understand.

1. Are the 3 companies on a schedule as to when each one releases their toxic batches? Each knows their window, then they step aside and the next one goes? Or they release whatever batch they plan during their window- toxic or untoxic?

2. I wonder why J&J had such a low number of events. Are all/most of the initial myocarditis events for J&J from just those 2 batches?

3. For the toxic batches, wonder if they are just just more concentrated or do those batches have different ingredients. Could the Graphene be in only some batches?

4. If someone received vaccines from a toxic batch and did not experience adverse events beyond the usual, are they a ticking time bomb and their adverse events will come later - 6 mos to a year?
Your Huckleberry

User ID: 81409790
United States
12/03/2021 07:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Would you like to know which batches were the most toxic?
Watch this video if you know your batch number

COVID VACCINE BATCH NUMBERS CODE FOR TOXICITY


**Different Dosages at Different Times**

Some members have suggested that the toxic batches are due to pharma trying out different dosages upon the public. I thought this idea was worthy of investigation, so I did a brief study.

The batches are listed in VAERS in the order in which they were released. I counted the number of adverse reactions for each batch, and present this as the y-axis on a chart that also orders the batches by the time sequence in which they were released (x-axis).

I was looking for any pattern in the variation of toxicity over time.

The resulting chart is shown below.

**The immediate observation is that the toxicity of the batches varies massively over time. NOT ALL BATCHES ARE EQUAL - some are  1000 to 5000 times more toxic than others.**

* A dosage was given with the 1500th batch that generated a sudden and abrupt increase to 2000 x the toxicity of previous batches.
* Then there is a period of cessation until the 3000th batch. This is a gap of 1500 batches. During this period batches become harmless - producing 1 or 2 adverse reactions at most.
* With the 3000th batch, toxicity is again boosted upto 2000 x, and these toxic batches are regularly interspersed with harmless batches.
* Around about the 4500th batch they start using batches of higher toxicity - upto 4000 x, and reduce the number of batches of lower toxicity.
* About the 11,000th batch the toxicity is reduced to 0-500 x
* Then around the 12,000th batch, 7 batches are released all in the 1000x - 2000x range - followed soon after by an abrupt change back to the 0-500x range.
* There then follows a complete cessation of toxic batches from the 13,000th batch until the 16,000th batch. This is a gap of 3000 batches. During this period, all the batches become harmless again - the majority producing just 1 or 2 adverse reactions per batch.

        During this time they were probably analysing the results.
* Then from the 16,000th batch until the 21,000th batch they stop production of lower toxicity batches, and instead produce batches with a higher toxicity 1000-3000 x
* Then with the 18,000th batch, they stop production of batches in the 1000-2000x range, and instead produce batches of a higher toxicity  in the 2000x -3000x range.

        Then they step down the toxicity in 3 steps.
* At the 19300th batch they drop the toxicity to 1500-2500x
* Then at the 20,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 1000-2000x
* Then at the 21,000th batch they drop the toxicity to 0-1500x
* It looks as if they stopped using the toxic batches around 21882nd batch until present (28330th batch).

They may of-course be planning to resume. They now have an idea of the effects of different dosages/toxicities.

They are collating.

**The large variations in the toxicity of the batches suggests that either the concentration or the ingredients were varied.**

The **systematic steps** displayed in the chart, lend some credence to the idea that Pharma is adjusting the dosages with the entire population, and observing the effects. This is evidenced by
1. **abrupt, 1000-fold changes in toxicity**
1. **abrupt cessation of toxic batches and resuming of harmless ones **
1. **step-wise changes in toxicity**

2021 is the year that they experimented.

They now know what works and what does not work for their purposes. They have tested the lethal limits.

Next year the application begins.

This is my interpretation of the distribution of the data.
https://imgur.com/a/zT2prci


Thoughts on boosters:
The toxicity of the boosters depends on their motive for exploring high dosages previously.

I expect they will re-release toxic batches - with elevated toxicity - most likely 3000 - 4000 x base toxicity.

They could also use the batches to remove specific populations -

the unemployed
the aged
the prison population

ethnic minorities
doctors and care workers
teachers and educated people
voters for opposing parties

Here is a list of the batch numbers with the most toxicity. See if one of them are yours
Swipe left for all pics
https://imgur.com/a/PT2CUDN


Another video
PATTERNS OF DEPLOYMENT OF TOXIC COVID VACCINE BATCHES


Medical Experimentation On The American Public
https://imgur.com/a/pyuISu9

 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


The missing part of this equation is the number of doses in each of the lots and their distribution. If the lots with low adverse report counts have small counts for distribution that skews the analysis. The CDC has this data, but won't release it to the public. You have to register through their manual process and get approved. Who already has that data or is registered? Step up if you do.

[link to vaccinecodeset.cdc.gov (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80274724


Considering the stark disparity in the adverse event occurances between lots, I can't imagine the difference in doses per lot would make a statistically significant difference in the conclusion being drawn.
Your Huckleberry
Tex the Neanderthal

User ID: 79310585
United States
12/03/2021 11:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
I wish I understood stats, so I could appreciate the work you put into this more. For now 5 stars and a pine for putting out something that even a math dunce can follow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6872120


The stats come from vaers.
Typically when reporting adverse reactions to the vaccine, they put in a batch number of the vaccine that person received.
All that had to be done was to compile all the adverse reactions and sort them based on batch numbers.

And 1 batch of a vaccine could potentially get into the arms of thousands, even tens of thousands of people depending on how big their batches are.
 Quoting: Clayton Bigsby


Do we know if 1 batch can be distributed to different regions? If 100's or 10,000 people got one of the highly toxic batch it would be too recognizable if they went to the same region. Seems like they would have to divide up and go to different states or cities.
 Quoting: Tex the Neanderthal


Found this in the link on the Moderna California local adverse event post

Moderna confirmed that a total of 1,272,200 doses were produced in batch number 041L20A, with nearly a million doses (964,900) already distributed to approximately 1,700 vaccination sites in 37 states. According to CDPH, that includes more than 330,000 doses from this lot distributed to 287 providers across the state of California. A total of 307,300 doses remain in storage and not yet distributed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78801891
Czech Republic
12/05/2021 04:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
My batches ended in 21A. What can I do?
Clayton Bigsby  (OP)

User ID: 78673015
United States
12/06/2021 01:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Thread: Moderna used alphabet to label different toxicities of vaccine
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78619133
United States
12/08/2021 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Was talking with friends that work in a pharmacy. Said they have fridges full of this shit, and it's so confusing. Which brand and type, which does what, how much is each dose, and which combination for children age groups and adults. It's a cluster**** just trying to keep it straight.

They said mistakes are made all the time, not intentional, but they happen. Don't be surprised if you get something you weren't intended to get.

lolatu
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80192290


billgatestyrone1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78619133
United States
12/08/2021 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
My batches ended in 21A. What can I do?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78801891


take mms, lots of threads on here...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78619133
United States
12/08/2021 02:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
Related Threads
1 The vaxx batch number thing 2d 16h
2 Why do they need to record vaccine "batch numbers" on peoples vaccine cards? 07/28/21
3 California Halts COVID Vaccinations From Moderna Batch Linked To "Unusually High Number" Of Adverse Reactions 01/18/21
4 The batch numbers of the vaccine/VAERS reports. absolutely deliberate and precise numbers shown at end. 12/05/21
5 2 Dead In Japan After Receiving Moderna Jabs From Contaminated Batches 08/28/21
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80614245
United States
12/08/2021 03:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
I was at the Walmart Pharmacy a couple of days ago. Three people were there getting shots (idk specifically for what, but high probability at least one was getting the vaxx).

I saw the person in the pharmacy holding a CDC card and looking in the freezer to get the batch number. Obviously, i was too far away to know what any of this said, i just recognized the card.

However, that is how they get the batch number... From what is in the freezer, not the computer (judging by her actions). That particular Walmart gives out Moderna and Pfizer last time I asked them.

For a while, if you went to pick up rx, they told you about the vaxx being available. So, i would ask what they had.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80614245
United States
12/08/2021 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: TO EVERYONE WHO RECEIVED A VAX IN THE US CHECK YOUR BATCH NUMBER
My batches ended in 21A. What can I do?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78801891


In the video, you will see there are batches that end in 21A that don't show a very high number of adverse reactions. It's just the batches with high numbers of adverse reactions end in 20A or 21A.

You need your entire batch number in order to check which one you're in.





GLP