Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79096776 United States 05/21/2021 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
NoCap
User ID: 70591657 United States 05/21/2021 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' After massive voter fraud is found in AZ, the rest of the swing states will fall like Dominos. There will be hard evidence to have a full audit in every state, and those states are Red outside the 1 or 2 Democratic precincts that hundreds of thousands of votes were fabricated. Quoting: Shamrock00007 They won't even have to prove the electronic fraud on the Dominion machines. That wasn't enough cheating for them to win, hence them stopping counting in every single swing state on election night, so they had time to fabricate more mail-in ballots. If they do prove Dominion flipped 2-3% of the vote it will only be icing on the cake. So when do we bring out the torches and pitchforks? I don't think anything changes without something that severe. Most people are clueless or don't care, or actually support this theft because orange man bad. How long until the united States government is drone striking civilians who are "suspected terrorists?" This country is so fucked. I think after they have hard evidence after full audit's the Supreme Court will hear the cases. When they tried to get the cases heard before, none of the states did a full audit. The evidence pretty much consisted of affidavits signed by poll workers, most if not all were poll workers and not in the upper management of the polling places (the people running the counts). That's a huge difference between that evidence, and the evidence of a full audit where they are checking signatures, address, if people are alive and an actual resident of the area they voted in, etc... What makes you think SCOTUS will deem that it has the power to overturn the results of the 2020 election? The Chief Justice swore Biden into office. The election was held and it’s over now. The issues are all moot and the parties lack standing. There is no legal precedent in this country for overturning the results of an election. SCOTUS literally doesn’t even have legal authority to reverse or change the results, even if they were to agree that fraud occurred (which they don’t). It’s over. Being sworn in doesn't mean anything. There are plenty of people who have been sworn into their positions and have been removed for various reasons. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76766078 Germany 05/21/2021 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' I know right? These morons think standing is a “technicality.” God knows the Constitution isn’t important to them, much less Art. III Section 2 Clause 1. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910 "Standing" has always been a loosely interpreted concept usually used by courts to excuse themselves from potentially embarrassing outcomes. It's an interpreted "doctrine" and should never be used in something as potentially devastating as fraud at the federal level. The US citizens deserve to have their concerns adjudicated properly without activist judges, or cowardly judges, brushing off their grievances based on the doctrine of "standing". In an election, at the very least, the opposing candidate has standing if they can offer proof of fraud or misconduct. It's a legal cop-out, plain and simple. ---snip--- Standing as a doctrine is composed of both constitutional and prudential restraints on the power of the federal courts to render decisions,4 and is almost exclusively concerned with such public law questions as determinations of constitutionality and review of administrative or other governmental action.5 As such, it is often interpreted according to the prevailing philosophies of judicial activism and restraint, and narrowly or broadly in terms of the viewed desirability of access to the courts by persons seeking to challenge legislation or other governmental action. ---snip--- [link to constitution.congress.gov (secure)] Courts routinely hear cases on mundane issues where very little real collateral exists regardless of who wins or loses the case. Things of this magnitude should never be outright dismissed using the legal cop-out of "standing". Aside from the snippet, which doesn’t contradict anything I’ve said, everything you’ve said is total bullshit and not a single legal scholar in the United States will back you up on that. Just thought you should know. You pseudo-intellectual libtards make it way too easy. The concept behind the standing doctrine has been debated by scholars since it was first brought into use during George Washington's era. They entire concept of the standing doctrine is based upon the requirement that a plaintiff show that he or she has suffered "injury in fact", which is a key requirement of the Court's doctrine of standing. An opposing candidate in an election that was ripe with fraud certainly meets that criteria. Standing doctrine confuses both lower courts and litigants, because the Court manipulates the doctrine to serve other objectives. When the Court wants to reach the merits of a case, the standing doctrine is often relaxed. Conversely, when the Court wishes to avoid deciding the merits of a case--or perhaps, when it wants to shut a whole category of cases out of court--, the requirements for standing are tightened. Therefore the entire doctrine of standing is based upon a fundamentally unequal application of the law, which is why it's abused by activist judges, and should be revised to avoid this miscarriage of justice in the future. It's the equivalent of a cop turning a blind eye to a family member breaking the law, while aggressively pursuing a non-family member for breaking that same law. As far as scholars throughout history that agree with my point of view here's a few to get you started on your journey of knowledge: [link to www.jdsupra.com (secure)] [link to scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu (secure)] [link to repository.law.umich.edu (secure)] [link to law2.umkc.edu] I could provide 100's more links if you're too inept to use a search engine. Just let me know, I'm always happy to assist the mentally deficient. The future will be different, but I don't think you're going to like those differences. |
TL83
User ID: 80220661 United States 05/21/2021 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76013001 05/21/2021 08:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' Our Constitution makes clear that fraud in ANY part of an election is ground for making the outcome null. Quoting: Mack In that case, the incumbent would remain in office. In 2024, the American people would have another opportunity to operate a Presidential election. This time without any "fortifying" of the process, as Time magazine coyly labeled that brazen, un-American behavior. THE PROBLEM IS THE SYSTEM IS BEYOND REPAIR, AND THE DECLARATION OF INDENPENDENCE AND CONSTITUTION MAKE IT CLEAR THAT ONLY SOLUTION FOR TYRANNY IS SECOND AMENDMENT ACTION TO ABOLISH THAT CORRUPT GOV'T. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79718120 United States 05/21/2021 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80264733 United States 05/21/2021 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910 It’s too funny seeing you idiots set yourselves up for disappointment over and over again. You’ll still be talking about this same exact shit in 2023. Too fucking funny. Well MSM is melting down about the audits and the DNC sure is sending 100's of lawyers that tried and failed to stop the audit in AZ. Kind of weird for something you're just laughing about as nothing will happen. Their frenzied efforts to stop any audit just shows their guilt. Would you be OK with it if AOC and BLN recounted Ohio? How about Florida? N.C.? Don’t play dumb, Trumphead. You know why the so-called “audit” in AZ is a farce. The panic grows. "Mourning Joe" practically blew a gasket. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73905216 Canada 05/21/2021 09:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73371088 United States 05/21/2021 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' ... Quoting: Shamrock00007 Well MSM is melting down about the audits and the DNC sure is sending 100's of lawyers that tried and failed to stop the audit in AZ. Kind of weird for something you're just laughing about as nothing will happen. Their frenzied efforts to stop any audit just shows their guilt. Would you be OK with it if AOC and BLN recounted Ohio? How about Florida? N.C.? Don’t play dumb, Trumphead. You know why the so-called “audit” in AZ is a farce. The panic grows. "Mourning Joe" practically blew a gasket. maddcow is choking on her own spit over AZ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80039226 United States 05/21/2021 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79540191 United States 05/21/2021 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80061903 United States 05/21/2021 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77118015 United States 05/21/2021 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice' |