CNBC Youtube Channel. "Don't Make This Public" but Someone Did. The Truth Snuck Out.

Abstract

"Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown."

LINK: [link to www.nature.com (secure)]

“Speaking at a White House COVID-19 Response Team briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky noted, “Disinfection is only recommended in indoor settings, schools, and homes where there has been a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19 within the last 24 hours.”

Cleaning with products containing soap or detergent reduces germs on surfaces by removing contaminants and may also weaken or damage some of the virus particles, which decreases risk of infection from surfaces,” the CDC added in an update on its website. “When no people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 are known to have been in a space, cleaning once a day is usually enough to sufficiently remove virus that may be on surfaces and help maintain a healthy facility.”

People are still encouraged to clean with soap and water or detergent. While COVID can be spread through contaminated surfaces, the risk is low.

[link to fortune.com (secure)]

So asymptomatic spread isn't really a problem and it's a very low chance you can catch Covid from a contaminated surface.

The experts have told us over and over again that the masks are ineffective and can actually help to spread a virus.

There's not really any danger of asymptomatic spread at all.

Contaminated surfaces aren't likely to spread the disease.

But people still listen to the News and do what they are told.

Here's Fauci saying the face masks are a placebo. "They make you feel safe".

:bumpity:

Wuhan coronavirus: face masks 'do nothing' - virologist

Dr Chris Smith, consultant virologist at Cambridge University, told RNZ people should not buy them and instead save their money.

"Go and spend it on something useful that you enjoy doing, like having a beer. Those face masks are absolute rubbish and they do nothing."

However, he did say they had a placebo effect.

"They make you feel better, that you've done something, and they also have the effect of warning you to stay away from someone who's wearing one."

"The ones that you buy on the street that are cheap and nasty ... there are big gaps around the sides of your face and every time you cough and sneeze it just comes flying out the side.

"Also they dampen, so as you breathe they get damp and that dampness just makes a nice conduit through for the virus particles."

LINK: [link to www.rnz.co.nz (secure)]

(CNN) US Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams not only wants people to stop buying facemasks to prevent the novel coronavirus, but warns that you actually might increase your risk of infection if facemasks are not worn properly.

"You can increase your risk of getting it by wearing a mask if you are not a health care provider," Adams said during an interview on Fox & Friends on Monday morning.

"Folks who don't know how to wear them properly tend to touch their faces a lot and actually can increase the spread of coronavirus," Adams said.

"We're certainly seeing more spread in communities, but it's important for folks to know that right now their risk as American citizens remains low. There are things people can do to stay safe. There are things they shouldn't be doing and one of the things they shouldn't be doing in the general public is going out and buying masks," he said.

[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]

The masks aren't effective in controlling a virus pandemic. They can even increase the chance of it spreading.

They want you to be submissive so you'll take the vaccine and do whatever other nonsense they have planned down the road.

https://imgur.com/b0diXqk

From the Rockefellers back in 2010:

From page 19:

China’s government was not the only one that
took extreme measures to protect its citizens
from risk and exposure. During the pandemic,
national leaders around the world flexed their
authority and imposed airtight rules and
restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face
masks to body-temperature checks at the entries
to communal spaces like train stations and
supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded,
this more authoritarian control and oversight
of citizens and their activities stuck and even
intensified. In order to protect themselves from
the spread of increasingly global problems—from
pandemics and transnational terrorism to
environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders
around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world
gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens
willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and
their privacy—to more paternalistic states
in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for
top-down direction and oversight, and national
leaders had more latitude to impose order in the
ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this
heightened oversight took many forms: biometric
IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter
regulation of key industries whose stability
was deemed vital to national interests. In many
developed countries, enforced cooperation with a
suite of new regulations and agreements slowly
but steadily restored both order and, importantly,
economic growth.

LINK: [link to www.nommeraadio.ee (secure)]

That's what they are up to--and look how well it works to weed out higher intelligence humans--the ones who DON'T wear a mask while alone on the street or in their closed cars, alone.

I don't find this alarming because of my own personal experience.

I live alone and our governor started the shelter-in-place as soon as COVID reached the U.S. I never went anywhere and only saw one person (a friend who checks on me every day).

I had to take a COVID test prior to outpatient surgery and it came back positive. She and I both assumed that she gave it to me because I don't go anywhere. Literally, I left the house that Wednesday to go to a curbside testing center - that was my ONLY contact with the outside world.

Turns out her test came back negative. How in the hell is that even possible?

By the way, I never had any symptoms and didn't feel sick either. I still don't know how I contracted it but it does cast doubt on this being a real thing.

This whole pandemic charade is about increasing limits and restrictions on us so that we produce a smaller global footprint.

Abstract

"Government policies during the COVID-19 pandemic have drastically altered patterns of energy demand around the world. Many international borders were closed and populations were confined to their homes, which reduced transport and changed consumption patterns. Here we compile government policies and activity data to estimate the decrease in CO2 emissions during forced confinements. Daily global CO2 emissions decreased by –17% (–11 to –25% for ±1σ) by early April 2020 compared with the mean 2019 levels, just under half from changes in surface transport. At their peak, emissions in individual countries decreased by –26% on average. The impact on 2020 annual emissions depends on the duration of the confinement, with a low estimate of –4% (–2 to –7%) if prepandemic conditions return by mid-June, and a high estimate of –7% (–3 to –13%) if some restrictions remain worldwide until the end of 2020. Government actions and economic incentives postcrisis will likely influence the global CO2 emissions path for decades."

LINK: [link to www.nature.com (secure)]

These billionaires like Gates and the Rockefellers think they are saving the world by tricking us into submission.

But it's their technology and the "throw away" culture we live in that is causing so much of the massive pollution problems.

Why not design a computer and an operating system that will last 20 years without having to constantly buy a new one and throw the old tech away.

Such hypocrisy.

I'm using a computer from 2003 to write a book. No internet. No updates.

Remember when they were telling us that COVID could live for up to 8 days on surfaces and was highly contagious?

This whole thing is a big pile of bullshit lies and it is all coming out now.

They say that it spreads on money too so they can reset the economy with a universal crypto currency.

But what about everything else the masks do to the planet?
[link to weather.com (secure)]
[link to oceansasia.org (secure)]

Ironic, eh?

Truth is coming out

Asymptomatic spread of covid is a 100% made up lie.

Proof?

Cite me a peer reviewed study that proves this claim.

There are none!

The PCR test (especially when pumped up) "finds" all kinds of remnants that "could be" covid -- and lots that turn out to be various old flu strains. They are not isolating and finding covid, just ghosts that they say could be covid.

It's a junk test.

Just wear a mask idiot

The tests have a 50% false negative rate. More than 80% of people who have tested positive, have been “asymptomatic”. The vast majority of “asymptomatic” people aren’t bothering to get tested, for obvious reasons. We can, thus, conclude that the overwhelming majority of infections are “asymptomatic”. “Asymptomatic” is a CYA misnomer. People who test positive but don’t have flu-symptoms, mostly under 40s, are still dying from strokes, aneurysms, heart attacks, experiencing of blood and venal issues and accelerated organ failure. By pretending the primary presentation of CV19 is flu-like symptoms, leading to pneumonia, all of those other deaths from the “asymptomatic” infections get swept under the rug. Further, by suppressing flu-symptoms via the prophylactic gene therapies they’re erroneously calling vaccines, the infected are more likely to experience any array of the “asymptomatic” symptoms.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

We already know this months ago. It's a lot larger than 10 mill now.

Changed nothing then..

Of course.

But if the narrative isn't pushed that the disease can be spread heavily by asymptomatic hosts then how could they force so many to submit to their will?