BREAKING!!!! Supreme court rules forced vaccines constitutional. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80449342 Netherlands 09/21/2021 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78393032 United States 09/21/2021 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80216159 United States 09/21/2021 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Secretizer
User ID: 78467371 United States 09/21/2021 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anubis72
User ID: 80048599 United States 09/21/2021 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That whole 10th Amendment thing, and even then the idea that because the Supreme court says a state can forcibly inject something into your body you disagree with is some how lawful or moral is ridiculous. The Supreme Court could rule tomorrow and give that right to the Federal Government and I would still refuse. Anubis |
ProfessorWhistleTitz
User ID: 80261190 United States 09/21/2021 01:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. Yeah you can thank that dumb bitch Amy coney Barrett for reinforcing this sinister satanic shit. Actually I take that back.. Amy comey Barrett is no dope and knows EXACTLY what she was doing… IS doing. These people are evil. |
LightShines
User ID: 70851936 United States 09/21/2021 01:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah you can thank that dumb bitch Amy coney Barrett for reinforcing this sinister satanic shit. Actually I take that back.. Amy comey Barrett is no dope and knows EXACTLY what she was doing… IS doing. These people are evil. Quoting: ProfessorWhistleTitz Isnt it great to have 7 roman catholic supreme court justices in protestant america. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80449342 Netherlands 09/21/2021 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah you can thank that dumb bitch Amy coney Barrett for reinforcing this sinister satanic shit. Actually I take that back.. Amy comey Barrett is no dope and knows EXACTLY what she was doing… IS doing. These people are evil. Quoting: ProfessorWhistleTitz Isnt it great to have 7 roman catholic supreme court justices in protestant america. dude, they're catholics only on paper they're all skulls and bones club, fake Christians also they're not Catholics but Jesuits, which is a cover name for the Temple of Solomon movement, you're fucking welcome |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80892914 United States 09/21/2021 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LightShines
User ID: 70851936 United States 09/21/2021 01:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah you can thank that dumb bitch Amy coney Barrett for reinforcing this sinister satanic shit. Actually I take that back.. Amy comey Barrett is no dope and knows EXACTLY what she was doing… IS doing. These people are evil. Quoting: ProfessorWhistleTitz Isnt it great to have 7 roman catholic supreme court justices in protestant america. dude, they're catholics only on paper they're all skulls and bones club, fake Christians also they're not Catholics but Jesuits, which is a cover name for the Temple of Solomon movement, you're fucking welcome Yeah, they are catholics. Thats what I said. |
Depluribus Unum
User ID: 80866986 United States 09/21/2021 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. WRONG. I am so sick of this lie. This ruling FORCED HIM TO PAY THE FINE, NOT TAKE THE INJECTION. He never took the injection, and never served jail time. It is not lawful to force someone to take a vaccine, but it is lawful to levy a fine in lieu. I will gladly pay whatever fine is issued. From many, covfefe |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80902257 United States 09/21/2021 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. All the more disgusting for all these right wing idiots constantly digging up the grave of the big H and laying all their American Empire nonsense on him. They NEVER mandated vaccines, they NEVER mandated experimental gene therapy injections, they NEVER mandated masks or presumably ever even suggested such a thing. Your precious holy America, destroyer of evil, had already been forcing sterilization and vaccination legally for over 20 years before "they" came into power. Your precious holy America had already been poisoning people in mass "vaccination" experiments in the 20s. There is so much more to it. You people think the "media" and "deep state" lie to you about every little thing EXCEPT for the biggest lie of all, the one most important to [[[them]]], the ones surrounding Germany from 1933-1945, its ruling political party, and its ruler. Shame on you and you deserve everything thats happening to you, because you insist on compounding your errors all the way into the 11th hours. |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 68236614 Canada 09/21/2021 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That was the Eugenics era. SC in 1920's Buck one, you're probably talking Jacobson. WELL ITS NOT LEGAL ANYMORE. HITLER PROCLAIMED WORLD WIDE ANNOUNCEMENTS ADMIRATION FOR THOSE EUGENICS RULINGS AND BASED HIS ENTIRE EUGENICS PROGRAM ON THEM. SO, AFTER THE WAR, THEY WERE SCRAPPED AND THE NUREMBURG CODE AND INFORMED CONSENT BECAME THE LAW. In fact, Robert Barnes, Constitutional and Criminal Lawyer has suggested when you are applying for your religious mandate, commonly the fetal matter used to create the vaccines is used, but one of the reasonable beliefs of statement is this: Informed Consent, and cite the Eugenics Era. That due to the evil crimes of the 1920's and Eugenics Era, Hitlers Eugenics Program emerged and now we have advanced laws and the Nuremburg Code and Informed Consent. I have strong religious beliefs against the Eugenics Era and what Hitler did. All who embrace eugenics and forcing medical should be in prison for life for their crimes against humanity. Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 09/21/2021 02:09 PM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 75223235 United States 09/21/2021 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. WRONG. I am so sick of this lie. This ruling FORCED HIM TO PAY THE FINE, NOT TAKE THE INJECTION. He never took the injection, and never served jail time. It is not lawful to force someone to take a vaccine, but it is lawful to levy a fine in lieu. I will gladly pay whatever fine is issued. The court still ruled in favor of the government and against personal freedom, that's what's important here. And what happens if the fine is 10k and you can't pay it. Don't pay traffic fines and see what happens Moran. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80648416 United States 09/21/2021 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | or either people pay the fine like the guy did 100 years ago and you'll not be vaccinated Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80449342 5 bucks back then is 155.44 today One could argue in court the definition of a vaccine and easily dismiss the notion any options deemed acceptable do not meet pre2020 definition of vaccine. You cant argue that your employer cant require it though. We have rights between government and ourselves not government and business, and that's where workers lose any right to a job. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80852677 United States 09/21/2021 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. That is not what they said.. It says that a State, (not the Federal Government), may do so. The Federal Government is limited by the 10th Amendment. The State is limited by it's legislature and it's people. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 68236614 Canada 09/21/2021 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those 2 decisions that formed the Eugenics era have been overturned shortly after WW2. Nuremburg Code is the law, and international law at that. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27624035 United States 09/21/2021 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. WRONG. I am so sick of this lie. This ruling FORCED HIM TO PAY THE FINE, NOT TAKE THE INJECTION. He never took the injection, and never served jail time. It is not lawful to force someone to take a vaccine, but it is lawful to levy a fine in lieu. I will gladly pay whatever fine is issued. The court still ruled in favor of the government and against personal freedom, that's what's important here. And what happens if the fine is 10k and you can't pay it. Don't pay traffic fines and see what happens Moran. It's not a vaccination, there's no coronovirus even in the "Vaccine". It's genetic manipulation, basically a worthless poison, much like you. |
fasthatch2000
User ID: 80149344 United States 09/21/2021 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79959165 United States 09/21/2021 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jacobson v. Massachusetts only applies to the STATES. Not the Federal Government. Quoting: Anubis72 That whole 10th Amendment thing, and even then the idea that because the Supreme court says a state can forcibly inject something into your body you disagree with is some how lawful or moral is ridiculous. The Supreme Court could rule tomorrow and give that right to the Federal Government and I would still refuse. It's also intentionally case specific which means for a new virus there has to be a new case. That was done to prevent abuse of authority, to bad nobody told modern politicians they're not supposed to abuse their authority. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80824897 Canada 09/21/2021 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78562265 United States 09/21/2021 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 68236614 Canada 09/21/2021 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THERE IS NO BREAKING NEWS. Eugenics and Jacobsen and Buck vs. Bell, WAS OVERTURNED AFTER THE WAR AND THE NUREMBURG CODE IS THE LAW. Barnes also brought up that this seems to be what the dems and gates and fauci want back: the old eugenics era, not happening under any circumstances. And Biden can't compel anyone. Law is Nuremburg Code and they tried to force experimental vaccines on military for ebola, years ago, and THE GOVERNMENT LOST IN COURT. But the ones that blindly obeyed, there were lots of vaxx injured and deaths. But they lost. Nuremburg Code laws even apply to soldiers. Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 09/21/2021 02:14 PM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78093641 United States 09/21/2021 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How many times has SCOTUS ruled one way only to have to correct themselves years later? Below is a list of overruled SCOTUS decisions. Lets hope they add a new one soon. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
themessengernevermatters
User ID: 80117407 United States 09/21/2021 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back in 1905, the supreme court ruled in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that Quoting: Cernunnos 75223235 It is within the police power of a State to enact a compulsory vaccination law, and it is for the legislature, and not for the courts, to determine Page 197 U. S. 12 in the first instance whether vaccination is or is not the best mode for the prevention of smallpox and the protection of the public health. [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] This has never been a free country, people just assume it was because of rose colored glasses. Before this was reconstruction, before that was the civil war, before that, well you get the point. As of right now, the emporer Xiden can force you to take the vaccine at gun point unless congress passes a new law overriding the supreme court, or the supreme court reexamines the previous ruling. There is only one way to preserve liberty and freedom now, by watering a tree. WRONG. I am so sick of this lie. This ruling FORCED HIM TO PAY THE FINE, NOT TAKE THE INJECTION. He never took the injection, and never served jail time. It is not lawful to force someone to take a vaccine, but it is lawful to levy a fine in lieu. I will gladly pay whatever fine is issued. The court still ruled in favor of the government and against personal freedom, that's what's important here. And what happens if the fine is 10k and you can't pay it. Don't pay traffic fines and see what happens Moran. Of course they will, because the entire government and society has, become rotten with corruption, graft and greed. I don't know why anyone still thinks any part of it is still clean and going to save them. Frankly the supreme court fell to corruption long ago, when they gave fictitious entities the rights of the citizens allowing them to become shields of liability for the despots of the corporate neo aristocracy. Last Edited by themessengernevermatters on 09/21/2021 02:15 PM “The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they're lying, they know we know they're lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.” Elena Gorokhova, A Mountain of Crumbs |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80824897 Canada 09/21/2021 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77967640 United States 09/21/2021 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79959165 United States 09/21/2021 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Only a democrat would be dumb enough to think they won something by getting rid of the one guy in the country who said "the cure shouldn't be worse than the disease" and did everything he could to fight back against tyranny. You wanted a vaccine, you got it. Line up motherfucker. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80824897 Canada 09/21/2021 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80824897 Canada 09/21/2021 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |