Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation | |
mindmeme
User ID: 77877380 United States 11/30/2021 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation Isolated virus available for research here [link to www.beiresources.org (secure)] |
laughnow12
User ID: 63881734 United States 11/30/2021 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation of course it has. Quoting: notsofastmr it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated. if it hasn't then how are they doing this [link to genxpro.net (secure)] No it hasnt. More importantly there is no vaccine for Covid. Only gene therapy. |
Make Free Speech Great Again
User ID: 80554853 United States 11/30/2021 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. If viruses could not be isolated at as you maintain (regardless of if they are truly what they're purported to be), then Koch's never would have come up with his Postulates, and it wouldn't have been a standard for over a hundred years.. so nice try The real trick is to learn to think critically; ask better and more questions. Don't accept anything at face value. Be sure you're making healthy decisions, getting adequate rest and spending proper time reflecting on things. |
humbird
User ID: 73158440 United States 11/30/2021 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation of course it has. Quoting: notsofastmr it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated. if it hasn't then how are they doing this [link to genxpro.net (secure)] Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. I wish I could remember which podcast I listened to, in which a Nobel prize doctor explained that the whole issue of Rona not being sequenced was a moot point. It is not sequenceable. It's not relevant. He explained why in actual scientific terms. Which I also forget. But it made sense at the time. I think it was one of the "frontline doctors." Good organization. "Aside from the small band of Forteans scattered around the world, nobody seems to notice all aspects of this phantasmagoria." John Keel |
PatrikC325
User ID: 80518524 United States 11/30/2021 08:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation of course it has. Quoting: notsofastmr it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated. if it hasn't then how are they doing this [link to genxpro.net (secure)] Modeling! RNA-Seq is the most comprehensive high-throughput sequencing-based approach for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of entire transcriptomes of model and non-model organisms. Fragmented cDNA is sequenced, the resulting sequences (“reads”) are mapped and compared to known genomes or transcriptomes. For non-model organisms, the reads are assembled and annotated for example to protein databases or other transcriptomes. Quantification of the RNAs or contigs is achieved by counting the corresponding fragments after annotation to a known genome or transcriptome or after de novo assembly and annotation to the Swissprot /TREMBL protein-database. As full-length transcripts can be analyzed, the technique detects splicing-variants, SNPs and indels, transcription start sites and alternative poly-adenylation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3722616 United States 11/30/2021 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation |
Make Free Speech Great Again
User ID: 80554853 United States 11/30/2021 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation It appears none of these actually meet Koch's definition of an isolate: "Each vial contains approximately 0.1 mL of spin-clarified cell lysate and supernatant from Homo sapiens lung adenocarcinoma cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, isolate hCoV-19/USA-NJ-CVD124/2020." "Note: If homogeneity is required for your intended use, please purify prior to initiating work." Last Edited by Make Free Speech Great Again on 11/30/2021 08:14 AM The real trick is to learn to think critically; ask better and more questions. Don't accept anything at face value. Be sure you're making healthy decisions, getting adequate rest and spending proper time reflecting on things. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81363389 11/30/2021 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: notsofastmr you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. If viruses could not be isolated at as you maintain (regardless of if they are truly what they're purported to be), then Koch's never would have come up with his Postulates, and it wouldn't have been a standard for over a hundred years.. so nice try Name one “virus” that has met Koch’s Postulates. I’ll wait......... |
SaveUSa
User ID: 80947256 United States 11/30/2021 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation in some way of making a start to this. Quoting: notsofastmr can we establish some self evident truths and see where that leads us. my offering is that it's self evident there is a genetic sequence that is being matched on the rapid home test kits. (not PCR). sometimes there is a positive, sometimes there is a negative. which means there is an agent that is present and not present. are we in agreement on this first principle? I'm not well researched on the rapid home tests, maybe someone else can chime in. As far as the PCR tests (still the most common test last time I checked) they check 37-40 gene pairs, and viruses are supposedly 30,000 - 40,000 gene pairs. Also the very short sequence that is checked matches over 90 normally occuring genomic segments from the human body and many other naturally occuring material including numerous other viruses or illnesses. So it seems to me like the PCR test, was chosen INTENTIONALLY for it's ability to generate false positives (particularly with higher replications) as they knew they could ramp up testing and raise replications thresholds to create cases as needed to push the narrative, or even lower if needed to keep things believable. You would be hard pressed to find a better plandemic tool. If you can provide a source on the rapid test method I will read it and get back to you. Based on PCR I do not believe that there has to be the presence of an actual "covid 19" entity, which seems to be what you are proposing if I am interpreting you correctly. I'm curious if the rapid test method offers some way of verifying that, now that you mention it though. I find it very curious that this is happening with a Corona virus as it is known there are hundreds, maybe thousands of them so if a test can test for Corona virus then a certain count of people will test positive, even in the absence of a new "novel corona virus" aka "covid 19." And its inventer curiously dies just months before this insanity begins. But fortunately not before providing his refutation of its proposed use in detecting any virus, as well as enlightening folks a bit on Fauci’s lack of competence. Gee, I wonder if there’s any correlation? Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
Make Free Speech Great Again
User ID: 80554853 United States 11/30/2021 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. If viruses could not be isolated at as you maintain (regardless of if they are truly what they're purported to be), then Koch's never would have come up with his Postulates, and it wouldn't have been a standard for over a hundred years.. so nice try Name one “virus” that has met Koch’s Postulates. I’ll wait......... You're misunderstanding me.. I'm not saying there has been. I was responding to someone who is defending the legitimacy of Covid-19 and viruses, while at the same time maintaining they cannot be isolated, and thus was pointing out, that according to the the champions of Germ Theory, they could be isolated, and therefore they have serious cognitive dissonance. Last Edited by Make Free Speech Great Again on 11/30/2021 08:20 AM The real trick is to learn to think critically; ask better and more questions. Don't accept anything at face value. Be sure you're making healthy decisions, getting adequate rest and spending proper time reflecting on things. |
SaveUSa
User ID: 80947256 United States 11/30/2021 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation good question, op Quoting: Tyndale18 this should be left up on the board for a few months until we have a satisfactory answer and especially if the answer is no . I'd like to know. I don't have any huge social media to bring this discussion to the forefront of our society, but I have been watching this whole thing closely since about Christmas 2019. If I had to bet, my money is on this entire thing having been based on PCR false positives and a computer sequenced imaginary "virus" with propaganda and politics steering the big retarded ship. Someone bet big that humankind is dumb enough to fall for it without ever even having to prove the big bad scary thing even exists and here we are. If anyone would like to prove me wrong, feel free. Unfortunately, it appears that they bet correctly for the most part. The issue isn’t “someone figuring it out” though. Plenty already have. The issue is that most of our government infrastructure designed to protect us from this bullshit has been compromised by those perpetrating the crimes. Time to focus on them. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
mindmeme
User ID: 77877380 United States 11/30/2021 08:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. If viruses could not be isolated at as you maintain (regardless of if they are truly what they're purported to be), then Koch's never would have come up with his Postulates, and it wouldn't have been a standard for over a hundred years.. so nice try Name one “virus” that has met Koch’s Postulates. I’ll wait......... From Koch's postulates [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] "More modern concepts in microbial pathogenesis cannot be examined using Koch's postulates, including viruses (which are obligate cellular parasites) and asymptomatic carriers." |
Make Free Speech Great Again
User ID: 80554853 United States 11/30/2021 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation it doesn't matter if it has been isolated, something is making people sick and it's not the flu or a cold Quoting: Anonymous Howard 60039567 they are calling this illness Covid If you don't think it real it's because you havn't had it ....YET, but you will get it sooner or later If you don't think it's real then you are a fucking Dumbass Have you ever heard of toxic overload? Do you realize in how many ways we're poisoned both by happenstance and deliberately? Have you ever researched the effects of radiation on the immune system, as demonstrated for instance in Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow? How about the effects of inadequate rest, too much stress, and improper diet on the immune system? How about when all these elements are combined? Just because people are getting sick en masse does not mean it's some novel virus, especially when all this corresponded with the roll-out of a new military grade radiation technology (5G), and which "coincidentally", it just happened wuhan was where the first towers were set up, the same place where "Covid" supposedly originated. [link to www.xinhuanet.com] Last Edited by Make Free Speech Great Again on 11/30/2021 08:28 AM The real trick is to learn to think critically; ask better and more questions. Don't accept anything at face value. Be sure you're making healthy decisions, getting adequate rest and spending proper time reflecting on things. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81365051 United States 11/30/2021 08:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation 37 box vans each with a catering logo on the sides. The roll open roofs controlled by a timer. Cylinders of Hydrogen gas laid flat and 3 large balloons and a 500' cable attached to the gadget. Parked in 36 cities and one labeled Uniform Service at Dimona. On Tuesday May 7th in a Tehran hotel the man sits eating lunch as the sirens sound through out the target being life to a stop for a minute. He glances at his watch as 37 balloons ascend. In a bright flash it is done. |
Dr-Know
User ID: 79859524 Spain 11/30/2021 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation PCR IS NOT A TEST !!!!! It is simply an AMPLIFICATION technique to obtain enough DNA to work with from a minuscule sample. My Guess is that they took a Corona virus and made Gene insertions into it. This is why they would never reveal the bug as it would be obvious. Dr Know |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78181252 United States 11/30/2021 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! Dr. Peter McCullough say it has. |
GLP Gadfly
User ID: 4999903 United States 11/30/2021 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79017631 United States 11/30/2021 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! So in other words, you want a magic sample analyzed with magic eyes. You know technology exists for a reason? Can you not trust any output from computers? Are you aware the whole fuckin world and any important metric is usually measured by a computer? That's like saying earthquakes don't exist because some guy can't pinpoint the next one by ear. That's like saying cooking a pie is completely impossible, solely because you won't let anyone use the stove to prove you wrong. If you refuse to use the technology that's used for the task, you can't complete the task. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80678862 United States 11/30/2021 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67846139 Netherlands 11/30/2021 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! Yes he was isolated for 11 years till november 2019 in Wuhan Bio lab 4 .... |
chrion777
User ID: 79167926 United States 11/30/2021 09:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing. Quoting: Dr. Feelgood I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample. So here is what I am asking for: No computer sequencing No computer generated genomes No computer generated "consensus genetic code" No monkey business, no bovine BS Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing. If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)... ...then PLEASE share this info with GLP. Bonus questions: Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ? How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data? Have it it folks. If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated. One way or another let's settle this shit! Ok, let's get the first part out of the the way. The first rtPCR test did not have a sample available because it relied on the genetic sequencing out of China first. *at that time* it had not been isolated by US labs. There are then numerous studies in different countries of it being Isolated . Second, the way most of the articles have isolated it is using VERO cell line (monkey cells) by culturing the cells and then when the virus replicates using a genetic sequencer on that culture. I don't know of any study using human cells (which would probably end up using the fetal cell line?). I'm not sure what you mean by 'computer sequencing'. I think it's this part that doesn't make any sense... "result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study," You want them to take a covid sample, replicate it in a human cell line, culture it and then reinfect another live human being with it? You get that would be extremely unethical to carry that experiment out. Also, what is the purpose. We know that entire families get infected. I know at least 20 famlies where most have come down with Covid. I know one person who was in ICU for a very long time (weeks) and one person who died (wife's step-mom's brother). People that argue that 'there is no virus' are insane. I can post plenty of links of the vero stem line studies but before I do wanted to put all that out there. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80276927 United States 11/30/2021 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. No. The code used to create the vaxx (in only 3 hours guise!) was posted in a Chinese medical chat room. The Chinese CDC didn't post it. Nobody knows who did. The safest assumption is that a stake holder posted it themselves. People are being injected with a vaxx based on a code that nobody knows where it came from or how they came up with it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80276927 United States 11/30/2021 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation of course it has. Quoting: notsofastmr it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated. if it hasn't then how are they doing this [link to genxpro.net (secure)] Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. I wish I could remember which podcast I listened to, in which a Nobel prize doctor explained that the whole issue of Rona not being sequenced was a moot point. It is not sequenceable. It's not relevant. He explained why in actual scientific terms. Which I also forget. But it made sense at the time. I think it was one of the "frontline doctors." Good organization. "I think I have smallpox but I'll try your mad-cow vaxx because you told me that it doesn't matter" I guess that works on some people... |
mondali2
User ID: 70368077 Thailand 11/30/2021 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation If there is no covid 19 virus, how is it that people that do not know each other, don't eat the same poisonous food, get sick when they come into contact with those who are sick with the virus. And have the same symptoms, such as loss of taste and/or smell etc. The hypothesis that there is no virus is absolutely preposterous to believe by any thinking person. Last Edited by mondali2 on 11/30/2021 09:31 AM mondali2 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79017631 United States 11/30/2021 09:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: notsofastmr you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. No. The code used to create the vaxx (in only 3 hours guise!) was posted in a Chinese medical chat room. The Chinese CDC didn't post it. Nobody knows who did. The safest assumption is that a stake holder posted it themselves. People are being injected with a vaxx based on a code that nobody knows where it came from or how they came up with it. How could you honestly believe that's how the vaccine was created and not feel like a moron? The global health community is going to base everything off a random string of data, no pushback whatsoever from absolutely any official health organization? A little critical thinking goes a long way. |
chrion777
User ID: 79167926 United States 11/30/2021 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation [link to wwwnc.cdc.gov (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81042569 "We isolated virus from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens from this patient" Nope. Used monkey and cow cells, then sequenced it with a computer. You fail. Thanks for playing. Whole-Genome Sequencing We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs. We used positive PCR amplicons individually for subsequent Sanger sequencing and also pooled them for library preparation by using a ligation sequencing kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, [link to nanoporetech.comExternal (secure)] Link), subsequently for Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing. We generated consensus nanopore sequences by using Minimap version 2.17 ( [link to github.comExternal (secure)] Link) and Samtools version 1.9 ( [link to www.htslib.orgExternal] Link). We generated consensus sequences by Sanger sequencing from both directions by using Sequencher version 5.4.6 ( [link to www.genecodes.comExternal (secure)] Link), and further confirmed them by using consensus sequences generated from nanopore sequencing. How about we flip the script a little bit. Show us a peer reviewed article where the standard for isolation of a pathogentic pandemic virus is to infect only a human cell line and then transfer that infection into a live host. Again there should be *zero* argument that there is an actual virus going around. Don't you know people who have gotten the unique signature illness from Covid "lack of taste/smell, dry cough, respiratory distress, fever, major fatigue". I know of at least 20 familes which is upwords of 60 people who have gotten Covid. My brother-in-law got it early on in Feb-2020; My best friend got it a few months ago and so did his wife. Several people I work with Many of my wife's friends Tons of people I have known since I was in my 20s. I can go on and on. Viruses replicate; Why would you even imply that there is some 'spike protein' moving from host to host without a virus. That's not what proteins do by themselves; that's what viruses do. The virus carries the spike. There's plenty of conspiracy to go on here, starting with the fact that the virus was genetically engineered; in my opinion created from Bat, Pangolin and using a few sequences from the HIV pseudovirus that they packaged into a live virus. They were doing research that is well documented using HIV pseudovirus subsystem (which is a common practice) but in this case they repackaged it into a live virus, not a psuedovirus. That is part of what allowed it to be so effective in human cells as well as cross-species. It could be lab leak or intentional, I have no way to know that. |
Sensible Coward
User ID: 79567175 United States 11/30/2021 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81365786 United States 11/30/2021 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
burneracct
User ID: 81124368 United States 11/30/2021 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation The pcr and vaccines are based of the RNA of the original gain of function study in Wuhan that Fauci denies vehemently. Fauci denies it while at the same time pushes the vaccine based off it. Pfizer redefining rare. |
Tanoros
User ID: 79649433 United States 11/30/2021 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation ... Quoting: Dr. Feelgood Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. It's genetic code has been isolate. However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell. Not true, there is a very simple process to isolate the fully intact virus. Currently the “genetic code” has been put together by scientists finding small isolated pieces of genetic material, and sequencing them via computer. However, it’s very possible to isolate the FULL virus, and then genetically sequence it. Why has this not been done? That’s the question. [link to ourfreesociety.com (secure)] This explains how a virus would be isolated, in addition you may be surprised to find out, measles itself was never isolated. OP, I don’t believe anyone will be able to provide that which you seek. Good thread, let’s see what comes up. Good luck all Last Edited by Tanoros on 11/30/2021 09:55 AM |