Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,643 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 574,493
Pageviews Today: 749,385Threads Today: 225Posts Today: 3,038
06:38 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Facebook Can Be Held Liable For Not Protecting Against Underage Sex Trafficking, Court Rules

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79542810
United States
06/27/2021 11:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Facebook Can Be Held Liable For Not Protecting Against Underage Sex Trafficking, Court Rules
The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Friday:

Facebook failed to protect against teen sex trafficking, court rules, paving the way for tech companies to be held liable when they're used for criminal activity.

The plaintiffs in the case argued that Facebook did not attempt to stop sex trafficking on its platform.

Facebook argued that Section 230 protected them.

The Texas Supreme Court said Section 230 doesn’t mean Facebook can operate as a “lawless no-man’s-land,”

In 2020 in the U.S., 59% of online recruitment of identified victims in active cases took place on Facebook alone. The report also states that 65% of identified child sex trafficking victims recruited on social media were recruited through Facebook.

[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80536840
United States
06/27/2021 11:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Facebook Can Be Held Liable For Not Protecting Against Underage Sex Trafficking, Court Rules
angryface

I'm thinking that this is just cloaked antisemitism in some way.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80124667
06/27/2021 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Facebook Can Be Held Liable For Not Protecting Against Underage Sex Trafficking, Court Rules
give her the ball.......





GLP