Trust the “CoV Science,” right?!? So, what precisely is that science, and who are the scientists?

So, I got into an argument with a friend of mine the other day.

My friend has swallowed the mainstream narrative, gotten the jabs (with no ill effect thank goodness; however, I suspect that he is one of the many unwitting “control group” subjects), and his entire argument over why he took the jab is that the “science was all but settled” over this vaccine’s efficacy because of the “thousands of doctors and scientists” stating same.

In effect, a herd mentality that so many seem to have these days, even when they can also acknowledge that much of the media and info they see on other subject matter coming from the same so-called purveyors of “fact and truth” is bullshit. Amazing what (manufactured) fear will do to one’s critical thinking skills, but here we are.

Anyway, as a result I thought I might start collecting info on the growing list of credentialed scientists that refute the current narrative so I could be better armed to cite them and their positions when we get into that next argument. To be fair, however, I also want to know which similarly credentialed scientists are behind the current narrative, so thought I would start a thread.

I know that there are at least a handful of folks here like my friend, so ask that you contribute if you can - understanding, of course, that any personal attacks to discredit any scientist cited (without merit) on either side are immediate suspect propaganda that will be ignored.

In short, I’m hoping to aggregate a list of scientists and/or true experts on both sides of this argument, hopefully with a link or two pointing to who precisely they are (and why they are truly qualified to hold a substantive opinion) and hopefully a quick summary of the arguments they make to support their position.

Personally discrediting Hit pieces made by disingenuous authors without real credentials beyond being a so-called “science editor” or some such will be deleted/ignored; however, if someone has verifiable info or evidence that might help illuminate potential bias, please share. That is equally important to this effort.