| Users Online Now: 1,889 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 676,611 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,147,246 | Threads Today: 424 | Posts Today: 7,779 |
| 12:59 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,889 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 676,611 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,147,246 | Threads Today: 424 | Posts Today: 7,779 |
| 12:59 PM | ||
Derek Chauvin Trial - Day 9 - Livestream | |
BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816  United States04/08/2021 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380164944260370432 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| Revbo™
User ID: 80152479 United States04/08/2021 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
| here&back
User ID: 38487486 United States04/08/2021 04:32 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. An immediate family member of mine is a pathologist, told us a couple years ago that a lot of people who OD are the ones that were either first time users OR people that had gotten off and then relapsed. For some reason, you're even more susceptible when you relapse. Probably the healing process of the body, but that's why you find of lot of 'reformed' addicts overdosing after a small amount of ingesting. |
| Simple27
User ID: 78918190 United States04/08/2021 04:34 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. Good post Rev ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| ID2268
User ID: 78933608  United Kingdom04/08/2021 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is no way they can claim it was a death due to overdose. Quoting: ID2268 Those blood levels would put him way under what they've been finding people stopped for DUI with. I'm confident, unless the're lying about the fentanyl levels that he didn't die from an overdose. - maybe he just died of covid. he was positive. No ratio we don’t know what his standard use was! Plus there could have been multiple dose like one two hours before and then all the pills he swallowed after the cops came. i can guarantee you his standard use would of been of the level of at least someone who was able to still drive. swallowing extra pills wouldn't make a difference unless they had entered the blood already. so if they are still in the stomach and not detectable in the blood, they can't also contribute to death, because, if it's not in the blood yet it can't kill you. |
| <~>
User ID: 72134020 United States04/08/2021 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists |
| ID2268
User ID: 78933608 United Kingdom04/08/2021 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Sardonic Dadaist Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists What's stopping the jury just saying they have no doubt. |
| digitaldetective
User ID: 80179208 United States04/08/2021 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| <~>
User ID: 72134020 United States04/08/2021 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Straight from the CDC... Serum samples from the hospitalized patients analyzed at UCSF demonstrated fentanyl levels of 0.5–9.5 ng/mL (Table 2) (therapeutic range for analgesia = 0.6–3.0 ng/mL) (4); postmortem levels in the first two patients who died were 11 ng/mL (patient E) and 13 ng/mL (patient I). [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] ... Quoting: <~> For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists What's stopping the jury just saying they have no doubt. Can’t speak to them as I haven’t even seen them yet... but as a juror this would create doubt |
| <~>
User ID: 72134020 United States04/08/2021 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Sardonic Dadaist
User ID: 79047769 United States04/08/2021 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Sardonic Dadaist Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists If they did find a case of death from knee on the neck the question then is why was The cop trained that way? Last Edited by Sardonic Dadaist on 04/08/2021 04:42 PM Seeker 2 |
| Don Draper from Nantucket
User ID: 57553864 United States04/08/2021 04:40 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The issue here, and I’ll link it in a second is that there have been overdoses of people with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood.. Quoting: <~> Figures lie and liars figure... Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt.  PLATA BITCHEZZZZZZ UPGRADE UNAVAILABLE The Rolling Stones said it best... "What's confusing you is the nature of my game" |
| Corporal Punishment
User ID: 24262777 United States04/08/2021 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is no way they can claim it was a death due to overdose. Quoting: ID2268 Those blood levels would put him way under what they've been finding people stopped for DUI with. I'm confident, unless the're lying about the fentanyl levels that he didn't die from an overdose. - maybe he just died of covid. he was positive. No ratio we don’t know what his standard use was! Plus there could have been multiple dose like one two hours before and then all the pills he swallowed after the cops came. i can guarantee you his standard use would of been of the level of at least someone who was able to still drive. swallowing extra pills wouldn't make a difference unless they had entered the blood already. so if they are still in the stomach and not detectable in the blood, they can't also contribute to death, because, if it's not in the blood yet it can't kill you. Blood levels may not be everything. I get that, in general, the blood level may be a good indicator. But is that all there is to the issue? For instance, does the rapidity of administration of a drug matter? Does your blood level shooting up to some level make a difference as compared to slowly being raised to that level? |
| Revbo™
User ID: 80152479 United States04/08/2021 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Sardonic Dadaist Yep they find ODs at multiple levels. Hell most ODs are regular users that have a period of interruption jail, rehab, connections lost etc. that finally score again and do half or a third of what they regularly used and bam dead. How do we know where GF was on his drug use schedule? In my opinion all this does is creat an ambiguous un quantifiable cascade of several factors leading to death, in other words reasonable doubt. For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists That’s a very good point. So far, all we’ve heard is theories that a knee to the neck can kill someone. Surely, George Floyd is not the first person in history to take a knee to the neck, so where’s the other guy who died from that? It’s not a perfect analogy, but I can say I’ve had about 150 pounds worth of children on my back in a game of Ride The Horsey and had no trouble with it at all, and I’m nowhere near the physical specimen George Floyd was. John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Court Back in session now: "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| KansasisOz
User ID: 78764762 United States04/08/2021 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ID2268
User ID: 78933608 United Kingdom04/08/2021 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is no way they can claim it was a death due to overdose. Quoting: ID2268 Those blood levels would put him way under what they've been finding people stopped for DUI with. I'm confident, unless the're lying about the fentanyl levels that he didn't die from an overdose. - maybe he just died of covid. he was positive. No ratio we don’t know what his standard use was! Plus there could have been multiple dose like one two hours before and then all the pills he swallowed after the cops came. i can guarantee you his standard use would of been of the level of at least someone who was able to still drive. swallowing extra pills wouldn't make a difference unless they had entered the blood already. so if they are still in the stomach and not detectable in the blood, they can't also contribute to death, because, if it's not in the blood yet it can't kill you. Blood levels may not be everything. I get that, in general, the blood level may be a good indicator. But is that all there is to the issue? For instance, does the rapidity of administration of a drug matter? Does your blood level shooting up to some level make a difference as compared to slowly being raised to that level? the point is, until it gets into the blood it's not ingested yet. your stomach contents are outside of the body. if it isn't absorbed into the blood, it's not doing anything yet. |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380260315246526467 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| Corporal Punishment
User ID: 24262777 United States04/08/2021 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ID2268
User ID: 78933608 United Kingdom04/08/2021 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Sardonic Dadaist
User ID: 79047769 United States04/08/2021 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Sardonic Dadaist No ratio we don’t know what his standard use was! Plus there could have been multiple dose like one two hours before and then all the pills he swallowed after the cops came. i can guarantee you his standard use would of been of the level of at least someone who was able to still drive. swallowing extra pills wouldn't make a difference unless they had entered the blood already. so if they are still in the stomach and not detectable in the blood, they can't also contribute to death, because, if it's not in the blood yet it can't kill you. Blood levels may not be everything. I get that, in general, the blood level may be a good indicator. But is that all there is to the issue? For instance, does the rapidity of administration of a drug matter? Does your blood level shooting up to some level make a difference as compared to slowly being raised to that level? the point is, until it gets into the blood it's not ingested yet. your stomach contents are outside of the body. if it isn't absorbed into the blood, it's not doing anything yet. The point is it was slowly being absorbed raising over the 30 minutes he was interacting with police. Raising beyond his tolerance level. Seeker 2 |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380261283535142915 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| 18328
User ID: 80165748 United States04/08/2021 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: <~> For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists That’s a very good point. So far, all we’ve heard is theories that a knee to the neck can kill someone. Surely, George Floyd is not the first person in history to take a knee to the neck, so where’s the other guy who died from that? It’s not a perfect analogy, but I can say I’ve had about 150 pounds worth of children on my back in a game of Ride The Horsey and had no trouble with it at all, and I’m nowhere near the physical specimen George Floyd was. Let's hope that Nelson has something along these lines he will address when he has the defense witnesses on the stand. I just don't believe the knee on the shoulder/neck killed this guy and above all we need justice to be served, not pacification. |
| <~>
User ID: 72134020 United States04/08/2021 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: <~> For me it’s about finding a case study where someone died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their blood... I did and linked it.. That immediately creates reasonable doubt for me... I couldn’t as a juror vote to convict him on that fact alone... Exactly. It’s not the prosecution’s job to create reasonable doubt; it’s their job to prove Chauvin killed Floyd beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that other people have survived that much fentanyl doesn’t really help their case because, as long as one person has died as a result of that amount of fentanyl (and they have), it’s possible something other than Chauvin’s knee killed George Floyd, which is the definition of reasonable doubt. I agree 100%. Now if I were the prosecutor and I knew this, I would find a case study where someone had died from force on the neck... all they are saying is it could happen... but has it? I didn’t look into this as the toxicology report was my first piece of evidence... I’ve also been paying attention and I have yet to see this case study presented as evidence.. To sway me, I need to see a case study where someone died with a knee on their neck... Even then I would still have a hard time knowing that one can die from 11 ng/ml in their blood... Like you said, I would need irrefutable proof... which I really don’t think exists That’s a very good point. So far, all we’ve heard is theories that a knee to the neck can kill someone. Surely, George Floyd is not the first person in history to take a knee to the neck, so where’s the other guy who died from that? It’s not a perfect analogy, but I can say I’ve had about 150 pounds worth of children on my back in a game of Ride The Horsey and had no trouble with it at all, and I’m nowhere near the physical specimen George Floyd was. Yeah as I was typing I realized all they have presented is theories... where the overdose has actual case studies we can refer too... I’m sure Nelson is waiting till the last moment to present this... |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380261117105176581 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| ID2268
User ID: 78933608 United Kingdom04/08/2021 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ID2268 i can guarantee you his standard use would of been of the level of at least someone who was able to still drive. swallowing extra pills wouldn't make a difference unless they had entered the blood already. so if they are still in the stomach and not detectable in the blood, they can't also contribute to death, because, if it's not in the blood yet it can't kill you. Blood levels may not be everything. I get that, in general, the blood level may be a good indicator. But is that all there is to the issue? For instance, does the rapidity of administration of a drug matter? Does your blood level shooting up to some level make a difference as compared to slowly being raised to that level? the point is, until it gets into the blood it's not ingested yet. your stomach contents are outside of the body. if it isn't absorbed into the blood, it's not doing anything yet. The point is it was slowly being absorbed raising over the 30 minutes he was interacting with police. Raising beyond his tolerance level. you think his tolerance level as in his required dose to overdose and die was half that of the average found with those stopped for a DUI and still driving? that's a really really long stretch you're going for there. |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380262075239383045 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| BBQ BOY™
(OP) User ID: 72493816 United States04/08/2021 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1380262504618729475 "Never underestimate the pain of a person. In all honesty, everyone is struggling. Just some people are better at hiding it than others." Everyone has to work out their own salvation. Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. |
| Don Draper from Nantucket
User ID: 57553864 United States04/08/2021 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| <~>
User ID: 72134020 United States04/08/2021 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Corporal Punishment Blood levels may not be everything. I get that, in general, the blood level may be a good indicator. But is that all there is to the issue? For instance, does the rapidity of administration of a drug matter? Does your blood level shooting up to some level make a difference as compared to slowly being raised to that level? the point is, until it gets into the blood it's not ingested yet. your stomach contents are outside of the body. if it isn't absorbed into the blood, it's not doing anything yet. The point is it was slowly being absorbed raising over the 30 minutes he was interacting with police. Raising beyond his tolerance level. you think his tolerance level as in his required dose to overdose and die was half that of the average found with those stopped for a DUI and still driving? that's a really really long stretch you're going for there. It doesn’t matter. Multiple people have died with 11 ng/ml of fentanyl in their system.... |
