Flat or round earth? Riddle me this..

What insanity....The burden of proof is upon the one making the claim. You are claiming that gravity exist. You are using the magical response of gravity to defund your delusions, yet can provide no real science to back those claims. Your observations are dependent upon a false view of reality.

Your observations are easily explained by density.

I don't need to prove the existence of gravity. You are the one saying my answer was wrong because gravity doesn't exist. I say to you prove it.

show curved water

in the SR-71 video, does the plane maintain level flight or adjust as it flies around the curve of earth?

Same with submarines.
At periscope depth, do they maintain level or adjust?

Railroad tracks are flat or contour the curve?

More insanity.....
Not how it works, there is old legal maxim..... the burden of proof is upon the one making the claim.

If your going to claim gravity exist and use it to magically answer questions, then you have to provide some real demonstrable science to back those claims or it means you have no real science backing you.....which you don't.

Burden of Proof
[link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]

Same conflation of ontology and epistemology we always read here. If you were capable of retaining anything of use I would suggest a philosophy 101 course.
Do your specific branch of family tree a favor, go to the top of the highest building , jump off, while the ground is rushing up at you, you can contemplate the epistemological justifications of believing something is pulling you toward the ground, while providing a eugenics service to the world

we know the earth is round because we can see its shadow on the moon, and that shadow is a circle. can you explain that?

A lunar eclipse is caused by a dark body, that the ancient Indians called “RAHU”, passing over the moon. It has nothing to do with the Earth’s shadow…

A lunar eclipse is caused by a dark body, that the ancient Indians called “RAHU”, passing over the moon. It has nothing to do with the Earth’s shadow…

A lunar eclipse is caused by a dark body, that the ancient Indians called “RAHU”, passing over the moon. It has nothing to do with the Earth’s shadow…

Why do rockets NEVER go straight up, always curve and never seem to go into space?

Why dont planes on auto pilot fly off into space? If 'recently' invented GPS keeps planes at a certain level above ground, why doesnt the plane go up and down following the drop and fall of the ground?


Why has NASA been proven to have faked film and pictures? Why would they need to do that?

Why is it illegal to fly over antarctica? Why is it illegal to explore antarctica?

Why do planes follow weird routes why looking at them on a globe, but make total sense when looking at a flat earth map?


.

Same conflation of ontology and epistemology we always read here. If you were capable of retaining anything of use I would suggest a philosophy 101 course.
Do your specific branch of family tree a favor, go to the top of the highest building , jump off, while the ground is rushing up at you, you can contemplate the epistemological justifications of believing something is pulling you toward the ground, while providing a eugenics service to the world

More insanity.....
Not how it works, there is old legal maxim..... the burden of proof is upon the one making the claim.

If your going to claim gravity exist and use it to magically answer questions, then you have to provide some real demonstrable science to back those claims or it means you have no real science backing you.....which you don't.

Burden of Proof
[link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]

Keep telling yourself that the earth is a spinning cannon ball flying through space at absurd speeds when you have no real science to back up those claims. You clowns come across as more absurd every single day. LOL


I'm done, I've proven yet again that globeclowns have no evidence to back their claims....none.

Since your such an expert pilot you should have no problem answering the following challenge....


Debunk this video....feel free to use all the advanced math, physics, and science you want. Please leave out the usual mental leaps of logic the globeclowns usually use. LOL

What? No one knows?

The flats have invaded this forum. Several threads in the last few days.

Pharmacies are running low on SSRI's too.

Using the same calculator as in the video, you can show that if the SR-71 goes ten miles, it only needs to drop 67 feet. That's a rounding error. And all it needs to do is to keep doing that.

Using the original number from the video assumes that the plane dives straight toward the final point, which is absurd since it would plow into the Earth first.

You're having issues with the maths. 10 miles would result in a drop of 800 feet, which it travels in about 17 seconds ... so about 2800 feet per minute.

NASA has saved us all from our on stupidity. Thank god they never pointed a live camera at the earth when they left for the earth. The electronics for satellites operate for 40 years, incredible. GPS is a miracle,33 satellites all non effected by relativity. NASA saved us.

If you are on the fence, research Eric Dubay on YouTube or elsewhere…he gives a fairly thorough overview of flat Earth and proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.