The whole covid vax shedding thing is disinfo; another psyop

It’s supposed to be 7-10 days. Happened to me. But yeah, there can be so many confounding factors, I don’t buy it. People are treating shedding like they treated Covid itself. You can have any problem in the world, but it suddenly gets worse, it must be the vax. I think the vax is awful. I won’t take it. I don’t think shedding is completely impossible. But it takes two doses injected into your body to make them happy. I don’t think breathing some errant proteins is going to be a problem. I refuse to buy into the separate and divide agenda to be fearful of people.

Just because I think the vaccine shedding is from a kind of hysteria, doesn't mean I'm going to allow the mad scientists who believe they're gods to change my body function permanently from the way our loving Father and Creator designed it to operate.

Father knows best.

It's very creepy the division and separation that people are striving for in our society.

[link to www.newscientist.com (secure)]

We now have the technology to develop vaccines that spread themselves

Read more: [link to www.newscientist.com (secure)]



These “self-disseminating vaccines” can be developed in at least two ways. The conventional approach relies on applying a vaccine to the fur of captured animals and releasing them. When these animals return to their natural homes, social grooming results in the vaccine being ingested by other individuals, magnifying the level of immunity that can be achieved.

This shows promise for reducing the threat of rabies transmitted to humans from vampire bats, for example.

Not the same thing at all.

do tell.

That was a very interesting video, suspect for sure.

Hey OP,. What is the date of your last menstruation and how heavy was it? Did you feel more bitchy than usual?

Are they applying this vaccine to the fur of the pieces of s*** humans who get it? No! so it's not the same thing you f****** retards

No, THIS POST IS DISINFO
A long-time friend of mine on social media, her hubby is in a band...they are in their 50s...one of the band members went to get vaxxed ...came back to practice...every single member not only got very sick, but their entire families at home did too...they caught it after they went to their homes!!! Fuck your LIES.

That would be like getting peanut butter infused with vaccine smeared on your skin and someone licking it off.

Yeah I know a mom who got vaxxed and brought it home to her family, two of her kids got Covid. She isolated them and enjoyed her new freedom because ya know she was vaxxed!


.

LOL I find it hilarious and hypocritical that all of your main arguments for shedding are: "it's in Pfizer's documents"

Since WHEN are the vaccine manufacturers EVER credible?! They are always lieing! You really believe what they are selling, just as long as it supports whichever side you're on, right? Lol

This is where discernment will go a long way to help you sift through and discard the sensational.

Yes, there are at least two places in the Pfizer study that allude to and infer viral shedding, Pages 67/68 and 132.

Study Details:

A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
Study Sponsor:
BioNTech
Study Conducted By:
Pfizer
Study Intervention Number:
PF-07302048
Study Intervention Name:
RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines
US IND Number:
19736
EudraCT Number:
2020-002641-42
Protocol Number:
C4591001
Phase:
1/2/3
Short Title: A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals

Pfizer alludes to and infers the possibility of viral shedding in its own document, see Pages 67/68 and 132.

A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
Study Sponsor:
BioNTech
Study Conducted By:
Pfizer
Study Intervention Number:
PF-07302048
Study Intervention Name:
RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines
US IND Number:
19736
EudraCT Number:
2020-002641-42
Protocol Number:
C4591001
Phase:
1/2/3
Short Title: A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals

Pfizer alludes to and infers shedding in its own protocol study.

From Page 132:

10.4. Appendix 4: Contraceptive Guidance
10.4.1. Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s):
• Refrain from donating sperm.
PLUS either:
• Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent.
OR
• Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person.
• In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly effective methods below in Section 10.4.4).
10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least 1 of the following conditions applies:
• Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3).
OR
• Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.

It’s probably the time to put masks on. Especially when the government says take them off and go out and party.

They don’t know since it’s experimental. It goes on until 2023. Then we’ll know for sure. Be careful around the vaxxed.

Masks do work to keep people’s spit off of you and for larger bacteria. And some viruses(not all) can stick to the mask thus lowering the viral load. It’s just that masks shouldn’t be worn for long periods of time. It will stop the breathing in of something skin cells as well. It’s the spike protein that is the problem. A mask could help with that.

That is not true, Dr. Luc Montagnier who identified HIV has been quite vocal about his beliefs, from the CV19 being lab modified through the gain of function research to stating you should not take the shot.

No one knows for sure. Best to err on the side of caution now. We’ll see how people cope this fall and winter. I don’t think it is time to let our guard down. The government wants us to though. Think about that.

That genetically engineered mutant spike protein is in the virus; which is real and from a lab, and the vaccines. If that spike protein has already penetrated your system, it's in there slowly doing it's work.

And remember at first they didn't want anyone to wear masks and assured everyone that it wasn't able to be transmitted through the air.

The depopulationists have the vaccinated deceived into thinking they are safe, they have the unvaccinated fooled into thinking they are safe. They will have almost full coverage of the entire global population with their frankenstein spike protein and are on track to reach their 85-95% reduction goals.

I pray for you all, those mutant spike proteins will prove to be the gift that keeps on giving; like lab made prions.

You have a point.

Shedding after a vaxx is just fact actually.

This injection is not a vax so it could and obviously is doing some rather nefarious shit...

it is and 5 g.

The creator of the mrna vax said that, yes. there is shedding of the spikes...but that it shouldn't be enough to do damage... "shouldn't" is the key part.

Admission by the scientist that shedding of protein spikes does occur. Time will tell if it is enough to do damage.

Check out Ricky from Boston.....He does a show and connects all the doctors through one organization. It opened my eyes to the farce.

I think they are "shedding" Synthia, an artificial life form that feeds on carbon

Mycoplasma laboratorium

Mycoplasma laboratorium or Synthia[b 1] refers to a synthetic strain of bacterium. The project to build the new bacterium has evolved since its inception. Initially the goal was to identify a minimal set of genes that are required to sustain life from the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium, and rebuild these genes synthetically to create a "new" organism. Mycoplasma genitalium was originally chosen as the basis for this project because at the time it had the smallest number of genes of all organisms analyzed. Later, the focus switched to Mycoplasma mycoides and took a more trial-and-error approach.[b 2]

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Talks about vaccines at 16:16