Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation

Appologies if this has already been posted, but would appreciate your thoughts on this one. I notice that it is just an article though.
[link to www.scimex.org (secure)]

OP, Will answer ASAP.

One of the things that these sort of threads do is make me quite expert at identifying buses, trains, boats and planes. :)


I think the root cause of people rejecting the existence of viruses is a lack of basic understanding, so it is an easy way to preserve one's ego to simply dismiss their existence.

So Let's go over the basics and a little vocabulary.
I am not the expert in this area or even an informed layperson, but in the absence of anyone giving some background, I will take a wack at it. Because I am nothing if not a bull in a china shop. :)

Cells contain these twisted strands of DNA which are complex interminably long sequences of genes. To grow and live, some way of replicating that DNA is needed. Enter the Ribosome. A little factory that I think of as the part of a zipper that you grab onto, that merges or diverges the 2 sides of the zipper.

Stuff enters one end of the Ribosome, and the ribosome translates the genetic information pattern to make a new strand that mirrors itself, the RNA. This then becomes like a pattern for making new DNA in another Ribosome.

So you have these little molecular keys floating around and you have these little zipper and unzipper factories (ribosomes) floating around.
The virus is a set of keys from the outside that has flaws in the gene sequences, such that when they enter a Ribosome, the Ribocome creates a copy of the "Bogus RNA" as a mirror image Bogus DNA that then makes bogus RNA strands etc. until something breaks down. At some point, the cell physically explodes, destroying that bit of lung tissue or whatever, and the "virus" bogus mRNA strands are released to create new havoc in other cells, somewhat like a nuclear fission reaction.

The "virus questioners" seems to be asking for a jar of the virus similar to a jar of peanuts. Physically isolating the viral RNA. Well, the stuff is incredibly fragile, especially if not sitting in a cell's cytoplasm. Taken out of the body and put into a jar will result in the stuff falling apart very quickly, unless you cool it enough to stop molecular vibration sufficiently for the fragile thing to hold together. And having such a jar of virus would be kind of pointless. You still need an electron microscope to "look" at it. And the mere act of "looking at it", will likely destroy it.

In the real world, the virus overcomes its fragility so it can survive long enough to infect the next innocent mammal, by flying through the air or sitting on a surface along with some mucus and cytoplasm. Now it might survive for hours at room temperature. And by survive, I don't mean it is living, but simply "viable" or capable of starting a new infection in the new mammal.

So it would be wildly difficult to fill up a peanut jar full of virus particles only and it would offer no tangible benefit, hence, nobody is going to show you a jar full of virus. :)


Feel free to correct or point out errors. Like I said, I am only vaguely familiar with this stuff, but think everyone should at least have a basic understanding of the technology.
The article below gives a better description and I copied the intro paragraph to the article.


Replication, Transcription and Translation.

[link to www.khanacademy.org (secure)]

[link to bscb.org (secure)]

"A ribosome functions as a micro-machine for making proteins. Ribosomes are composed of special proteins and nucleic acids. The TRANSLATION of information and the Linking of AMINO ACIDS are at the heart of the protein production process.A ribosome, formed from two subunits locking together, functions to: (1) Translate encoded information from the cell nucleus provided by messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), (2) Link together amino acids selected and collected from the cytoplasm by transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA). (The order in which the amino acids are linked together is determined by the mRNA) and, (3) Export the polypeptide produced to the cytoplasm where it will form a functional protein.

Ribosomes are found ‘free’ in the cytoplasm or bound to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to form rough ER. In a mammalian cell there can be as many as 10 million ribosomes. Several ribosomes can be attached to the same mRNA strand, this structure is called a polysome. Ribosomes have only a temporary existence. When they have synthesised a polypeptide the two sub-units separate and are either re-used or broken up" - Less than 50%

Crazy tin foil hat theory:



So it seems all the studies say "we isolated Covid 19 because our genome sequencing matches the consensus genome sequence"


... Which is the genome sequencing released from CHINA




which they have because...




They MADE IT!?!?!





Could it be?

They were doing gain of function research.
Revealing the method of INITIAL genome sequencing then could spotlight that it is a bioweapon and PAID FOR AND DESIGNED by the very people claiming to be our medical guidance and saviors?






Gotta go find my tin foil hat.
Chew on that for a minute...

OK, thank you and I think you cover the entire situation pretty well and I agree with most of your points.

Trying to break it down in some sort of order, here are my comments, which mostly align with what you said, perhaps just saying a bit differently.

The virus was developed and sequenced over years of research in level 4 biolabs in the US and the new one in Wuhan China.

I suppose the US involved the China lab to save money in the work and also to take advantage of an environment that might bypass some of the safeguards that the US industry imposes on bioweapon development. Over the years of development work, I believe they had the entire gene sequence. (nobody started from scratch and generated the full genome in the approx. 2 weeks between the public announcement of the virus being in the wild and their announcement that they had the full gene map and were publishing it to share with the world.) (my opinion)

Every vaccine maker then tried to "one up" each other declaring they could make a vaccine with that info in 48 hours or some such egotistical posturing announcements meant to drive up their share prices.

Anyway, the lab in China benefitted the US biowarfare team, because they could safely conduct their evil virus enhancements free from watchdog oversight. And it benefitted China, because they (as eloquently expressed in their retiring general's farewell speech, they needed a way to wipe out the population of the US, thus "cleaning it up", so they could move here to live. He said their homeland was far too polluted, crowded and resource poor to sustain their population and they had to expand. And the US would stop that expansion unless we were mostly dead).

Now, whether or not this disease release was their intended virus for that purpose or just perhaps some intermediate step that accidentally got loose due to their faulty procedures or faulty equipment is anyone's guess.

The fact remains that a virus was released. It is pretty nasty in that it goes straight for the lungs, wrecks the lung tissue and has the ability to shut off the immune response until it has replicated throughout the body and has caused varying degrees of lung damage ranging from minor to a dead patient.

Being based on a corona virus, this is a new level of lethality given to the "common cold" which was never viewed as life threatening in the past. People got colds, they blew their noses for a week and they recovered. So this enhanced lethality version was a step change in what the little round viruses could do.

Thank god or whatever you believe in, that doctors discovered Ivermectin which blocked at a fundamental level, the ability of the virus to keep your immune system turned off. and it blocks the method by which the virus can inject its payload of goodies into your cell nucleus. (by binding with Imp alpha and beta, making them unavailable to the virus).

We know that by rejecting this solution outright, demonizing it and its proponents, and censoring any sort of articles or reports of its effectiveness, that the goal of Fauci, the NIH, Gates and whoever else is setting policy, that they care nothing about the health of the citizens of the US and the World. Their single minded pushing of the vaccines and nothing but the vaccines shows that they are simply working on behalf of the pharmaceutical companies.

And as a second objective, this has given government a tool to impose new rules and enforcement policies by virtue of a
program of spreading weaponized fear among the population.

And it seems if you believe the researchers in Europe, that beyond developing some sort of targetted gene based vaccine, they also added graphene hyroxide molecular ribbons, which develop a slight negative charge that keeps them in suspension and if injected into the bloodstream, will cut the delicate smooth epithelial cell lining of the blood vessels as well as to shred red blood cells. Such that any vaccines injected into the bloodstream result in rapid death from massive clotting as the body lays down cholesterol to attempt repair of the blood vessels as they are continually sliced up by the circulating super sharp graphene ribbons.

Untreated, the COvid19 was found to present very little risk of death for those under 60 yrs old and essentially zero risk of death for those under say 35 to 40.

To insist upon vaccinating children is wholly unwarranted and demonstrates an intent to kill, plain and simple.

The other problem with a vaccine based approach to containing and stopping the virus, is the well known speed with which corona virii mutate. there are probably hundreds of mutations already. They only name the ones that are considered dangerous enough to be "of interest".

Throughout this pandemic, they have ignored science completely. Told people to wear masks. If a mask approach was to have any value, they would have to meet certain standards. N95, P100 cartridge respirators fitted into a face conforming rubbery type respirator appliance by a real company like 3M or one of its peers. Not some homemade thing made from left over pajamas. And not disposable respirators that bypass approx 5% of the air along the inadequate cheek and nose seal.

The science says the only way to wipe out the virus is by giving the population a prophylactic dose regime of Ivermectin long enough for people's own natural immune systems to wipe out the virus.

Is it a real virus? Yes, but not the influenza type. A step change in the lethality of the common cold virus. Still not terribly lethal, but much worse than the cold virus has been historically.

Ivermectin alone will wipe this out, without masks, without social distancing, without lock-downs, and most certainly without vaccines. Vaccines, even if perfect, cannot win this battle. The virus mutates way too fast, and these organizations that bragged that they could crank out a full gene map in a week and a vaccine 48 hours later have developed NO NEW VACCINE FOR ANY OF THE NEW VARIANTS that have emerged in the last 2 years. Why??

The proof that Ivermectin will wipe it out is in Africa.
Countries there that are giving the population Ivermectin already in low doses to prevent the onch worm infections, has already shown the efficacy of an Ivermectin program, quite by accident. If the program was followed with proper intent to combat covid, covid would simply disappear.

[link to www.scielo.org.co]

[link to www.scielo.org.co]

Hope that helps.

Can you expand on this? Or maybe point me in the right direction to find out more on this?




And it seems if you believe the researchers in Europe, that beyond developing some sort of targetted gene based vaccine, they also added graphene hyroxide molecular ribbons, which develop a slight negative charge that keeps them in suspension and if injected into the bloodstream, will cut the delicate smooth epithelial cell lining of the blood vessels as well as to shred red blood cells. Such that any vaccines injected into the bloodstream result in rapid death from massive clotting as the body lays down cholesterol to attempt repair of the blood vessels as they are continually sliced up by the circulating super sharp graphene ribbons.



I saw several Bitchute videos where scientists, I wanna say from Portugal??, eere discussing electron microscope studies and images of vaxxed blood, and talking about graphene oxide. But it was not in English and I guess I didn't have the patience to sit through the whole thing.


Where did you here about the "super sharp graphene ribbons slicing thru epithelial tissue" ?


That certainly makes sense and would help explain the blood clots.

One of the things that these sort of threads do is make me quite expert at identifying buses, trains, boats and planes. :)


I think the root cause of people rejecting the existence of viruses is a lack of basic understanding, so it is an easy way to preserve one's ego to simply dismiss their existence.

So Let's go over the basics and a little vocabulary.
I am not the expert in this area or even an informed layperson, but in the absence of anyone giving some background, I will take a wack at it. Because I am nothing if not a bull in a china shop. :)

Cells contain these twisted strands of DNA which are complex interminably long sequences of genes. To grow and live, some way of replicating that DNA is needed. Enter the Ribosome. A little factory that I think of as the part of a zipper that you grab onto, that merges or diverges the 2 sides of the zipper.

Stuff enters one end of the Ribosome, and the ribosome translates the genetic information pattern to make a new strand that mirrors itself, the RNA. This then becomes like a pattern for making new DNA in another Ribosome.

So you have these little molecular keys floating around and you have these little zipper and unzipper factories (ribosomes) floating around.
The virus is a set of keys from the outside that has flaws in the gene sequences, such that when they enter a Ribosome, the Ribocome creates a copy of the "Bogus RNA" as a mirror image Bogus DNA that then makes bogus RNA strands etc. until something breaks down. At some point, the cell physically explodes, destroying that bit of lung tissue or whatever, and the "virus" bogus mRNA strands are released to create new havoc in other cells, somewhat like a nuclear fission reaction.

The "virus questioners" seems to be asking for a jar of the virus similar to a jar of peanuts. Physically isolating the viral RNA. Well, the stuff is incredibly fragile, especially if not sitting in a cell's cytoplasm. Taken out of the body and put into a jar will result in the stuff falling apart very quickly, unless you cool it enough to stop molecular vibration sufficiently for the fragile thing to hold together. And having such a jar of virus would be kind of pointless. You still need an electron microscope to "look" at it. And the mere act of "looking at it", will likely destroy it.

In the real world, the virus overcomes its fragility so it can survive long enough to infect the next innocent mammal, by flying through the air or sitting on a surface along with some mucus and cytoplasm. Now it might survive for hours at room temperature. And by survive, I don't mean it is living, but simply "viable" or capable of starting a new infection in the new mammal.

So it would be wildly difficult to fill up a peanut jar full of virus particles only and it would offer no tangible benefit, hence, nobody is going to show you a jar full of virus. :)


Feel free to correct or point out errors. Like I said, I am only vaguely familiar with this stuff, but think everyone should at least have a basic understanding of the technology.
The article below gives a better description and I copied the intro paragraph to the article.


Replication, Transcription and Translation.

[link to www.khanacademy.org (secure)]

[link to bscb.org (secure)]

"A ribosome functions as a micro-machine for making proteins. Ribosomes are composed of special proteins and nucleic acids. The TRANSLATION of information and the Linking of AMINO ACIDS are at the heart of the protein production process.A ribosome, formed from two subunits locking together, functions to: (1) Translate encoded information from the cell nucleus provided by messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), (2) Link together amino acids selected and collected from the cytoplasm by transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA). (The order in which the amino acids are linked together is determined by the mRNA) and, (3) Export the polypeptide produced to the cytoplasm where it will form a functional protein.

Ribosomes are found ‘free’ in the cytoplasm or bound to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to form rough ER. In a mammalian cell there can be as many as 10 million ribosomes. Several ribosomes can be attached to the same mRNA strand, this structure is called a polysome. Ribosomes have only a temporary existence. When they have synthesised a polypeptide the two sub-units separate and are either re-used or broken up" - Less than 50%

Do you think a suit of old passports would protect you from the virus.

Another great post RHCP. You are killing it with the knowledge you bring to this topic.

I have a few questions, maybe you can answer or help point me in the right direction. I hope you don't mind my attempt to pick your brain. No rush,no pressure but if you can help me understand things better or guide me to where I can learn more I would appreciate it.



1a- Why do you think no one has published a study using the method you mention in the first paragraph above?
(Or has anyone done this?)


viral particles can be isolated and purified, and, for example, presented a as lyophilized dust




2- you state the following


it was already technically feasible to create new viruses with the biotechnological tools of that time, which have only improved since


Would creating new viruses or modifying viruses leave any sort of "digital fingerprint" that would upon proper examination demonstrate that the virus being studied has been "created" or altered?

It's a tricky question, of course that if the new virus is created for reseach purposes, it would probably bear a lot of tell tales that are associated with the use of biotechnological tools. In these case the "digital fingerprint" would be more of a "genetic marker fingerprint". It has already been said that the alleged SARS CoV 2 "natural origin story" has a lot of mathematical inconsistencies when the gene sequence is studied in depth. I never bought the natural origin so that point is moot, anyway. Also bear in mind that the so called S1 and S2 segments of coronaviruses have been patented for several uses even before year 2000, so nothing of this is really new, technologically wise, all that has happened since is that the tools have improved in capacity in these years.

3- I believe you mentioned prions or something acting like prions in a previous post, can you elaborate on this?


I read somewhere that DNA is only ever found in the nucleus of human cells, and that mRNA is also usually only found in certain areas inside the cell. (Ribosomes? Cytoplast?) And that source said that when RNA material is in the body outside of the cell it can function like prions. Is this correct?

What are prions?
(This is on my library research list)

I believe I have read they can cause symptoms similar to dementia.
I suspect this may have been involved in my friends double jabbed (and possibly boostered) mom dying at age 70 after being diagnosed with rapid onset dementia, then declining rapidly and dying.

I learnt the term prion in the context of the causant agent of the spongiform encephalitys, the most popular of which is the "mad cow disease" but of which exists several types. Based in the much less famous one named "Kuru" that was more frequently observed in some cannibalistic tribes of New Guinea, I have long held the hypothesis that the Spongiform Encephalitys is the way nature discourages cannibalism.

Prions are a protein that is a variant of a natural form that presents a different conformation that can cause disease, and that can, by a mechanism still under study, an spontaneous change on the configuration of the "healthy" form, that starts to be formed in the pathogenic form and never reverts to the "healthy" or "original" form. Prions involved in spongiform encephalitys are normally short protein sequences that "fold" the wrong way, or in other words, have an altered 3D configuration, even if the amino acid sequence is the same. These proteins accumulate in the brain and cause damage that destroys the neurones and is often rather quickly lethal since the onset of the associated and obvious dementia symptoms.

The Spike Protein is not a prion per se. But as a synthetic protein,in the sense that it may have been created through genetic engineering instead of naturally created by evolution of wild Coronaviruses spikes, and is pathogenic per se, it could be said, in that regard, a prion like protein. It has also been already studied and found to contain, embedded in the total, short aminoacid sequences that match the sequence of known disease causing prions, and, because of this, it would not be possible to absolutey discard that after injection with an mRNA "vaccine" and during the existence of the resulting spike proteins in the body, and their degradation, part of those prion sequences could be released and cause the prion disease, as prions are considered highly contagious


4- Dr Thomas Cowan claims he has replicated the most common methods used to verify/prove viruses, following the method exactly but never introducing any viral material, and achieved the same results as the $cience which is used to promote virology, and subsequently vaccines etc.

Can you comment on this?


Edit: here it is



13:35 he discussed how virologists do studies
16min he discusses his experiment


I'll edit and post the video where he says it so you can hear him discuss the methods. (from memory he did the monkey kidney cell culture, bovine cells, starved the cells, then introduced something maybe antibiotic which broke down the cell, leaving fractured cell material which he is saying is wrongly being called virus. Excuse my mistakes, I'll get the video so you can hear his words and method exactly)

This is a very good question and a big part of the current problem we have when official or mainstream science imposes its criteria. One has to be able to differentiate a method to reproduce a virus from a method to prove a virus is present in a problem sample.

What Dr. Cowan describes as being used as a way to prove the virus is present is an agreed upon in vitro screening method. It is agreed upon that if you do a certain protocol to test a sample and the cells die, then is because the virus was present in the sample. One should always do the "counter sample" with a virus free control, and probably it was done at some point.

Here I want to take a pause to analyze two separate problems:

1- How we know that a virus is present? We need to obtain samples from the persons allegedly being made sick by the possible virus. Then we have to seed these samples in cell cultures of different kinds to see if the cells are affected. Mind you, cell cultures are a whole problem on their own, keeping them alive and free of microorganisms requires a lot of systems and is prone to failure if strict protocols aren't followed, so a cell dying can be caused by many other things than a virus. Thus the cell cultures that die need to be analyzed under electron microscopy to identify viral particles, and you should analyze a lot of samples with a consistent morphology of viral particles to be sure that it is what is causing the death of the cells. Needless to say, this is time and resource consuming.

2- How we know the virus found is the causant of the disease? So, once you find the viral particles, you should employ techniques to separate the viral particles from the cell cultures, and then infect a healthy human with them and see if they develop the disease. Of course we can't do that, so this is replaced by other test systems as humanized animals (animals that have been genetically modified to have tissues that are very similar to huma tissues from the point of view of the cell membrane receptors) and infect them with the isolated particles and see if they get diseased. I don't know if this was ever done for SARS CoV 2, and I can't assume it was. Can't prove it wasn't also.

After this parethesis, I want to get back to what I know has happened: Under the rush of a "highly contagious disease" that "became a threat for all the world", many corners may have been cut. Thus, the Steps 1 and 2 were, allegedly, done by the Chinese, they then quickly sequenciated the mRNA, and uploaded it to the gene bank. No one else has done it, several other labs requested the viral samples, but the Chinese government ordered all of them destroyed, and many papers were also removed from their initial publications, and everything anyone else has done since refers back to what the Chinese supposedly did, so we have to believe them.

The screening method that Dr. Cowan refers to, skips the important part of finding the viruses under electron microscopy (time and resource consuming) and is assumed that the cells die by the presence of the virus. It is only a faulty research tool, based in a flawed premise. It should not be used, but as the PCR tests, once the mainstream agrees on something, and this something becomes the "gold standard" and also allows anyone to publish by using these "gold standards", people quickly forget about checking if the "gold standard" was really gold, or as in this case, pure crap.



5- can you recommend any books or subjects that I could research to gain a better understanding of viruses, how they work, etc?

In all honesty any last edition high school biology book has all what any layman needs to know about viruses in first place to be able to then go up in bigger detail. Then there's a lot of virology books that can be found for free online, in places that can't be linked here for obvious reasons.

My current gameplan is to search terms "virus" "organic chemistry" and maybe "prions" or books by a few doctors who I have found who are challenging the $¢ien¢e.





Finally, I assume you are familiar with the nanolipid / lipid nanoparticles which some people are saying is graphene oxide. What do you think about this?

A poster above suggested that this could be causing the strokes and blood clotting. Does that seem plausible to you?

The Nanolipids haven't been disclosed in detail. But already whistleblower Karen Kinsgton (former Pfizer employee and founder and president of a 20 years old medical devices marketing company) found that the company that makes the adjuvants for the two main North American Covid-19 vaccines makers is a Chinese company named SinoPEG, (PEG is polyethylene Glycol) which also makes a "PEG Functionalized reduced graphene oxide" which basically is a graphene ribbon in which the functional groups are PEG molecules. PEG is a synthetic lipid-like chain, that can easily go through cell membranes. Most likely the "nanolipid delivery" technology is a pegylated GO and is present in all the vaccines. A paper from 2013 already proposed that PEGylated GO was the best delivery method for getting RNA inside cells.

[link to pubs.rsc.org (secure)]

ok so i see a lot of people making excuses for why we dont have an isolated virus, so still no proof of it, and now we just wouldnt expect to see proof, because its too small, or too fragile, or bla bla bla.

so many ridiculous claims, the virus flies through the air, sometimes it sits on surfaces.
all unfalsifiable BS claims based on NO observed phenomenon.
nothing to see here?

Too many inconsistencies. They are lying. It does not exist.

Parasite infected minds mired in scientism are more dangerous than they realize.

Too many inconsistencies. They are lying. It does not exist.

How is this thread not pinned?

Well, I gave it a lin request.

Let's hope it gets it.

It definitely gets a 5* from me.