FDA Appears To Be Purposefully Tricking People - Approval Is ONLY for Pfizer's New Comirnaty Vax and NOT AVAILABLE Due To No Liability Shield | |
EndTheFed
User ID: 78161281 United States 08/25/2021 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Elloelle
User ID: 14904217 United States 08/25/2021 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Questioning369
User ID: 73501702 United States 08/25/2021 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: FDA Appears To Be Purposefully Tricking People - Approval Is ONLY for Pfizer's New Comirnaty Vax and NOT AVAILABLE Due To No Liability Shield When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from a generous retinue of liability protections. Quoting: But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages. And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical. Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product. So this is saying the only way approved vax is actually shield from liability is if it is placed on the mandatory schedule, which is currently is not. Also they currently would not have a stock of the approved vax, just the eua vax, which are the same things but the approval only applies to that which has been produced after the approval process? What they are doing is a bait and switch. My question then is, what about current vaccines such as a flu vaccine, are the companies that produce them liable for adverse reactions? These are obviously not on a mandatory schedule, does anyone have any information regarding this? If this is the actual case, it would seem to back up the claim. I always thought all vaccines were protected. Questioning369 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54483479 Australia 08/29/2021 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |