Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It | |
vEyeSea
User ID: 30003138 United States 08/25/2021 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It My notes from the videos: Quoting: vEyeSea EUA provides immunity. FDA approval does not. The FDA re-branded the Pfizer vax, from BioNTech (Pfizer's partner that manufactures their vaccine). Re-brand has full FDA approval but is not manufactured, does not exist and can't be taken. They do this to pretend that the Pfizer shot is approved, but it isn't and therefore Pfizer has complete immunity from lawsuits. then why do they say its the exact thing except a different name? [link to www.fiercepharma.com (secure)] They are legally different. It's just a criminal work around. They can say it's FDA approve when it's not and Pfizer has no liability for damages (which they know will occur.) What's really wrong, is if it's never been manufactured then how could it pass testing and be fda approved? Were there trials (phase 2 or 3)? Last Edited by vEyeSea on 08/25/2021 09:52 AM To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. When the government is wrong, it's dangerous to be right. The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. -Robspierre |
Augmentalist
User ID: 80790137 United States 08/25/2021 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
tkwasny
User ID: 71641081 United States 08/25/2021 10:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It There seems to be a disconnection in terminology of what the space-time continuum is. A "long-term study period" means YEARS NEEDS TO PASS, then it will qualify, by definition, as a long term study period. Six months or a year is not equal to four or five years, when time itself is the foundational factor. |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/25/2021 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It FDA should be constantly dragged to court for foia cases, because they should not have any authority when paid for by big pharma. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Nemesis8
The Greatest Light User ID: 73697154 United States 08/25/2021 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Busterhymen
User ID: 47834401 United States 08/25/2021 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It So, as a delaying tactic if your job requires the vax, could you say I want the Comirnarty shot because the other is still experimental? Obviously it will be several more months till that's out. FCK the WEF! Keep your hands off my country! |
dawning light
User ID: 80335991 United States 08/25/2021 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It So, as a delaying tactic if your job requires the vax, could you say I want the Comirnarty shot because the other is still experimental? Obviously it will be several more months till that's out. Quoting: Busterhymen And I wonder if there are lawyers that will fight this mandate for the people. I think there are. And though this world, with devils filled, should threaten to undo us, We will not fear, for God hath willed His truth to triumph through us; The Prince of Darkness grim, we tremble not for him; His rage we can endure, for lo, his doom is sure, One little word shall fell him |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/25/2021 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It So, as a delaying tactic if your job requires the vax, could you say I want the Comirnarty shot because the other is still experimental? Obviously it will be several more months till that's out. Quoting: Busterhymen Yes, Barnes does bring that point up. The FDA approved product does not exist. He said, if your employer or institute wants you to march down and take the fda approved product, you say, well I couldn't its not out yet. The only ones out are experimental. By the way most of the lawsuit issues still existed even for a potential FDA approved mandate and were still on. Host of issues involved including broad exemptions, disability act, discrimination, dangers, no other appropriate measures can be taken, such as staying home when sick. Etc etc. Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 08/25/2021 10:28 AM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Paul Drake
User ID: 77420325 United States 08/25/2021 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/25/2021 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It My notes from the videos: Quoting: vEyeSea EUA provides immunity. FDA approval does not. The FDA re-branded the Pfizer vax, from BioNTech (Pfizer's partner that manufactures their vaccine). Re-brand has full FDA approval but is not manufactured, does not exist and can't be taken. They do this to pretend that the Pfizer shot is approved, but it isn't and therefore Pfizer has complete immunity from lawsuits. then why do they say its the exact thing except a different name? [link to www.fiercepharma.com (secure)] They are legally different. It's just a criminal work around. They can say it's FDA approve when it's not and Pfizer has no liability for damages (which they know will occur.) What's really wrong, is if it's never been manufactured then how could it pass testing and be fda approved? Were there trials (phase 2 or 3)? It's not even a legal workaround, because you can't use an emergency use product when a fda licensed product is available, but its not available yet so this a real RUSE its a complete trick on the public. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
StarF
User ID: 77939003 United States 08/25/2021 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It Great thread, 5*. I kept seeing "Comirnarty" is the "approval" docs as well and was scratching my head. I thought maybe they were trying to build a brand for mRNA. Didn't occur to me that this was part of a bait-and-switch. Star |
GDay_M8
User ID: 73670619 United States 08/25/2021 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It WARNING - The current Pfizer vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine, has NOT been FDA approved and it will remain Emerergency Authorize Use (EAU). The NEW Pfizer vaccine that IS approved by the FDA is called Pfizer Comirnaty Vaccine and it is NOT available yet. Don't be fooled by what mainstream media or others are assuming. Read this article that explains why and how everyone is being tricked! IMPORTANT - Read this article on Twitter or use the Alternative Link below and share with everyone before they ban it! An employer can only mandate a FDA approved vaccine, not EAU. There is no FDA approved vaccine available right now, only the current EAU! The new FDA approved Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine does NOT have a government Liability Shield. Only the current EAU version has a Liability Shield and the FDA approved one does not get it. This is why they were forced to use a different name. Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product. Read more about this in the article! https://twitter.com/_/status/1430525824176902150 ALTERNATIVE LINK - Just in case they take that article off of Twitter, here is a link directly to the article. [link to childrenshealthdefense.org (secure)] Share With Everyone Before It's To Late! Last Edited by SilenceNoOne on 08/25/2021 01:34 PM _________________________________ "The bigger the lie which is pushed and repeated from the enemy, the more people will refuse to accept any evidence of the truth!" - SilenceNoOne |
XJDUB
User ID: 75452801 Canada 08/25/2021 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sidus
User ID: 40897032 United States 08/25/2021 03:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It On the FDA website it says the current jab is approved for 16+ and still under EUA to cover 12-15 year olds. They approved the vax that they have been given and gave it a name. If I'm mistaken somehow please tell me how. "U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals." |
James-XF
User ID: 79502762 United States 08/25/2021 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It Good (but sometimes rambling) discussion with Dr. David Martin about this FDA 'decision' / 'non-decision' and how it really affects people's right to work. Bottom line is always, not 'what about my paycheck and my pension', it's about 'do I want to be part of an organization that thinks administering a biological weapon on its employees is a good thing'? 'bout time to hoist that ole black flag... |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/27/2021 02:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It Thread: "The Fight Has Just Begun" -Robert Barnes VivaFreiBarnes: Update even Athiesm is a Religious Exemption More information on here but it doesn't show up on any of the pages. mainly related to religious exemptions, can they ask for a clergy confirmation letters. No you write back and tell them they are not entitled to that, this is Religious Discrimination, they cannot cage you in a demonination or box or dictate to you in any way what your religious or spiritual beliefs are. Other issues involve some employers on this malicious power grab telling you if you don't vaxx, you are resigning trying to ensure you can't get unemployment insurance but that's illegal and its called: Constructive Firing. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/27/2021 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It Basically they're laying it on so thick, the abuse of rights, its going to crack on them. Sooner or later these companies could very well not have a pot to piss in anymore. When its determined this was crimes against humanity, then all courts costs, all fees, all losses including income, say 4 years later, will be owed you, under ADA the Disability laws. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/27/2021 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/27/2021 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It Another thread that won't show up in the 6 pages when posted on or bumped. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Major Doom
User ID: 80436317 United States 08/30/2021 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It The media are trying to push the false narrative that the BNT162b2 (V8) and Comirnaty formulations are identical, merely different labels. This is far from the truth. https://twitter.com/_/status/1430584420642218000 [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOOM is what you make of it. |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
(OP) User ID: 79835284 Canada 08/30/2021 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It The media are trying to push the false narrative that the BNT162b2 (V8) and Comirnaty formulations are identical, merely different labels. This is far from the truth. Quoting: Major Doom https://twitter.com/_/status/1430584420642218000 [link to twitter.com (secure)] They're 2 distinct legal entities and they couldn't put a restraining order on the process yet, or rather apply for it, more long shot really, but that option is not available right now. Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 08/30/2021 01:21 PM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Major Doom
User ID: 80436317 United States 08/30/2021 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Robert Barnes Took A Look At The Strange Wording In The Fda Approval and Dr. Robert Malone's Take On It As the formulations are different, of course they are legally distinct from one another. Whether or not Comirnaty is available in the US or not, if you get the BNT162b2 injection (which is practically guaranteed), Pfizer is not legally liable and it is the one currently under the EUA. This is how they are pulling the wool over peoples eyes and issuing mandates requiring the injection to work, buy, sell, etc; they believe they are getting the FDA approved shot but are still getting the EUA one. Last Edited by Major Doom on 08/30/2021 01:28 PM DOOM is what you make of it. |