Anomalous Bluetooth address readings when people approach me and off as they walk away.

they are unique MAC address. Impossible to connect to, and only see them when vaccinated people are around.


Try it, go into your bluetooth when you're in public and notice all the MAC addresses? Newer phones don't show it.

You must be new at shilling. Jabbed people have been tested to emit a strong EM field, Bluetooth would be nothing in comparison.

I’ll have to try again when I get home out in the country. Like above poster I control all the electronics here and with only 2 people within 100’ and indoors behind stucco(wire mesh) I’m seeing 45 unknowns.

Which is strange all the speakers I’ve owned only had about a 25’ line of site range. Even standing in between would disrupt

And I’m only seeing UUIDs not MAC address

If this is indeed related to the "thing" in the vaxxed I wouldn't be surprised to find the signals being picked up in active 5G areas.

Explain what that means please. UUIDs.

[link to www.brighteon.com (secure)]

[link to www.brighteon.com (secure)]

Or is this some kind of new spying technique?

I have to go to the hospital later for a doctor's appointment. I'm downloading the app now. It should light up with all the vaxxed there.

I'll come back later & report what I find.

Why would one want to lead into a BS discussion that involves benign explanations, regardless of whether it’s in this site or anywhere else?

Not sure, unique identifier. Macs are always 0-9 and a-f in 4 hexadecimal octets. I’m seeing the same types as in original post.

I've been doing the same with a app Bluetooth Scanner, there are many unknown devices when around people. The vaxxed are connected to the internet of things. They are "E-Slaves" and don't even realize it.

What's the name of the app

I go back to work tomw and I know and talk with a lot of vax people, Ill try it out and let you all know

From Wikipedia (less than 50%)

Universal unique identifications
When generated according to the standard methods, UUIDs are, for practical purposes, unique. Their uniqueness does not depend on a central registration authority or coordination between the parties generating them, unlike most other numbering schemes. While the probability that a UUID will be duplicated is not zero, it is close enough to zero to be negligible.

Holy shit.

Have not seen any of these videos. Thank you all so much.

I just can’t believe lt and I’m the OP. There’s got to be a rational explanation for this.

Blowing me away.

It’s called curiosity troll, if you’d make an attempt at getting a life you wouldn’t have time to concern yourself with “BS” conversation. Now fuck off

I see.


So this is unusual in your environment which you control?

Ask them to take part in the experiment? That might work.

Get jabbed friends together and see what's what. Even the jabbed would be interested in the results of that.

There is one, problem is most people won’t like it. Please invest an hour of your life hearing the Carrie Madej interview I posted here brought from other thread. This has been on preparation for much longer than anyone could fathom.’

The foglets are working.

If you are arriving on this theory on your own, congrats. It has been recently discussed back in August/September.

There is a video of a russian hacker that manages to log onto some weird database.

and duck duck go --- Henry Mak Low -- there is an article on the website that dives into this.

Hell, I'm inclined to believe it's the vaxxed that are putting out these signals. Just want to see more evidence. That would definitely be an interesting experiment. It's really just a matter of someone being comfortable enough to ask a few vaxxed people to put their devices aside and be scanned, which is not something many folks are going to be comfortable with on either the scanner or scannee side.

Last Edited by Revbo™ on 10/18/2021 11:37 AM

No.

Ear buds
Watches
Tracking tiles on keys
Lots of stuff


Look at first four of Mac address to find out the manufacturer.

They will all probably be very recognizable.

If anything passive RFID is possible if the graphene oxide strands somehow self-assemble. No way on bluetooth, WiFi, NFC or chirp.

Something to keep in mind:

Bluetooth uses the 2.4 Ghz spectrum, along with almost every other basic consumer grade wireless technology. Hell, your microwave emits on 2.4 Ghz.

That's not to say there isn't something to this, but worth mentioning.

Yo Revbo, watch the Japanese blogger video posted earlier in this thread, he got a very controlled environment with an elder person that only had an old mobile phone on her and it was turned off for the test. This is for me a solid proof short of doing it within a Faraday cage with the person naked inside.

chinese wristbands / smart watches, Mi-band like (not "original" brand)
[link to www.bing.com (secure)]

Lol, you think up goofy ass stupid fucking shit and on a consistent basis. Fucking wierdo lol

What happens if you try to connect to them?