Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,172 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 519,542
Pageviews Today: 893,598Threads Today: 392Posts Today: 6,148
11:20 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79096776
United States
05/21/2021 07:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Prescott Bush paid 2 million fine for supporting Hitler

G bush sr yeah head of CIA when Kennedy killed

wake the fuck up or be a better trolls shill
NoCap

User ID: 70591657
United States
05/21/2021 07:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
After massive voter fraud is found in AZ, the rest of the swing states will fall like Dominos. There will be hard evidence to have a full audit in every state, and those states are Red outside the 1 or 2 Democratic precincts that hundreds of thousands of votes were fabricated.

They won't even have to prove the electronic fraud on the Dominion machines. That wasn't enough cheating for them to win, hence them stopping counting in every single swing state on election night, so they had time to fabricate more mail-in ballots. If they do prove Dominion flipped 2-3% of the vote it will only be icing on the cake.
 Quoting: Shamrock00007


So when do we bring out the torches and pitchforks?

I don't think anything changes without something that severe.

Most people are clueless or don't care, or actually support this theft because orange man bad.

How long until the united States government is drone striking civilians who are "suspected terrorists?"

This country is so fucked.
 Quoting: Mr. Cheeze


I think after they have hard evidence after full audit's the Supreme Court will hear the cases. When they tried to get the cases heard before, none of the states did a full audit. The evidence pretty much consisted of affidavits signed by poll workers, most if not all were poll workers and not in the upper management of the polling places (the people running the counts).

That's a huge difference between that evidence, and the evidence of a full audit where they are checking signatures, address, if people are alive and an actual resident of the area they voted in, etc...
 Quoting: Shamrock00007


What makes you think SCOTUS will deem that it has the power to overturn the results of the 2020 election?

The Chief Justice swore Biden into office. The election was held and it’s over now. The issues are all moot and the parties lack standing. There is no legal precedent in this country for overturning the results of an election. SCOTUS literally doesn’t even have legal authority to reverse or change the results, even if they were to agree that fraud occurred (which they don’t).

It’s over.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


Being sworn in doesn't mean anything. There are plenty of people who have been sworn into their positions and have been removed for various reasons.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76766078
Germany
05/21/2021 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
I know right? These morons think standing is a “technicality.” God knows the Constitution isn’t important to them, much less Art. III Section 2 Clause 1.

1rof1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


"Standing" has always been a loosely interpreted concept usually used by courts to excuse themselves from potentially embarrassing outcomes.

It's an interpreted "doctrine" and should never be used in something as potentially devastating as fraud at the federal level.

The US citizens deserve to have their concerns adjudicated properly without activist judges, or cowardly judges, brushing off their grievances based on the doctrine of "standing".

In an election, at the very least, the opposing candidate has standing if they can offer proof of fraud or misconduct.

It's a legal cop-out, plain and simple.

---snip---

Standing as a doctrine is composed of both constitutional and prudential restraints on the power of the federal courts to render decisions,4 and is almost exclusively concerned with such public law questions as determinations of constitutionality and review of administrative or other governmental action.5 As such, it is often interpreted according to the prevailing philosophies of judicial activism and restraint, and narrowly or broadly in terms of the viewed desirability of access to the courts by persons seeking to challenge legislation or other governmental action.

---snip---

[link to constitution.congress.gov (secure)]


Courts routinely hear cases on mundane issues where very little real collateral exists regardless of who wins or loses the case.

Things of this magnitude should never be outright dismissed using the legal cop-out of "standing".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76766078


Aside from the snippet, which doesn’t contradict anything I’ve said, everything you’ve said is total bullshit and not a single legal scholar in the United States will back you up on that.

Just thought you should know.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


You pseudo-intellectual libtards make it way too easy.

The concept behind the standing doctrine has been debated by scholars since it was first brought into use during George Washington's era.

They entire concept of the standing doctrine is based upon the requirement that a plaintiff show that he or she has suffered "injury in fact", which is a key requirement of the Court's doctrine of standing.

An opposing candidate in an election that was ripe with fraud certainly meets that criteria.

Standing doctrine confuses both lower courts and litigants, because the Court manipulates the doctrine to serve other objectives. When the Court wants to reach the merits of a case, the standing doctrine is often relaxed. Conversely, when the Court wishes to avoid deciding the merits of a case--or perhaps, when it wants to shut a whole category of cases out of court--, the requirements for standing are tightened.

Therefore the entire doctrine of standing is based upon a fundamentally unequal application of the law, which is why it's abused by activist judges, and should be revised to avoid this miscarriage of justice in the future.

It's the equivalent of a cop turning a blind eye to a family member breaking the law, while aggressively pursuing a non-family member for breaking that same law.

As far as scholars throughout history that agree with my point of view here's a few to get you started on your journey of knowledge:

[link to www.jdsupra.com (secure)]

[link to scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu (secure)]

[link to repository.law.umich.edu (secure)]

[link to law2.umkc.edu]

I could provide 100's more links if you're too inept to use a search engine.

Just let me know, I'm always happy to assist the mentally deficient.

The future will be different, but I don't think you're going to like those differences.
TL83

User ID: 80220661
United States
05/21/2021 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Great!!! But where TF were these judges right after the election??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76013001
05/21/2021 08:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Our Constitution makes clear that fraud in ANY part of an election is ground for making the outcome null.

In that case, the incumbent would remain in office.

In 2024, the American people would have another opportunity to operate a Presidential election.

This time without any "fortifying" of the process, as Time magazine coyly labeled that brazen, un-American behavior.
 Quoting: Mack


THE PROBLEM IS THE SYSTEM IS BEYOND REPAIR,
AND THE DECLARATION OF INDENPENDENCE AND CONSTITUTION
MAKE IT CLEAR THAT ONLY SOLUTION FOR TYRANNY IS SECOND AMENDMENT ACTION TO ABOLISH THAT CORRUPT GOV'T.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79718120
United States
05/21/2021 08:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Vote recount number 4 for the sore losers
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80264733
United States
05/21/2021 09:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
...


It’s too funny seeing you idiots set yourselves up for disappointment over and over again. You’ll still be talking about this same exact shit in 2023. Too fucking funny.

lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


Well MSM is melting down about the audits and the DNC sure is sending 100's of lawyers that tried and failed to stop the audit in AZ. Kind of weird for something you're just laughing about as nothing will happen.
 Quoting: Shamrock00007


Their frenzied efforts to stop any audit just shows their guilt.
 Quoting: Thorbulla


Would you be OK with it if AOC and BLN recounted Ohio? How about Florida? N.C.?

Don’t play dumb, Trumphead. You know why the so-called “audit” in AZ is a farce.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


The panic grows.

"Mourning Joe" practically blew a gasket.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73905216
Canada
05/21/2021 09:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Vote recount number 4 for the sore losers
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79718120


People like you are the reason this problem exists. So, suck it up buttercup
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73371088
United States
05/21/2021 09:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
...


Well MSM is melting down about the audits and the DNC sure is sending 100's of lawyers that tried and failed to stop the audit in AZ. Kind of weird for something you're just laughing about as nothing will happen.
 Quoting: Shamrock00007


Their frenzied efforts to stop any audit just shows their guilt.
 Quoting: Thorbulla


Would you be OK with it if AOC and BLN recounted Ohio? How about Florida? N.C.?

Don’t play dumb, Trumphead. You know why the so-called “audit” in AZ is a farce.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910


The panic grows.

"Mourning Joe" practically blew a gasket.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80264733


maddcow is choking on her own spit over AZ
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80039226
United States
05/21/2021 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
"Kraken" # 44 ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79540191
United States
05/21/2021 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
BS, didn't do anything the first time won't do anything this time
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80061903
United States
05/21/2021 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
Why are the Democrats so afraid of Math? If the math is accurate then an audit should confirm that. If the Math isn't accurate.....well,that explains the hissy fit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77118015
United States
05/21/2021 10:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Georgia - Judge permits absentee ballots to be unsealed - ‘A Large Number Of Ballots Appear To Have Been Counted Twice'
 Quoting: jlee2027


prove it in a court of law.

oh wait, you can't


epiclol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69637842


Actually all we have to do is prove it to the Judge that ordered the audit of the ballots in his court of law.





GLP