The "moon rover" thingy is a dead giveaway the moon landing was faked | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80325381 Canada 07/05/2021 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598
User ID: 80141479 United States 07/05/2021 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The takeoff camera even pans upward to follow the ascent vehicle. Quoting: Justme C'est Moi I guess they left one astronaut on the Moon to handle the camera work. :) And that flying spam can performed a perfectly controlled ascent and didn't tumble around like it should have. Did they have high speed vectored thrust engines back then? remote controlled camera? Back then a remote controlled camera, controlled by what? radar? Would have been rather amazing tech for the day. TV remotes that in any way resemble modern remotes didn't happen until the mid 70's. I remember seeing one. You pressed the button and I think it emitted a whistle or some nonsense. And cameras were big and heavy back then. and something kept the camera pointed at the target. Another astronaut joystick? Hey, we are spiralling out of control, a little help? No can do Buzz, I am manning the camera pan and tilt joystick. Then that abandoned camera has to transmit the images to Earth. In the 1960's. Most cameras back then used film. Needed to be developed. This had to be a modern camera that captures images electronically and transmits without visiting a dark room first. Big hulking cameras! [link to i.pinimg.com (secure)] Could not be controlled by an astronaut. The Baud rate on that camera transmitter would have taken a minute or so just to transmit 1 frame of image. Maybe the camera was on a wind up clock spring that would perform the anticipated tracking movements, initiated by an astronaut pulling a long string right at launch? LOL Last Edited by JustmeTX on 07/05/2021 11:41 AM Justme |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The takeoff camera even pans upward to follow the ascent vehicle. Quoting: Justme C'est Moi I guess they left one astronaut on the Moon to handle the camera work. :) And that flying spam can performed a perfectly controlled ascent and didn't tumble around like it should have. Did they have high speed vectored thrust engines back then? Space-X made history when successfully landing a rocket in 2016. Because landing a rocket is actually a bit of an engineering challenge. Kind of amazing NASA could do it back in 1969. On the moon. Untested. Over and over. No failures. And it took SpaceX several failed attempts to get it to work. Where is the test footage of the dry runs of LEM landing and Ascent module takeoff? Worked first time I guess. Since we have full Earth gravity, I guess they had to test it on the Mooon itself. And it worked first time, every time. Justme |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The takeoff camera even pans upward to follow the ascent vehicle. Quoting: Justme C'est Moi I guess they left one astronaut on the Moon to handle the camera work. :) And that flying spam can performed a perfectly controlled ascent and didn't tumble around like it should have. Did they have high speed vectored thrust engines back then? Space-X made history when successfully landing a rocket in 2016. Because landing a rocket is actually a bit of an engineering challenge. Kind of amazing NASA could do it back in 1969. On the moon. Untested. Over and over. No failures. And it took SpaceX several failed attempts to get it to work. Where is the test footage of the dry runs of LEM landing and Ascent module takeoff? Worked first time I guess. Since we have full Earth gravity, I guess they had to test it on the Mooon itself. And it worked first time, every time. And SpaceX is not a flying tuna can. It is fairly long and also has the advantage of using air drag on guidance fins. Last Edited by JustmeTX on 07/05/2021 11:19 AM Justme |
JellyTelly1
User ID: 79658944 Czechia 07/05/2021 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Boss351Mustang
User ID: 78050848 Canada 07/05/2021 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dogfood™
User ID: 80468255 United States 07/05/2021 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80561239 Poland 07/05/2021 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Quoting: Dogfood™ Oh, so they have children's book drawings to prove it. OK, I guess you win then. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42289153 United States 07/05/2021 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78230975 United States 07/05/2021 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76400490 Germany 07/05/2021 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79656743 United States 07/05/2021 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77302271 United States 07/05/2021 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77302271 United States 07/05/2021 02:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598
User ID: 80141479 United States 07/05/2021 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The takeoff camera even pans upward to follow the ascent vehicle. Quoting: Justme C'est Moi I guess they left one astronaut on the Moon to handle the camera work. :) And that flying spam can performed a perfectly controlled ascent and didn't tumble around like it should have. Did they have high speed vectored thrust engines back then? remote controlled camera? Back then a remote controlled camera, controlled by what? radar? Would have been rather amazing tech for the day. TV remotes that in any way resemble modern remotes didn't happen until the mid 70's. I remember seeing one. You pressed the button and I think it emitted a whistle or some nonsense. And cameras were big and heavy back then. and something kept the camera pointed at the target. Another astronaut joystick? Hey, we are spiralling out of control, a little help? No can do Buzz, I am manning the camera pan and tilt joystick. Then that abandoned camera has to transmit the images to Earth. In the 1960's. Most cameras back then used film. Needed to be developed. This had to be a modern camera that captures images electronically and transmits without visiting a dark room first. Big hulking cameras! [link to i.pinimg.com (secure)] Could not be controlled by an astronaut. The Baud rate on that camera transmitter would have taken a minute or so just to transmit 1 frame of image. Maybe the camera was on a wind up clock spring that would perform the anticipated tracking movements, initiated by an astronaut pulling a long string right at launch? LOL It was controlled by the same guy that controlled it during all the EVAs. Ed Fendell in Houston. Remotely controlled via a radio signal. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42289153 United States 07/05/2021 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598
User ID: 80141479 United States 07/05/2021 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My question has always been where did they attach the Rover or parts on the Lander? Never seen any photo with it on display. Quoting: Boss351Mustang Folded up and attached to the descent stage. Really easy to find info on it if you look. The LMs used for Apollo 15, 16, and 17 were also slightly larger allowing for a greater payload and longer stays [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Last Edited by LHP598 on 07/05/2021 05:21 PM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Boss351Mustang
User ID: 78050848 Canada 07/05/2021 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77302271 United States 07/05/2021 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77302271 United States 07/05/2021 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
47 User ID: 80567299 Canada 07/05/2021 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's hillarious. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80265194 When every kg matters tremendously - you now take a car. The car is borderline useless too. The car is an unnecessary danger. You wear a suit that undergoes massive temperature differences, yet you will subject it to stress and damage of sitting on a chair, risk rupturing it when getting on and off the car. Then taking it out of the lunar module, assembling it in a space suit. It's all unnecessary trouble and risk, for next to nothing. It's beyond ridiculous. It's obviously an American fairy tale for boys brought up on superhero comic books. There are a million other things, but this one makes me laugh whenever I think of it. A fucking jeep on the moon. 50 years ago. When nobody can even send a human past the Low Earth Orbit in 2021. Imagine that: It's 2021 and still nobody ever sent a human past the Low Earth Orbit, EXCEPT for the moon missions, when not only did they send people to the moon and back, but even made them drive a car on the moon. It's such an obvious a joke and some people still can't see it. If you truly believe the moon landings were faked, You haven't done enough research in areas of Science, Radio, and Astronomy to cover the fact we have been to the moon. Its a stupid conspiracy, much like flat earth, that we "Didn't" go. Which side do you want to be on, the smarter humans or the dumb, illiterate humans who will believe anything? It was easier to do moon landings back then, The rockets that were used and manufactured are no longer made in America or made in general, and theres miles long list of health and safety material to pay attention to which didn't exist back in the 70's. You just aren't thinking. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35528647 Australia 07/05/2021 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's hillarious. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80265194 When every kg matters tremendously - you now take a car. The car is borderline useless too. The car is an unnecessary danger. You wear a suit that undergoes massive temperature differences, yet you will subject it to stress and damage of sitting on a chair, risk rupturing it when getting on and off the car. Then taking it out of the lunar module, assembling it in a space suit. It's all unnecessary trouble and risk, for next to nothing. It's beyond ridiculous. It's obviously an American fairy tale for boys brought up on superhero comic books. There are a million other things, but this one makes me laugh whenever I think of it. A fucking jeep on the moon. 50 years ago. When nobody can even send a human past the Low Earth Orbit in 2021. Imagine that: It's 2021 and still nobody ever sent a human past the Low Earth Orbit, EXCEPT for the moon missions, when not only did they send people to the moon and back, but even made them drive a car on the moon. It's such an obvious a joke and some people still can't see it. If you truly believe the moon landings were faked, You haven't done enough research in areas of Science, Radio, and Astronomy to cover the fact we have been to the moon. Its a stupid conspiracy, much like flat earth, that we "Didn't" go. Which side do you want to be on, the smarter humans or the dumb, illiterate humans who will believe anything? It was easier to do moon landings back then, The rockets that were used and manufactured are no longer made in America or made in general, and theres miles long list of health and safety material to pay attention to which didn't exist back in the 70's. You just aren't thinking. What an absolutely and outstandingly dumb ass post, do you get paid to post pure bullshit such as this? ‘It was easier to do moon landings back then’ Are you fucking retarded? Nice try shill... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80561239 Poland 07/05/2021 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My question has always been where did they attach the Rover or parts on the Lander? Never seen any photo with it on display. Quoting: Boss351Mustang Folded up and attached to the descent stage. Really easy to find info on it if you look. The LMs used for Apollo 15, 16, and 17 were also slightly larger allowing for a greater payload and longer stays [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Interesting. So it takes about 15 men and a lot of manual help to unfold this shit on Earth. Now do it on the moon, with 2 people in fucking space suits. If anything goes wrong and you get hurt by it - bye bye. If you can't deploy it, your craft is too heavy to take off - bye bye. Sounds legit. |
LHP598
User ID: 80141479 United States 07/05/2021 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My question has always been where did they attach the Rover or parts on the Lander? Never seen any photo with it on display. Quoting: Boss351Mustang Folded up and attached to the descent stage. Really easy to find info on it if you look. The LMs used for Apollo 15, 16, and 17 were also slightly larger allowing for a greater payload and longer stays [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Interesting. So it takes about 15 men and a lot of manual help to unfold this shit on Earth. Now do it on the moon, with 2 people in fucking space suits. If anything goes wrong and you get hurt by it - bye bye. If you can't deploy it, your craft is too heavy to take off - bye bye. Sounds legit. It is heavier on Earth and they were testing it. Lots of people standing around watching. At most 2 and usually just one person is actually deploying it. How do you envision they "get hurt by it"? It weighs less, they move it slowly, and the pressure layer of their suit is about 12 layers down. If they can't deploy it, it is attached to the DESCENT stage. It has no effect on the ASCENT stage so they can still take off. Last Edited by LHP598 on 07/05/2021 07:09 PM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The takeoff camera even pans upward to follow the ascent vehicle. Quoting: Justme C'est Moi I guess they left one astronaut on the Moon to handle the camera work. :) And that flying spam can performed a perfectly controlled ascent and didn't tumble around like it should have. Did they have high speed vectored thrust engines back then? remote controlled camera? Back then a remote controlled camera, controlled by what? radar? Would have been rather amazing tech for the day. TV remotes that in any way resemble modern remotes didn't happen until the mid 70's. I remember seeing one. You pressed the button and I think it emitted a whistle or some nonsense. And cameras were big and heavy back then. and something kept the camera pointed at the target. Another astronaut joystick? Hey, we are spiralling out of control, a little help? No can do Buzz, I am manning the camera pan and tilt joystick. Then that abandoned camera has to transmit the images to Earth. In the 1960's. Most cameras back then used film. Needed to be developed. This had to be a modern camera that captures images electronically and transmits without visiting a dark room first. Big hulking cameras! [link to i.pinimg.com (secure)] Could not be controlled by an astronaut. The Baud rate on that camera transmitter would have taken a minute or so just to transmit 1 frame of image. Maybe the camera was on a wind up clock spring that would perform the anticipated tracking movements, initiated by an astronaut pulling a long string right at launch? LOL It was controlled by the same guy that controlled it during all the EVAs. Ed Fendell in Houston. Remotely controlled via a radio signal. 2.5 second time delay in the signal would make that a bit difficult. But perhaps, if it is a wide shot. Justme |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My question has always been where did they attach the Rover or parts on the Lander? Never seen any photo with it on display. Quoting: Boss351Mustang Folded up and attached to the descent stage. Really easy to find info on it if you look. The LMs used for Apollo 15, 16, and 17 were also slightly larger allowing for a greater payload and longer stays [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Interesting. So it takes about 15 men and a lot of manual help to unfold this shit on Earth. Now do it on the moon, with 2 people in fucking space suits. If anything goes wrong and you get hurt by it - bye bye. If you can't deploy it, your craft is too heavy to take off - bye bye. Sounds legit. OMG, the thing has a bunch of simple rope pulleys, which seem to be pre-reeved. I guess those NASA pulleys can survive the rigors of launch and so forth without the ropes getting messed up? ANd plastic see through tires. nice. And everything is covered by a layer of that wrinkly assed gold foil. LIke a big Ferrero Roche Bon Bon. :) Last Edited by JustmeTX on 07/06/2021 07:10 PM Justme |
Justme C'est Moi
User ID: 80193276 United States 07/05/2021 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They went to the Moon 6 times in all. Why did they go six times? Seems like just repeating. Last Edited by JustmeTX on 07/06/2021 07:10 PM Justme |
LHP598
User ID: 80141479 United States 07/06/2021 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back then a remote controlled camera, controlled by what? radar? Would have been rather amazing tech for the day. TV remotes that in any way resemble modern remotes didn't happen until the mid 70's. I remember seeing one. You pressed the button and I think it emitted a whistle or some nonsense. And cameras were big and heavy back then. and something kept the camera pointed at the target. Another astronaut joystick? Hey, we are spiralling out of control, a little help? No can do Buzz, I am manning the camera pan and tilt joystick. Then that abandoned camera has to transmit the images to Earth. In the 1960's. Most cameras back then used film. Needed to be developed. This had to be a modern camera that captures images electronically and transmits without visiting a dark room first. Big hulking cameras! [link to i.pinimg.com (secure)] Could not be controlled by an astronaut. The Baud rate on that camera transmitter would have taken a minute or so just to transmit 1 frame of image. Maybe the camera was on a wind up clock spring that would perform the anticipated tracking movements, initiated by an astronaut pulling a long string right at launch? LOL It was controlled by the same guy that controlled it during all the EVAs. Ed Fendell in Houston. Remotely controlled via a radio signal. 2.5 second time delay in the signal would make that a bit difficult. But perhaps, if it is a wide shot. They know the launch time and they know the delay. Not hard to send the signal early to pan up. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80494981 United States 07/06/2021 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |