ANY WASHINGTON STATE LAWYER WANT TO WORK WITH ME PRO BONO TO STOP the WA STATE COVID VACCINE SEGREGATION MANDATES?

I also live in this beautiful state, that is unfortunately ran by a-holes. I wish you luck.

Well your signature might be useful.

Best of luck! Keep us in the loop.

Thanks. There is enough evidence out there now to do this.

I live here too! You can have my signature if you need it!

Thanks, when this gets off the ground, we'll figure out an appropriate way to do that.

Well, you better get on it fast. Inslee has already been to court about the mask mandates and he said it was only a suggestion. It got thrown out of court.

[link to www.freedomfoundation.com (secure)]

He is also apparently looking to hire guards for his new COVID camps.

[link to www.governmentjobs.com (secure)]
The state Isolation and Quarantine facility was created for individuals who are not Washington residents but are traveling in our state and test positive for COVID-19 or who have been exposed to someone who tests positive and do not have a residence or other location in which to spend their 10-14 day isolation or quarantine period.

p.s. scientists and doctors - it's best to stop making false statements publicly. The evidence out there is outweighing your words.

Are these King County mandates or WA state mandates? And where can we find out more about them? I am a nurse who is already planning on taking legal action against my employer & WA state for enforcing a vaccine mandate when I work alone from home & do not give direct patient care at all.

I left Washington for Texas in Jan 2021 and it was the best thing I could have done. Once they voted Inslee back in office, I no longer had faith in the citizens of the state.

green karma
Have you searched for disbarred attorneys?

There are brilliant people that won't kowtow, if you look.

There's also a website that let's you ask bar attorneys to work for free- helped me with the FTC when they froze my $ for being mean to bankers over the telephone.

Good luck

There will probably be nothing fast about it. It will be slow grind.

And those WA COVID camps are for people who catch COVID and are living with a lot of other people, and need to isolate.

They don't need camps to round people up. They just kill them in the hospitals. Why store the person before hand?

Great idea! thanks

King county has a mandate where you need a COVID vaccine to get into bars, live music events, etc.

I don't even know what other mandates are going on statewide, but I'm sure some of them could be challenged as well.

====


your job at home....are you saying the GOVERNMENT is requiring that you get COVID vaccinated, in order to work from home?? Or is that coming from your employer?

How does it feel to be in Texas?

Amazing how many GLPers live in this rainy green and gorgeous state! Now if we could just get the politics right!

By green I mean the evergreens, not political. LOL

Everything here seems to have been overstepped and unfortunate. Good time to get the facts into the open and stop going in circles with falsities.

Best wishes, Butch - want it to go well for you!

Thanks.

ALso.....and any one of us can call the governor of their state, and leave a recorded message for him her. Just leave a polite message about what you know about the COVID shot and mandates, etc. It's okay to give your opinion to your governor.

Last Edited by Butch DeFeo on 10/06/2021 01:29 PM

No, this is from Jay Inslee. He states any nurse "providing a service" must be vaccinated or let go. And since nurses working remotely from home are still "providing a service" we are still required to get the vax unless we get medical or religious exemptions. And we all know those are next to impossible to get. My religious exemption was already denied & I am working on my next legal steps. Any nurses that do not get vaxxed have to move out of state if they want to continue working as a nurse.

Yeah all this unreasonable bullshit needs to be challenged.

Good luck with that.

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

“Lawyers” are foreign agents, that require a “foreign agent registration” upon entering “court”

Lawyers can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)

Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4,

Attorney & client:

The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.

The “state bar”

Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution.

There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the BAR is attempting. “BAR” members have invaded all branches of govt. & are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!

Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925)

"The practice of law is an occupation of common right." “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance.”

Oh and can’t forget

The USDC are legislative courts typically proceeding in legislativemode. See American Insurance v. 356 Bales of Cotton, 1 Pet. 511, 7 L.Ed. 242 (1828) (C.J. Marshall’s seminal ruling); Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298, 312 (1922) (the USDC IS NOT a true United States court established under Article III!); and 28 U.S.C. §§ 88, 91, 132, 152, 171, 251, 458, 461, 1367.

Legislative courts are not required to exercise the Article III guarantees required of constitutional courts. See Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co., 261 U.S. 428 (1923); Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner, 274 U.S. 145 (1927); Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311 (1928); Ex parte Bakelite Corporation, 279 U.S. 438 (1929); Federal Radio Commission v. General Electric Co., 281 U.S. 464 (1930); Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Co. v. United States, 285 U.S. 382 (1932); O’Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516 (1933); Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962); Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982).

Prof. Emeritus Kenneth L. Karst, on the faculty of the UCLA Law School, summed it up nicely as follows:

In essence a legislative court is merely an administrative agency with an elegant name. While Congress surely has the power to transfer portions of the business of the federal judiciary to legislative courts, a wholesale transfer of that business would work a fundamental change in the status of our independent judiciary and would seem vulnerable to constitutional attack.

“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory belonging to the united States. The jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of that judicial power which is conferred in the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.” — Harvard Law Review, Our New Possessions. page 481.

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it; an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed … An unconstitutional law is void.” (16 Am. Jur. 2d, Sec. 178)

“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

“An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but isillegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.” – Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879)

“An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, in legal contemplation, IS AS INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED.“ – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256

Same here and I can probably get some of my neighbors to sign a petition too.

"Every man is supposed to know the law. A party who makes a contract [or enters into a franchise, which is also a contract] with an officer [of the government] without having it reduced to writing is knowingly accessory to a violation of duty on his part. Such a party aids in the violation of the law." [Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 (1877)]

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states: "No State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." The individual's right to contract is unlimited and no State may interfere with that right.


"Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them." Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

"Congress may not, by any definition it may adopt, conclude the matter, since it cannot by legislation alter the Constitution." Eisner v. McComber, 252 U.S. 189 at 207.

Stock v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 289 In Interest of M.V., 288 Ill.App.3d 300, 681 N.E.2d 532 (1st Dist. 1997) "Where a court's power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the structures of the statute." "The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent contract." see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “...every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.”

“The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.” W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452

Inslee stole it from Culp. Three or so counties do not represent the majority of the state.

Yea, "we the governed" are pissed at the stolen election of our true governor. Not that asshole who is there now.

Thread: DOCTOR SAYS THERE HAVE BEEN NO DEATHS WITH COVID SHOTS: WA STATE DEPT OF HEALTH WEBINAR PUBLISHED: Busting COVID-19 Myths -

Dr. Corey in this video, says there have been no COVID shot related deaths: He says this at about 5:11



Last Edited by Butch DeFeo on 10/06/2021 06:16 PM