Nova Scotia Judicial Review of mandates

Would it cover Ontario or do we have to do our own?

I noticed this article the other day.
[link to www.saltwire.com (secure)]
"Are Nova Scotians getting the full story on COVID vaccine safety?"

Last Edited by universum on 10/28/2021 07:52 AM

Update:

Going ahead March 21st 2022

First in Canada concerning Covid

[link to www.thecans.ca (secure)]

Boom

[link to www.cbc.ca (secure)]

I believe this is still the first on the radar for North America.

May want to watch / support this legal action so the implications can cross apply in your local area.

This is a huge opportunity for public truth

... The judge assigned to the review is known for their integrity.

This may be the beacon of light in the distance you want to guide you at home ...

Canadian lawyers say that about ALL judges. When push comes to shove, the court process in Canada is basically lawyers sucking judge cock to get ahead in their careers.

Lawyers and judges protect each other behind a "blue line" just like cops.

In Manitoba, a year ago, a judge with "high integrity" heard the Manitoba government doctor say under oath that AT LEAST 55% of positive PCR tests were completely non-infectious... The judge simply pretended he wasn't qualified to rule on the evidence and dismissed the case.

“The Applicant, Citizens’ Alliance of Nova Scotia (CANS), comes before this court seeking to engage the Judiciary to perform a vital and rigorous ‘check’ among the ‘checks and balances’ integral to Canada’s constitutional democracy. The Applicant is asking the Judicial branch of government to take a critical look at decisions and actions taken by the Executive branch of government to determine if they are reasonable and lawful” - C. Lazier, legal counsel

Justice Muise carefully considered each of CANS’ motions by applying the relevant legal tests which was very interesting to listen to for the lay person.

All motions were granted by the court; a much desired outcome for CANS and its members. The next milestone is the Respondents’ filing of the government’s record: the compilation of evidence, materials and process relied upon by the Respondents to generate the public health order and “Covid-vaccine” protocols imposed in the October 01, 2021 order and subsequent orders.

To reiterate: the below statements from CANS’ affidavit to the judge encompass the core reasons for pursuing this Judicial Review in relation to the Oct 01, 2021 order of the CMO which imposed proof of full vaccination requirements on the public.

Affidavit points:

CANS has undertaken the application for judicial review because actions taken and Orders, directives and mandates issued by provincial public health officials under the Health Protection Act in response to "COVID-19", and particularly the Order which is the subject of these proceedings, have adversely impacted CANS' ability to fulfill its vision and mission by, among other things, requiring the organization to ask for proof vaccination from would-be participants, which CANS considers an unacceptable violation of people's privacy and Charter rights.
CANS has, furthermore, undertaken the application for judicial review on behalf of its members whose daily lives, family activities, mental health, physical well-being, exercise of Charter rights and freedoms, employment, and social relations, have been adversely affected by the Order under review and for whom the Order has caused or may cause harm to their health and/or violation of their privacy and Charter rights.
Some of the grounds stated in the Judicial Review are:

The Order is unreasonable because it is not based on an internally coherent and rational chain of analysis, and because it is not defensible in light of the law and the facts, including facts clearly before the Respondents and demonstrated by the public statements and internal communication of their offices.
The Order is unreasonable because it institutes a coercive regime, effectively forcing the vaccination of persons 12 years of age and older in order for them to participate in normal, daily pursuits vital to their physical and mental well-being, thereby harming public health and infringing on individuals’ protected Charter right to life, liberty and security of the person (s. 7) and equality rights (s. 15).
The Order is unreasonable because it institutes Directives which require businesses and organizations to obtain from persons aged 12 and older, and in some circumstances to share without privacy safeguards, individuals’ personal health information (i.e., proof of vaccination) in contravention of the provincial Personal Health Information Act, and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.1993, c. 5, s. 1.

Full Update at link

[link to www.thecans.ca (secure)]

The goal is to get the win or exhaust all legal options before moving on to lawful options.

There is an order of operations that must be followed

1 combination to the lock

Pin request

Update:

[link to www.thecans.ca (secure)]

For Truth!