LEAKED FOOTAGE reveals BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors compares her own book to Mao’s Little Red Book & encourages youth to buy her writing

:mao:

Juan is a communist

:juanstar:

I'm a commie, but I would never trust her. If she blames white people for black people's misfortune, she definitely doesn't understand Communism and I would never want her to be leading kids in this regard and would not want anyone to follow what she writes. Uber rich people is who she should be blaming - not the white people.

Isn't she the one buying the mansions?

Isn't she the Uber-Rich you speak of?

it's just a puppet, its book was likely someone else' work handed to it like everything else. even the tweet was likely copied and pasted its master's instruction

Bingo. She is just a brainwashed uber-social democrat, who will promise anything for votes. She knows nothing about Communism and what it is about and it is expected that most people don't understand Communism, especially the Western people. Even many people who lived in the USSR in the 80s didn't understand it. Ordinary white people did not own slaves during slavery in America. Ordinary white people were forced into the slavery culture, where the ruling elite saw serving them to treat the blacks as sub-humans and forced the rest into this culture. Why is it then that the regular white people, who happen to be the Middle class of America, predominantly, have to pay for the transgressions of the ruling elite, who happen to be a small number of people? The ruling elite is trying to fix the society. That is, they have a big black people problem and they need to throw them a bone. That bone could be the reparations that the blacks want. However, they don't want to pay for that. They want the Middle class to pay for it. They first create a fake sentiment with activism to make the white people accept responsibility for what the ruling class did to blacks during slavery. Then, with the help of some politicians, they will introduce a law which will transfer the money from the Middle class to the Bottom class. Look at the chart below. Look at Obama's period. You can see that under Obama the wealth of the Top 1%, Next 9%, and the Bottom 50% increased while the wealth of the Middle class decreased. But they all thought that Obama was great for the masses.

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

To piggyback on what I said above, I want to help people understand the difference between uber-socialist democrats and communists. That is Social Democracy vs Communism.

First, there are 2 types of Social Democracies: Capitalism (USA) and State Capitalism (Russia and China).

Not all businesses are controlled by states in Russia and China - only the businesses that have a power over the people and there is a risk that the abuse of this power could result in any kind of negative impact on the people.

For example, China and Russia would long ago nationalize the "MSM", the Military Industrial Complex, the Big Oil, the Big Tech, as well as reigned-in all oligarchs. These entities would continue to operate as usual and would have managers who would get world class salaries but the control and ownership of these companies would belong to the people because it is unacceptable to the people that they are used to defend the interests of these big entities. Oligarchs would be put on notice that their actions are being monitored.

People have a right not to be subjects of brainwashing and propaganda by the elite. People have a right that their children aren't sent to wars under false pretexts to defend the interests of the Big Oil and the Military Industrial Complex. People have a right to say whatever they want and should not be subject to limited/approved speech. Hence why they have that State Capitalism instead of just plain Capitalism. In a plain Capitalism, the biggest problem you have is that the Big Whatever becomes so powerful that it becomes the controller of the government and hence it begins to rule the people by proxy. The government is their tool, the tool with which they rule the masses. And in the absence of politicians and statesmen that fiercely defend the interests of the people, that's what you're going to get. You will get government for the rich, a.k.a. Fascism.

So, how do you hide or dilute the harshness of Fascism in a system with Capitalism without the State factor? You use Socialism! You treat it as a tool that can put out fires. You sprinkle Socialism here and there, wherever it is necessary to make the hotbeds of fire to go out. As long as there aren't hundreds of thousands of people ready to take to the streets, your rule is safe.

This allows us to make the conclusion that the difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is the amount of Socialism. They both agree that there must be some Socialism. However, Republicans want to minimize the Socialism and they don't use it as their cure to the problems, while Democrats use Socialism to get more votes.

Communism would have none of this crazy shit.

sickening

Thanks for the considerate addition to this thread

probably. maybe she is being "groomed" like obama was with his lame ass work in south chicago.

She foolin sooo many peeps so she have biggest houses for her phat azz

alot better than yo nazi ass

she's a fake