me777
Offer Upgrade
User ID: 80289431
 Canada
07/30/2021 05:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years Covid-19: Should we be worried about reports of myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA vaccines?Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years In this News Analysis, Jacqui Wise [1]⁠ writes about the reports of myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA vaccines administered in those aged 25 and below. These reports are based on pharmacovigilance systems with known serious limitations [2]⁠, where an estimated 9 in 10 serious adverse drug reactions remain unreported, leading to gross underestimation of true harm incidence⁠. One can look instead directly into Pfizer’s own studies on younger individuals to see how serious harms in the vaccinated groups are significantly higher than those in the unvaccinated groups. I give below a brief analysis. [ link to www.bmj.com (secure)] |
Kriegswichtiger Arbeiter
User ID: 80677593
 Hungary
07/30/2021 06:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years |
Limpan
User ID: 76068685
 Sweden
07/30/2021 06:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years I trust nothing anymore |
jontae
User ID: 80499490
Canada
07/30/2021 07:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years
If the numbers from the study referenced in this BMJ article hold out, even just among Pfizer recipients, we're going to see an epedemic of heart disease and blood clotting as a result that will surpass anything in human history and anything anyone could ever have imagined. Further, they did test these experimental vaccines on kids and not only that but they did with government approval which is how every government reached the conclusion twelve was the starting age for vaccination. What's worse, they knew about the heart related risks and new roughly one percent could develop vaccine related heart disease and not only approved the vaccines but approved them for kids. How many times during all of this have we heard that such claims were conspiracy theory? Of course, it's unlikely these side effects are limited to Pfizer so we can expect a truly astronomical amount of heart disease and also stroke due to clotting in the coming years. |
virgie68
User ID: 79635144
 United States
07/30/2021 07:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years Wouldn't it also suggest they knew the risk was higher for young people and epsecially kids who were unlikely to get the virus anyway but they turned around and approved it for them regardless? Why the fuck would they approve it for kids knowing the risk was higher?! |
me777
(OP)
User ID: 80289431
Canada
07/30/2021 11:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years Quoting: Kriegswichtiger Arbeiter  |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80347883
 United Kingdom
07/31/2021 08:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58252656
United States
07/31/2021 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years *points toward*
Not even clicking the link |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58252656
United States
07/31/2021 08:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Pfizer's own data point towards an excess of mRNA vaccine harms for those aged 12-25 years *points toward*
Not even clicking the link
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58252656 Seriously, who wrote that article? It is full of grammatical errors. |
