BOMBSHELL: HHS documents admit the CDC has never isolated any “covid-19 virus” … PCR tests nothing but instrument NOISE … th

BS. This technology has been around for a while and I’ve used it. Definitely not ideal for virus detection but not just “noise”. Natural news bogus by the way.

Here is some of the proof you are asking for:

[link to rumble.com (secure)]

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

I know they were adverting the "enhanced flu shot" back then.

Of course they never stated what enhancements where made.

Since people in nursing and care facilities nearly all get flu shots, I think that is how they started this who scam.

They now claim the flu has been eradicated from the planet, the single biggest medical break trough in medical history ever but magically, it is replaced by another 'virus' and the money just keeps flowing.

There must be a sars-cov-2 because Fauci was doing GOF (Gain of Function) research things on/with it etc.

That research was no hoax.

But, but, muh scientism, muh vaxxes, muh trust in the government...

sars-cov2 <> COVID19

Holy shit.

sars-cov2 <> COVID19

Right. So Fauci took sars-cov-2 and GOF'd it in Wuhan (paid funding) into Covid19. (Then it either got out or was released.)

Everyone can buy that I'm sure considering Fauci's history.

So Fauci and the Chinese isolated something and jacked it up with taxpayer money.

Now if you do that...

It's like this, let's say sars-cov-2 is a Toyota Forerunner and Fauci and the Chinese mount a machine to its roof... now, you think anyone in the world would be given a truck to thoroughly examine?

The killer trucks aren't hoaxes they're just not gonna show you.

There must be something to Covid19 in order to have the vaccines etc.

Even if it's only slightly different than sars-cov-1.

This, 'we can't isolate it so it don't exist' idea, Fauci and the Chinese isolated it, they're just not showing you their work.

Kinda

Much of what NN says is good, and they're gonna make mistakes by stepping out from the propaganda. And there are disinfo campaigns to discredit them.

The "Covid doesn't exist" thing is meant to discredit NN. I wish Mike wouldn't fall for it. But even while he does or isn't sure, it doesn't mean that many other things he does aren't good. There's a lot of good info there.

How do you now that whole story wasn't just a red herring thrown out to reinforce belief in the existence of the virus, like so many others? Others include bat soup, people dying in the street in china, spraying unknown chemicals everywhere (also in china), the fake PCR 'tests', and many other memory-holed events.

All theatre for the masses, nothing more. Question EVERYTHING

Where is there a full genomic sequencing that didn't involve using software to 'assume' fragments of the supposed virus? If there is one, how much WHO/Bill and Melinda Gates foundation/pharmaceutical company funding did they receive?

Also, why can THE CROWN not even provide evidence in court of COVID's existence when requested?

You bring up many good points.

Fauci's been doing research since he first got his hands on a test tube set, for decades etc.

He says they never funded GOF research in Wuhan China with U.S. taxpayer money.

That's what anyone would say if they were funding GOF research at a lab in Wuhan China.

For months they said Covid19 came from a bat cave/wet market in the country.

That's what anyone would say if Covid19 came from a lab.

So they've been saying both these things.

The court cases can't produce "the evidence" but that don't necessarily mean therefore, it doesn't exist. Or that Covid19 is a giant BS Hoax. This 'Hoax!' cry could be misleading theatre as well etc.

My basis for thinking Covid19 is real and there is something actually to it is Dr Peter McCullough who, in one of his video interviews fielded a hoax/just a bad flu question by contrasting Covid19 effects with the flu, they are different and present differently.

Dr. McCullough has claimed to have had both covid and the flu and he's also a very respected doctor who seems knowledgeable and gives also advice on treating covid without vaccines.

So from a prominent respected doctor who claims to have had covid and got over it and can detail the differences between it and the flu which he also claims to have had, I'm going to tentatively think it's not actually a hoax and there may be something to it.

The link in the OP has A link to the CDC.
[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]
On page 40 (bottom of page) of the CDC document (page 41 in my pdf reader),second paragraph says: (read the second sentence)

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with
characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of
known titer (RNA copies/&#956;L) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and
viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1
Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral
RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific
TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-
Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions
for use.

Did you see the second sentence in the second paragraph under Performance characteristics - Analytical performance: Limit of Detection (LoD)? Why would the CDC not have virus isolates if they exist? Date at bottom of the pages say effective: 7/21/2021

On page 38 (39 in my pdf reader) under Limitations heading, the last bulleted point says

This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.

Imagine a vaccine so safe that the government has to coerce you to take it... for a virus so deadly that you have to be tested to find out if you have it.

Just a reminder...
A genuine pandemic doesn't require 24/7 advertising to remind you that it exists.
Real pandemics don't need marketing campaigns and endless propaganda..but, psychological operations DO

22m16s
[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

COVID NOT ISOLATED, CANNOT BE LOCATED, DOES NOT EXIST! FOIA RESPONSE REVEALS WORLDWIDE HOAX!
First published at 23:21 UTC on August 6th, 2021.
#COVID-LIE #STEW-PETERS #PLANDEMIC
Americafalling

[link to www.brighteon.com (secure)]

Tracker

Bump

I find it funny you can’t post this on Facebook , that’s how you know it’s true . I’m in middle of a debate about COVID with my brother on Facebook and he claims COVID has been isolated which it has not. And I’ve called him out for being not only ignorant but failing to question the narrative as if we accept it without question we’re not using our brain fully. So many things don’t add up that if you blindly accept what’s told your either an idiot , brainwashed or both .

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

Well to be fair they had it isolated, then it escaped.

Lol

Bump