Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79550048 United Kingdom 11/30/2021 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
burneracct
User ID: 81124368 United States 11/30/2021 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Even if you did You can’t publish it. That is all patented and copyright material This is not a natural virus. It is a patented man made virus. Your not allowed to distribute intellectual property. Pfizer redefining rare. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75092756 United States 11/30/2021 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sensible Coward
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Logan Five
User ID: 78753427 Germany 11/30/2021 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. Then it will be no problem at all for you to supply a cite for that bold statement. Do so here: Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Logan Five
User ID: 78753427 Germany 11/30/2021 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Out of curiosity, if covid isn’t real, what the fuck am I sick with? Lol Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75092756 I would guess poor lifestyle choices and delusion. The common cold. Possibly enhanced by trained bats, or unicycling monkeys. :chyna: Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81362721 Sweden 11/30/2021 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36224241 United States 11/30/2021 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73598641 United States 11/30/2021 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73598641 United States 11/30/2021 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Actually, now that I think about it, what do you guys think Fauchi was doing in that Wuhan lab when they were conducting research? If you don't think viruses exists as science knows them now like what is even the argument? are you saying they were just wasting that money doing nothing? |
Free me
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Actually, now that I think about it, what do you guys think Fauchi was doing in that Wuhan lab when they were conducting research? If you don't think viruses exists as science knows them now like what is even the argument? are you saying they were just wasting that money doing nothing? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73598641 Yeah like any drug dealer. High return on investment$$$ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36224241 United States 11/30/2021 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation the PCR test was calibrated using influenza they are discontinuing it on Dec 1st because it can't differentiate between covid and the flu. so tell me again who has covid? 2 + 2 = |
Ben Band
User ID: 80957975 United States 11/30/2021 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Feathery
User ID: 78686355 11/30/2021 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation I've posted this so many times and I never get a response. I have an Uncle who won a noble in Virology. His specialty area of expertise was Artificial Intelligence. There is no such thing as a "virus". Humans are the virus. The study of Virology is the study of your human cells and how to manipulate and kill them. You are the Virus. Humans are the Virus. The study of Virology is the study of how many ways to kill the human race. That's what it is. Tomfoolery |
Free me
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation I've posted this so many times and I never get a response. Quoting: Feathery I have an Uncle who won a noble in Virology. His specialty area of expertise was Artificial Intelligence. There is no such thing as a "virus". Humans are the virus. The study of Virology is the study of your human cells and how to manipulate and kill them. You are the Virus. Humans are the Virus. The study of Virology is the study of how many ways to kill the human race. That's what it is. That's exactly right. A virus in the eyes of whom is the question. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79471368 Singapore 11/30/2021 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation I've posted this so many times and I never get a response. Quoting: Feathery I have an Uncle who won a noble in Virology. His specialty area of expertise was Artificial Intelligence. There is no such thing as a "virus". Humans are the virus. The study of Virology is the study of your human cells and how to manipulate and kill them. You are the Virus. Humans are the Virus. The study of Virology is the study of how many ways to kill the human race. That's what it is. Obvious desperate attention whore us obvious. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79578855 Canada 11/30/2021 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! The virus is real you stupid twits. I'm tired of this forum and everyone being completely full of shit spreading misinformation. [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] [link to fullfact.org (secure)] [link to sunnybrook.ca (secure)] [link to brighterworld.mcmaster.ca (secure)] |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 40230781 United States 11/30/2021 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Koch's Postulates Quoting: beeches have they been fulfilled for this? simplest idea ever. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Cool. I have heard of that but never looked it up before. It is common sense and strikingly similar to the requirements I posted in the first post by way of pure reasoning. Koch's postulates are the following: The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture. The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism. The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 40230781 United States 11/30/2021 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Nope. There's no such thing as a contagious virus. The "cold and flu season" happens because the toxins that TPTB are always assaulting us with become more difficult for the human immune system to deal with when the amount of sunlight people get drops during the winter months, thus causing the Vitamin D level in their blood to drop commensurately. If people would just take 10,000 IU's of Vitamin D per day they're never get a cold or flu, but of course their brainwashed doctors believe that amount of Vitamin D is toxic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81312608 I agree with 90% of this. I am not convinced that there is NO ENTITY that can weaken people, but rather that "viruses" exist as partial protein or DNA/RNA fragments... Stay with me. No such virus as covid 19 But there is, I think, a spike protein. Proteins can open cells and get things inside by bonding to receptors, in this case ace 2. Spike protein, by contagion or injection will fuck you up (particularly like you said if low vit C+D) and Fuck with you on a cellular level. The whole thing was a farce to get to the vax, so everything up until then was rebranding and false positives. (Hence no excess deaths in 2020) That is the best summary I can do without devoting more time than I can spare now. Agree? Disagree? Comments? Modifications? Am I wrong somewhere? Let's get to the bottom of this shit. Last Edited by Dr. Feelgood on 11/30/2021 12:13 PM Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 40230781 United States 11/30/2021 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation This thread blew up over night! Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts, or even your rants on the subject. All I seek is the truth. If you feel like you can help me or anyone else get closer to the truth, please explain. Let's figure this shit out! Last Edited by Dr. Feelgood on 11/30/2021 12:15 PM Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50777178 United Kingdom 11/30/2021 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 40230781 United States 11/30/2021 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! The virus is real you stupid twits. I'm tired of this forum and everyone being completely full of shit spreading misinformation. [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] [link to fullfact.org (secure)] [link to sunnybrook.ca (secure)] [link to brighterworld.mcmaster.ca (secure)] I don't have time to read all those right now, so just post the method which isolated it without computer sequencing or monkey/bovine cells. Then we can review and see. Easy enough, right? Thus far numerous people have posted links and every one I have reviewed have been computer sequenced genomes. Read the OP. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 40230781 United States 11/30/2021 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Actually, now that I think about it, what do you guys think Fauchi was doing in that Wuhan lab when they were conducting research? If you don't think viruses exists as science knows them now like what is even the argument? are you saying they were just wasting that money doing nothing? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73598641 Spike protein (bioweapon) Maybe vax for extra cash grab Pocket the rest of the money. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
d1k
User ID: 48344903 United States 11/30/2021 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation 4 pages and still no proof. Link us an official study or paper showing this has been isolated. Last I heard there have been court cases regarding this and no evidence was provided to the court. |
Free me
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
chosendood
User ID: 63268826 United States 11/30/2021 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2. [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] [link to blog.nomorefakenews.com (secure)] |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 11/30/2021 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Red Hot Chilean Pepe
User ID: 79780291 Chile 11/30/2021 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Read it really carefully and you will see that they isolated a coronavirus and then found it had matches for “the known sequence of SARS CoV 2”. That’s not an isolation of the SARS CoV 2. All great truths begin as Blasphemies. G.B.S. GLP is like a diamond mine of information, in the sense that you have to shovel mountains of crap to find the diamonds, but it's still worth the pain. |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 11/30/2021 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Free me
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |