Anomalous Bluetooth address readings when people approach me and off as they walk away.

Thanks, it’s true, Letsfit smart watch, very cheap.

Sitting in my truck out in the middle of nowhere as I type this, nothing showing up with the screen showing pressures on.

Read the whole page, then get back to me

GET OFF YOUR ASS AND CHECK IT YOURSELF.

IT'S TRUE.

they're already paired to the car.
there is no reason for them to broadcast.

.

No need to get angry, I understood Sol-tari was trying to provide a rational explanation, which is not bad per se, and he was able to get across the point that there are much more Bluetooth emitting stuff than what one might think. This is important to know. Thanks to his insistence I also learnt a way to tell private (no need to register) MACs from public MACs (required to register). This allows for better discernment of what may be a true anomalous MAC address from a commercial one. For me the best evidence so far is the Jap video. The next step of confirmation requires much more preparation and I doubt will be possible to achieve it without some degree of preparation. It involves finding a location completely free of devices emitting MAC addresses, and asking a set of both known vaxxed and unvaxxed people to enter the area in their briefs, prior checking the briefs themselves aren’t Bluetooth emitter. The Japanese elder lady is a good approximation, but not fully conclusive yet. Albeit I have been told this is true, from people that has connections to military intelligence, but proving it for the average joe requires more than that.

no, it's past time to be angry.

i have a fucking government that can't speak
a single word of truth pushing a Kingsmen
movie scheme of evil and this moron keeps
quoting a handbook instead checking it out

i had SEVENTY FIVE address in a bar Ive known
for several years and it must be watches
and fitbits etc. fucking ridiculous. even
if EVERY SINGLE PERSON had a watch AND a fitbit
i still have FIFTEEN more unknown devices.


.

As I said in my last post, we were in Texas for a week. We stayed at the Hilton overlooking the river walk. We also stayed in Galveston a couple nights before.

And I began noticing something very strange with regard to my phone Bluetooth screen.

As people approached in the Gondolas below us, I got these very weak Bluetooth signals. In Galveston, we stayed in a hotel that was near the beach. As some people walked by, up would pop a very weak Bluetooth signal. As they continued walking away, the signal would drop off my phone.

So I downloaded from the App Store, Bluetooth RSSI Analyzer. Wow, did that prove to be a good move.

It shows cell phones and different known types of Bluetooth Devices. Even TPMS tire pressure car Bluetooth signals.

But that doesn’t account for the Bluetooth signals I got as people floated by on Gondolas. Yes I saw their cell phone signals too.

But there were these very weak Bluetooth signals that accompanied some of them. And once they floated by, out of view, the Bluetooth signals dropped away again.

My question is, is it possible for people who have been jabbed to to be sending a very weak Bluetooth signal?

Please download this app and try it for yourselves. Go into a store or someplace where a lot of people gather and look at all the very weak unknown Bluetooth signals that you begin to get. And then walk outside and notice they all began to drop away.

Could be their key Fobs, their cell phones, that’s true. Could be a lot of things.

:rere23:

Download that app or one like it. It just takes a few seconds. Do it for yourself. If you find a better app please let me know.

The Jap blogger posted another video and blog, but this one is doesn’t lend it to translation as all texts are posted as images. Hope he posts an English version soon.

i spent more time on trying to decipher what is
going on. both bars i tested are bounded on
2 sides by 4 traffic lanes, 3rd side is a
parking lot and 4th is strip mall.

so there's 200 ft of clearance and walls.

i also tested 3 different BT scanners in hopes
that it may be an app issue. all three gave
me similar results.

i also tested at my house. like the bars, my
house has streets on 2 sides and park on the
3rd. when i tested near those, i only picked
up my known devices.

but when i tested in my front yard, i picked
up 5 "unknown devices", presumably my neighbors.

i thought perhaps passive BT state was causing
misreads but could make it happen.

i also tested at a restaurant tonight. about 50
customers and 10 staff but i found well over
200 devices.

im writing a blog up with screen shots.
.

Transmitting (what the 'patient' would need to do), takes a bit of power, or the person has to be very close, as they are only needing to transmit a few lines of data, but whatever, there are far better protocols than Bluetooth, not the mention even the most advanced modern smallest Bluetooth transmitter is far bigger than you could comfortably even swallow.

More is the point about Bluetooth and other mobile security that even when it is supposed is switched off, is switched on.

Transmitting (what the 'patient' would need to do), takes a bit of power, or the person has to be very close, as they are only needing to transmit a few lines of data, but whatever, there are far better protocols than Bluetooth, not the mention even the most advanced modern smallest Bluetooth transmitter is far bigger than you could comfortably even swallow.

More is the point about Bluetooth and other mobile security that even when it is supposed is switched off, is switched on.

i spent more time on trying to decipher what is
going on. both bars i tested are bounded on
2 sides by 4 traffic lanes, 3rd side is a
parking lot and 4th is strip mall.

so there's 200 ft of clearance and walls.

i also tested 3 different BT scanners in hopes
that it may be an app issue. all three gave
me similar results.

i also tested at my house. like the bars, my
house has streets on 2 sides and park on the
3rd. when i tested near those, i only picked
up my known devices.

but when i tested in my front yard, i picked
up 5 "unknown devices", presumably my neighbors.

i thought perhaps passive BT state was causing
misreads but could make it happen.

i also tested at a restaurant tonight. about 50
customers and 10 staff but i found well over
200 devices.

im writing a blog up with screen shots.
.

"could NOT make it happen". i tested with my
laptop, 2nd phone, headsets both on and off,
and with BT enabled and disabled. i thought
perhaps they give off some erroneous ghost
image but i could not create an "unknown device".

I’ve done the same—unplug devices—and they didn’t go away. Nothing I can do makes them go away except gaining distance from them. Then back again. And there they are. Humans.

And not all humans.

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

Lo and behold, Karen Kingston kind of confirms that the vaxxes could be doing all what we are suspecting they do, and this comes from the Moderna patent and related/supporting patents.

So, where are the shills now?

OMG. please learn some tech before posting dumb shit like this. learn to use search engines.

Transmitting (what the 'patient' would need to do), takes a bit of power, or the person has to be very close, as they are only needing to transmit a few lines of data, but whatever, there are far better protocols than Bluetooth, not the mention even the most advanced modern smallest Bluetooth transmitter is far bigger than you could comfortably even swallow.

More is the point about Bluetooth and other mobile security that even when it is supposed is switched off, is switched on.

REMEMBER. What is now being studied above ground and advertised as state of the art research soon to be commercially available has already been done under covert black budget a decade ago or more.

Injectable computers can broadcast from inside the body

<50%

This platform has enabled a variety of sensors that can fit inside the human body, made possible by several breakthroughs in ultra-low power computing.

Profs. David Blaauw and David Wenzloff are designing millimeter-scale ultra-low-power sensing systems that can be injected into the body through a syringe. Unlike other radios of this size, these new devices are able to broadcast through the human body to an external receiver.

[link to ece.engin.umich.edu (secure)]

FROM 2019

Teeny-Tiny Bluetooth Transmitter Runs on Less Than 1 Milliwatt Bluetooth Low Energy data packets can now be sent by millimeter-size IoT motes

<50%

Engineers at the University of Michigan have now built the first millimeter-scale stand-alone device that speaks BLE. Consuming just 0.6 milliwatts during transmission, it would broadcast for 11 years using a typical 5.8-millimeter coin battery. Such a millimeter-scale BLE radio would allow these ant-size sensors to communicate with ordinary equipment, even a smartphone.

[link to spectrum.ieee.org (secure)]

Wireless, power-free and implantable nanosystem for resistance-based biodetection

Abstract
In-vivo devices and systems are extensively used in medical field to real-time detect and adjust the physiological status of human being, but supplying energy in-vivo for these devices and systems is still a great challenge. In this work, we first developed a new kind of wireless nanogenerator (WLNG) based on biocompatible BZT-BCT nanowires (NWs).

[link to www.sciencedirect.com (secure)]

I’m using BLE Scanner and Blue Hound. I’m currently in a very small campground and I get about one per camper/RV. Many are watches, PC’s, phones, etc. There are a few anonymous devices, probably headphones, could be pacemakers? I think a lot of campers have BT stereos. I’ll scan people as they go by and report back.

Side note I just looked at some new battery powered drills and they have bluetooth. My generators have bluetooth. BT is everywhere.

Update: I went to lunch in a hippy town with lots of vaxtards and all I found was a plethora of iphones and watches. I could scan and then pick out the owner easily.

No low level signals except for far away devices.

Update: I went to lunch in a hippy town with lots of vaxtards and all I found was a plethora of iphones and watches. I could scan and then pick out the owner easily.

No low level signals except for far away devices.