JUST IN: Chauvin Lawyer Files Motion For a New Trial, Alleging Jury Misconduct | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79240330 United States 05/06/2021 09:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The shirt was the logo for the "Martin Luther King memorial" he attended, which was all a 'demonstration against police brutality' with a tiny bit of Martin Luther King attached to it. That is the event was also called the "Get Your Hands Off Our Necks" march. He and/or journalists are pretending it's simply a MLK Memorial, and it will be up to the defense lawyer to demonstrate that it was such a demonstration against police brutality (which it was). It was a "Black Lives Matter" hat and a "Get Your Knee off Our Necks" BLM shirt, directly referring to George Floyd. Doesn't get more obvious than that. So fugging what??? The cop is guilty as hell. Racist POS! Sixth Amendment guarantees a fair trial by UNBIASED jurors. Not 11 unbiased and 1 biased. Imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth that would have happened if the jury so happened to have 5 or 6 people who were seen in DC wearing TRUMP shirts or MAGA hats? The double standard is sickening. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70232357 United States 05/06/2021 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
muckuh
User ID: 80193698 United States 05/06/2021 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
muckuh
User ID: 80193698 United States 05/06/2021 11:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72717818 United States 05/08/2021 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72717818 United States 05/08/2021 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What a moron. Quoting: REaliZe Dude was wearing a George Floyd t-shirt and going to rallies, then lied to the judge & court and said he knew nothing about the case, then tells everyone post-conviction that more people need to lie & become jurors in order to fight the system. What a moron. annn yoo noe, dat demzz kneegur lawyuzz knooo dat!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76632117 United States 05/08/2021 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
936432979
User ID: 76832232 United States 05/08/2021 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He’ll get a long sentence with the hate crime penalty added. The motion for new trial will be denied because the defense lawyer could have asked better questions and eliminated that juror during the selection process but did not do so. |
GooPile
User ID: 80468885 Australia 06/29/2021 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The judge was a comedian. This is what he found: "2 3.Defendant has failed to establish a prima facie case of juror misconduct or that a juror gave false testimony during voir dire to warrant an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co., 104 N.W.2d 301 (Minn. 1960); State v. Usee, 800 N.W.2d 192 (Minn. App. 2011)." I hope that POS defense lawyer pointed out the non-Minneapolis specific question. I scanned over his paper arguments, not sure if there was any more spoken or unspoken, but all I saw there was the claim he answered 'no' to the Minneapolis question. I didn't see him bring up the non-Minneapolis question in that document. So if the judge was going off that solely, then maybe it isn't all the judges fault but defense incompetence. I never saw him answer 'no' to both questions, his form wasn't released publicly, but the media who had the document reported he answered 'no' to both questions. And they usually lie for the liberal cause. Last Edited by GooPile on 06/29/2021 06:56 AM GooPile |