Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..

covid sluts still going to covid slut..


they love the action, the fake covid pandemic and the clampdown of the NWO on nation states, made them slut some more.

it was exciting they got tired of watching everybody loves raymond and will and grace..

they got some stuff to tell their normie friends

i survived a global pandemic

i survived lockdowns

i got injected with fetal parts and monkey stool cells to save grandma and little children

for all a bunch of bullshit with a 99.8% survival rate..

but don't tell them that,, they are heroes for the greater good

where did we hear that 'greater good' line before?

remind me

Last Edited by Grove Street on 08/25/2021 10:46 PM

And a vaccine so effective and safe that you have to get vaccinated in order for everyone else's vaccine to work.

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

and tested with a kit so reliable that it gives positive results with soft drinks or anything else you swab it with..

You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.

If not for MSM you'd never know it even existed. That's why the Amish are not effected, the don't have tell-a-vision.

LOLZ fucking ey the TRUTH IS WILD!

a disease so serious that when you get it,

they tell you to go home and take two ibuprofen and call me when you are about to die so we can collect from the government

The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 12:01 AM

I have been looking for images, like we see of bacteria, of Virus\Viruses\Virus'\Virii but cannot find any.

One was said to be a 'virus' or maybe even 'Covid 19' itself viewed through a microscope but that was disputed.

If anyone has images of a virus from any source please post a link.

Or to put the second part another way, imagine being so stupid the govt has to force you to get vaccinated.

A virus so real it's never been isolated.

Thank God we have each other here so we can laugh at the absurdity of it all.

Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]

A virus so deadly they have to put you in a medically induced coma with fentenyl and then intubate you in order to kill you.

Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?

It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.

Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that the same fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?

*just edited in the bolded

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 03:13 AM

It's been a long since I listened to him and I'd have to go back and hear it again. I think with DNA, a sample can be so small - complete but a very small amount - that that's where amplification becomes useful. IIRC, he also said that we all have fragments of stuff floating around in our bloodstream that is completely harmless (maybe normal process of elimination?) that these liars claim are pathogens, hence fraudulent diagnoses, as with HIV.

My understanding is that by fragment is meaning a piece of the whole, not that it is a small quantity. A fragment of dna is not the whole genome, which would be needed to identify, say sars-cov2 from sars-cov1. A fragment of dna from either would not be able to identify either definitely because odds are good they would both contain the same fragment in their genome.

The reason to amplify fragments, from my understanding, was for research. They would have been utilizing known fragments of dna that were identifiable in the aids genome, however there was not enough of the dna to perform research. Hence the pcr, to amplify in quantity the small amount of fragments of aids dna into many more fragments of aids dna.

That is how I understood it.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 03:12 AM

You could be right. I don't know why he developed the technology. Research for sure, since he was a researcher, but what prompted it and what if a particular kind of research, I don't know. Possibly, as you said, fragments and possibly samples whole but too small in quantity, as happens in stuff like forensics or anthropology. I'd be curious to know more about it.

One thing I DO know is that no SARS CoV2 or SARS or MERS even exists. None have ever been isolated, purified or replicated. Andrew Kaufman said what they were claiming was SARS CoV2 were really exosomes, which are normal things expelled by cells as in taking out the trash. That reminded me of Kery Mullis talking about bits of stuff, inside everyone, that are normal and harmless.

I'd also like to know more about Kery's death because the timing with the scamdemic seems awfully convenient for the psychopaths behind all this.

and imagine so many humans so stupid at least 50% that believed the lies and enabled the NWO to carry out their plans

that above is the scariest part

i don't even blame the elite anymore much..

i blame the idiots who fell for their bullshit..

it's sad..

they brought us all down so low because of their stupidity..

and they were in the way of us removing the elite.

and we've been telling them for decades..but they didn't care..they had professional sports, TV, all kinds of bullshit distractions and always marginalized the truth because they had their fingers in their ears going LA LA LA..

and now look at where we are at

happy now ???

you made this more difficult than it needed to be

thanks a fucking lot for nothing

but don't be confused..just stay out of the godammned way next time OKAY

go back to your life but stay the fuck out of the way this time

Last Edited by Grove Street on 08/26/2021 03:46 AM

The minions are just as guilty as their father below and I blame them, too. They chose their path and have no one to blame but themselves. Truth isn't something that ever interested them; only their own desires, driven by greed, fear, ego, envy, desire to control and just plain malice. Fuck every last one of them.

Yes, I have seen that information as well, it is a very interesting topic, one that merits more research. Unfortunately, taking the exosome theory to a normie has the potential for them from completely dismissing any information you may bring with them. It may get you a 'nutter' designation with them, whether it is warranted or not.

Which is why I think the PCR and Mullis is such a strong bit of information. This information is still out there and can be presented that it would be very hard to deny. It also answers the question, HOW this scamdemic might be pulled off, which may encourage them to consider additional information.

Which really should be our goal, when given the opportunity to share information that may make them question their perceived TV based reality, it needs to be air-tight and a home run. I think Mullis and PCR are as close to that as we have at this point.