All you have to do is check the Vaers system and you will see the truth | |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Doesn't say if this birth was pre-term, but it doesn't sound normal. Also doesn't report the condition of the baby or mother afterward: patient received vaccine roughly 1030am 01sep. at 1500 on 01sep patient reported chills, shaking, headache 6/10. vitals 36.7c oral, 115bpm, 99% spo2, 26rr, 137/62 bp. given tylenol for pain and prophylactic fever reduction. at 1625 patient reported having contractions lasting roughly 40 seconds at 6/10 intensity every 3.5-4min. 500ml bolus given, iv placed, fetal monitoring found fetal hr to be 190-200s. patient moved to l&d triage for continuous monitoring. contractions continued and patient delivered via favd at roughly 0051 on 01sep [link to www.openvaers.com (secure)] |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Does this sound normal? onset of acute esotropia and diplopia the day following second moderna vaccination. also presented with symptoms of vertigo. patient currently has prism applied to glasses to relieve diplopia. cannot function without prism in glasses or monocular occlusion. [link to www.openvaers.com (secure)] |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here is an example of the MISC-c in a 17 year old male, onset of symptoms 27 days after the jab: 17y / male presents 8/29/2021 with 4 days of symptoms: fever, tachycardia, vomiting, congestion, and red eyes diagnosed with mis-c [link to www.openvaers.com (secure)] |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Reports are coming in from around the U.S. that fully vaccinated people are not only becoming infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and developing symptoms of COVID-19 but are also, increasingly, being hospitalized with severe symptoms and dying. This development is creating a dilemma for those who argue that, although the COVID vaccines may not prevent coronavirus infection and transmission, at least they protect people from something worse. This may be why there is such a sudden rush to push a booster shot. [link to thevaccinereaction.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31591937 United States 09/10/2021 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 08:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Be careful if you actually try to get a flu shot (I personally don't get them, but I know a number of people do): the patient came in to get the flu shot. the pharmacist administering the vaccine misunderstood which vaccine the patient wanted and administered the janssen covid vaccine instead. [link to www.openvaers.com (secure)] |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 14 yo female patient brought to the ed by her mom for sudden 9/10 sharp, non-radiating chest pain and palpitations. the pain started 8/30 around 6pm, with no identifiable trigger. symptoms continued despite taking tylenol pills. she had 4 episodes of non-bloody non-bilious vomiting and headache. mother called an ambulance and was taken to the ed around 9pm. symptoms resolved by 01:00am. ed course: in the ed, patient afebrile with marked tachycardia heart rate in 130s to 140s, initial suspicion for pulmonary embolism, emergent ct scan ruled out [link to www.openvaers.com (secure)] No identifiable trigger, except that she had received a clot shot 2 days before... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79265007 Canada 09/10/2021 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80857050 Germany 09/10/2021 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80857050 Germany 09/10/2021 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The VAERS system is an unverified reporting system that does not determine if a vaccine caused the events that are reported. VAERS does not determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse events, which can often happen coincidentally after immunization. VAERS has often been misrepresented by anti-vaccine advocates, and the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine has brought more attention to the surveillance system. Since anyone can submit a report to the system, it is impossible to know if the symptoms were caused by the vaccine. “There are spikes of reporting on various things and some people unfortunately use VAERS inappropriately,” Campbell said. “Any symptoms can be reported by VAERS by anyone.” [link to apnews.com (secure)] |
Grey Eagle
User ID: 73671193 United States 09/10/2021 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Reports are coming in from around the U.S. that fully vaccinated people are not only becoming infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and developing symptoms of COVID-19 but are also, increasingly, being hospitalized with severe symptoms and dying. This development is creating a dilemma for those who argue that, although the COVID vaccines may not prevent coronavirus infection and transmission, at least they protect people from something worse. This may be why there is such a sudden rush to push a booster shot. Quoting: Daniel Higdon [link to thevaccinereaction.org (secure)] for more awareness and knowledge. :fireplace: "Remember when we used to treat colds and flu with chicken soup, saltwater gargles and warm tea instead of Communism?" |
Grey Eagle
User ID: 73671193 United States 09/10/2021 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is just the tip of the iceberg Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79265007 SO MUCH is not being reported, anywhere. Silent genocide And they continue to lie and deny it daily... :fireplace: "Remember when we used to treat colds and flu with chicken soup, saltwater gargles and warm tea instead of Communism?" |
blackdiamond
User ID: 80474317 United States 09/10/2021 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78042016 09/10/2021 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] The VAERS system is an unverified reporting system that does not determine if a vaccine caused the events that are reported. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS does not determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse events, which can often happen coincidentally after immunization. VAERS has often been misrepresented by anti-vaccine advocates, and the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine has brought more attention to the surveillance system. Since anyone can submit a report to the system, it is impossible to know if the symptoms were caused by the vaccine. “There are spikes of reporting on various things and some people unfortunately use VAERS inappropriately,” Campbell said. “Any symptoms can be reported by VAERS by anyone.” [link to apnews.com (secure)] Doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen. Prove those are fake submissions. |
Republic of Texas
User ID: 80479895 United States 09/10/2021 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] VAERS was the gold standard until the clotshot came around. “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31591937 United States 09/10/2021 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] It does not prove cause and effect, but is an indicator. For 30 years, deaths per month ranged from single digits to about 25. I didn't average all the months but would estimate 15 per month for 30 years, since the inception of VAERS. In January of this year it jumped to 488, peaked in April 1344 and in August was 349. Check for yourself. That is a smoking gun, the jabb is not safe. |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hearing that it is mostly the "vaccinated" that are in the hospital near me. It is 95 % are "vaccinated" IN the hospital. Quoting: blackdiamond I've been reading over some of the reports in Vaers for the last month or two. Definitely many more reports now of double vaxxed people being admitted to the hospital. |
TXP
User ID: 80383054 United States 09/10/2021 09:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Per the VAERS data, most post-injection deaths occur within the first three days of injection and then a hockey stick spike in the third and fourth weeks when the inflammation caused by the spike proteins finally overload one's immune system. Potential ADE comes later when seasonal cold-flu-pneumonia season kicks into gear. As compiled by GLPER CNews113p: JASSEN:( Using 07232021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 283:0 62:1 28:2 26:3 17:4 12:5 16:6 17:7 7:8 17:9 45:10 to 14 73:15 to 30 36:31 to 60 13:61 to 120 2:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot MODERNA: ( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 428:0 542:1 246:2 144:3 105:4 106:5 62:6 103:7 54:8 61:9 246:10 to 14 516:15 to 30 337:31 to 60 158:61 to 120 38:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot PFIZER:( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 2,837:0 1,902:1 650:2 448:3 329:4 301:5 209:6 213:7 170:8 139:9 583:10 to 14 877:15 to 30 512:31 to 60 342:61 to 120 117:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot UNKNOWN:( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 40:0 12:1 12:2 30:3 5:4 8:5 0:6 1:7 5:8 4:9 10:10 to 14 16:15 to 30 11:31 to 60 9:61 to 120 18:121+ Thread: The Die off rate from USA CoVid "Vaccines" in Days after being "Shot" using 07-30-2021 VAERS Data . . "Stop the lockdown. Stop the masks. Stick your vaccine up your ass." - Tess....AMEN! "What does CENSORSHIP reveal? It reveals FEAR." - Julian Assange . |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] Did you get the shots? If so, I can understand why you don't want to believe the reports in Vaers. I would be afraid as well. I'm afraid for some of my loved ones that got the shot. All I can say is that you should spend some time reading the reports if you can handle it. Some yes might be questionable. Many of them are entered by medical professionals. A number in this latest dump were entered by pharmacists. Perhaps these were cases where the shots were administered by a pharmacist? Last Edited by Daniel Higdon on 09/10/2021 09:12 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78962880 United States 09/10/2021 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Daniel, I'll add a little VAERS data I just shared in a diff thread. Cheers! Quoting: TXP Per the VAERS data, most post-injection deaths occur within the first three days of injection and then a hockey stick spike in the third and fourth weeks when the inflammation caused by the spike proteins finally overload one's immune system. Potential ADE comes later when seasonal cold-flu-pneumonia season kicks into gear. As compiled by GLPER CNews113p: JASSEN:( Using 07232021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 283:0 62:1 28:2 26:3 17:4 12:5 16:6 17:7 7:8 17:9 45:10 to 14 73:15 to 30 36:31 to 60 13:61 to 120 2:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot MODERNA: ( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 428:0 542:1 246:2 144:3 105:4 106:5 62:6 103:7 54:8 61:9 246:10 to 14 516:15 to 30 337:31 to 60 158:61 to 120 38:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot PFIZER:( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 2,837:0 1,902:1 650:2 448:3 329:4 301:5 209:6 213:7 170:8 139:9 583:10 to 14 877:15 to 30 512:31 to 60 342:61 to 120 117:121+ ============ 07232021 Kill Rate over Days for Each CoVid Shot UNKNOWN:( Using 07302021 Data ) Deaths: Days to Death after Onset (Vaccine) 40:0 12:1 12:2 30:3 5:4 8:5 0:6 1:7 5:8 4:9 10:10 to 14 16:15 to 30 11:31 to 60 9:61 to 120 18:121+ Thread: The Die off rate from USA CoVid "Vaccines" in Days after being "Shot" using 07-30-2021 VAERS Data . Thank you TXP. Interesting but scary. I wonder how many shots have been given of each variety as there appear to be a significantly higher number of deaths from the Pfizer shots. |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] It does not prove cause and effect, but is an indicator. For 30 years, deaths per month ranged from single digits to about 25. I didn't average all the months but would estimate 15 per month for 30 years, since the inception of VAERS. In January of this year it jumped to 488, peaked in April 1344 and in August was 349. Check for yourself. That is a smoking gun, the jabb is not safe. |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is just the tip of the iceberg Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79265007 SO MUCH is not being reported, anywhere. Silent genocide And they continue to lie and deny it daily... Yes they do. I noticed an uptick in the number of Immunization failure reports. I suspect that the doctors and nurses are getting fed up. However, I also noticed some of those reports that included information such as patient got it from unvaccinated neighbor, patient was at a family gathering with unvaccinated people, etc. So some of the medical professionals are using this as another way to blame the unvaccinated. Last Edited by Daniel Higdon on 09/10/2021 09:18 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79089724 United States 09/10/2021 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] Did you get the shots? If so, I can understand why you don't want to believe the reports in Vaers. I would be afraid as well. I'm afraid for some of my loved ones that got the shot. All I can say is that you should spend some time reading the reports if you can handle it. Some yes might be questionable. Many of them are entered by medical professionals. A number in this latest dump were entered by pharmacists. Perhaps these were cases where the shots were administered by a pharmacist? But VAERS itself says right on their site that the results can be submitted by anyone, the results are not verified and does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. Nobody is scared. That is just what VAERS is about. "All I can say is that you should spend some time reading the reports if you can handle it. " Sure, let's see some of those verifiable reports, but relying on VAERS doesn't hack it. |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] VAERS was the gold standard until the clotshot came around. Now we are told by the talking heads not to pay attention to Vaers. Incredible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79089724 United States 09/10/2021 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The VAERS system is an unverified reporting system that does not determine if a vaccine caused the events that are reported. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS does not determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse events, which can often happen coincidentally after immunization. VAERS has often been misrepresented by anti-vaccine advocates, and the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine has brought more attention to the surveillance system. Since anyone can submit a report to the system, it is impossible to know if the symptoms were caused by the vaccine. “There are spikes of reporting on various things and some people unfortunately use VAERS inappropriately,” Campbell said. “Any symptoms can be reported by VAERS by anyone.” [link to apnews.com (secure)] Yet VAERS "evidence" is shilled time after time here, every day. Lame |
Daniel Higdon
(OP) User ID: 69657566 United States 09/10/2021 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | VAERS is meaningless. Anybody can enter anything they want and none of it is verified. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80857050 VAERS reports can be submitted voluntarily by anyone, including healthcare providers, patients, or family members. Reports vary in quality and completeness. They often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors. A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine. [link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)] Did you get the shots? If so, I can understand why you don't want to believe the reports in Vaers. I would be afraid as well. I'm afraid for some of my loved ones that got the shot. All I can say is that you should spend some time reading the reports if you can handle it. Some yes might be questionable. Many of them are entered by medical professionals. A number in this latest dump were entered by pharmacists. Perhaps these were cases where the shots were administered by a pharmacist? But VAERS itself says right on their site that the results can be submitted by anyone, the results are not verified and does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. Nobody is scared. That is just what VAERS is about. "All I can say is that you should spend some time reading the reports if you can handle it. " Sure, let's see some of those verifiable reports, but relying on VAERS doesn't hack it. Then what do you rely on? Did you receive informed consent? Are you positive that you know all of the potential risks associated with the treatment? Honest question, why are you even on this thread if you believe Vaers is worthless? Does it make you nervous that we are discussing the Vaers reports? Defensive? Are you just curious or what? |