| Users Online Now: 1,271 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 47,482 | |
| Pageviews Today: 86,345 | Threads Today: 41 | Posts Today: 439 |
| 12:47 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,271 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 47,482 | |
| Pageviews Today: 86,345 | Threads Today: 41 | Posts Today: 439 |
| 12:47 AM | ||
Early Warning Videos From 1936, 1956 | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78313355  United States11/28/2021 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KingSkyWolf
 User ID: 78228247 United States11/28/2021 12:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a 'debunk' for the 1936 one; Quoting: Gorgol [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] Some parts are indeed very much the same But the wormy arms and general style was very common as cartoons were just starting, everybody was doing the same It's like Felix the Cat for me I don't think it's a valid debunk Back then, the main/only form of animation was cel animation. Essentially layered transparencies with different characters on each, laid over a background. Take a picture, change the cels, take a picture, change the cels. It was common for cel animations to be re-used in multiple stories with or without slight changes. Studios often did this to save money, and more importantly to keep iconic gestures of key characters exactly the same for branding etc. Think for yourself, and be free. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77277819  France11/28/2021 01:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| streetsahead
User ID: 76154099 United States11/28/2021 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81045405  Moldova11/28/2021 05:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81224151 11/28/2021 05:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I posted that first one a few weeks ago and people picked it apart as made recently. It just looked like an old 30's cartoon. Why don't they now? Can you link your post? I don't know for certain if the 1936 one is real or fake Why do they not show in the debunk-video HOW it's done? Just a short bit of it would suffice they were both debunked for having way to big refresh rate which appeared only after 1990 so there is no way a video from 1936 had this refresh rate. Both cartoons appeared on interwebz summer of 2020 without details to them. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78581905  United Kingdom11/28/2021 07:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81324870 United States11/28/2021 07:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Gorgol
(OP) User ID: 78275908  Netherlands11/28/2021 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exactly my point It only says debunked in the title Debunk claims need to be checked for validity lol By all means, ridiculing me for wanting to know HOW really shows who is the stupid one Gorgol -No Jab, No Jitter |
| Gorgol
(OP) User ID: 78275908 Netherlands11/28/2021 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a 'debunk' for the 1936 one; Quoting: Gorgol [link to www.bitchute.com (secure)] Some parts are indeed very much the same But the wormy arms and general style was very common as cartoons were just starting, everybody was doing the same It's like Felix the Cat for me I don't think it's a valid debunk Back then, the main/only form of animation was cel animation. Essentially layered transparencies with different characters on each, laid over a background. Take a picture, change the cels, take a picture, change the cels. It was common for cel animations to be re-used in multiple stories with or without slight changes. Studios often did this to save money, and more importantly to keep iconic gestures of key characters exactly the same for branding etc. Thanks, point taken Gorgol -No Jab, No Jitter |
| EightyEight
User ID: 81246318  Canada11/28/2021 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Gorgol
(OP) User ID: 78275908 Netherlands11/28/2021 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The voice on the 1956 is too high pitched for the 50s. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33029311 They had the best voice actors back then with deep voices not soy boys. The 50s was an optimistic time of incredible new technologies like rockets and the atom. This film is gloomy and it make predictions 70 years away? Man, they had singing that was gay as fuck back then too In the days that 'gay' meant happy and merry Last Edited by Gorgol on 11/28/2021 08:18 AM Gorgol -No Jab, No Jitter |
