GLP Peeps - Questions for you...

Should say stuck with myself...spell check is not my friend

This!

There would be no push and pull balance I.e everything would ocify

There is an innate program to label one perception as more valuable than another...yet it is the combined perceptions that lead to a bigger picture...of comprehension.

Yes - glad you wrote balance. That is important to the push and pull.

A harmony.

A dance.

Not a boxing match...lol

And anyone who takes ocification from only a non chaotic rational, is via tertium non detur, not looking at what kind of order results from utter chaos .i.e the PC movement in Maositic China.

I suppose a type of fluid dynamic ...equilibrium was a better choice for me to use

Fuck em

Did Mao step into "chaos" and try to "fix" it?

Because he knew what was best?

He was superior?

fuck mao this is AMERICA

On a side note I find it this thought, spontaneously thought , but possibly insightful.
Most people do not even understand the basic principle of disagreement should always be founded first in agreement of terms.
This is not imho how most peopel DISAGREE. They do not first foundationally look for common ground. Thus all disagreements remain ungracefully unenlightening .
Inversely, I would like to propose that most agreements are meaningless between most people I encounter , because they do not state where they disagree

Continues....
It's like most people imho, unfortunately do not understand the basic governing dynamic of what a conversation based in axioms actually is.

Continues...
Offered as extrapolation:
As per the political landscape , via chaos and ocification
I find the line represtation to be overly limited , extreme right and left always end with similar tyrannys. It leads to the same overal set of Tryanny via different direction of a circular, mirror imaged bellcurve

To take it one step further, it can be viewed as a Gaussian function, of a three dimensional , circular bell curve. Connected by field lines where one can employ systems on either side of center silmuteously to reach the extreme poles of Tyranny..

Agreed.

The rigidity of following the party decision rather than the moral one (or the corporate one) has become the ultimate challenge.

This system lacks the fluidity of a good communication...

And the pendulum swings...

Most excellent conversation..thank you.

Off to go do things and stuff...

Oh Man - This conversation was awesome and real...sorry you can't post AC.(s)

I've always been fascinated by communication.


To commune.

This morning while doing dishes I was wondering about telepathy.

We often catch thoughts that others are having...yet you only know this in real honest communication.

Most people try to hide what they are thinking and present masks to the world.

Sometimes we pick up on others thoughts, sometimes we push thoughts.

I find the only way to tell is to know you were thinking about something when someone else brings it up.

Differences add interest and fun to life.

Yes!

Lego'my ego...er or is that eggo...I forget.

LOl...no, too olde school...phones off and preferably in a bag. what's would be the point of communicating with a rabid texter/FBer etc?

You could include fencing as a dance. You can include wrestling as a dance. You can include most of the Asian martial arts as a dance...just saying.

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

True Dat

I try not to be wrong, and if I am, I pray I will be pointed out for it. As per your premise. A world of the same sucks. WHo wants a world of same-sames?