Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,175 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,320,451
Pageviews Today: 2,190,407Threads Today: 838Posts Today: 14,969
09:27 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions

 
conservator
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 78786820
United States
03/21/2021 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions
We will start with this map: [link to commons.wikimedia.org (secure)]

Marsupials' habitat is not in Europe and Asia. When the Ark rested high up on Ararat in present-day Turkey and the animals were released, they had to adapt to each other. Many extinct animals/birds became extinct when man rediscovered land by boat or ship; introducing predators also. Let us back up; the earlier ships were much smaller after the flood because all of the technology has been destroyed (machining tools). So in the rediscovery of remote lands like Australia, the first visits were not extravagantly planned and mice among other small sneaking hijacking riders went with man to places where no land animals (except birds and sea life) and possibly little to no insects existed! Therefore, having the opportunity to develop different characteristics that while in the midst of it in generations would not survive predation.

Now North and South America were accessible I believe by ice from Russia to the United States as shown by a current ice map: [link to nsidc.org]
So predators eventually made it North America much sooner which could hinder the kangaroo development from mice but nevertheless it looks like marsupial development made it to a certain point with opossums.

Looking for some information on pouches, I was led to this interesting find on Wikipedia:
Mating generally happens between May and July. All males die soon after mating. Females give birth to about 6 young ones about 30 days after mating. Phascogales do not have the true pouch that is found in most other marsupials [1][2]. Instead, they form temporary folds of skin - sometimes called a "pseudo-pouch" [3] around the mammary glands during pregnancy. Young stay in this pseudo-pouch area, nursing for about 7 weeks before being moved to a nest where they stay until they are weaned at about 20 weeks of age. Females live for about 3 years, and generally produce one litter. Courtesy: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

This is interesting, temporary pouches for the young! So Phascogale and Mice look so closely related; the link between Marsupials and mice?

So to not have pouches develop until needed an energy saving characteristic product of micro-evolution? Maybe the Marsupials first and then mice? It looks that way that it may have been Phascogales that were riding early post flood boats. Or maybe mice and marsupials are two different kinds? But because due to the Phascogales, there is a link?

To me, it is obvious that we would not have the Kangaroo today if they had not had a few hundred years if not 1000's to micro-evolutionize in peace to what they are today.

Last Edited by conservator on 03/23/2021 06:25 PM
John 8:49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
8:50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.
8:51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
conservator  (OP)

User ID: 78786820
United States
03/22/2021 12:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions
Are the Koala Bear and the Kangaroo from the same mice and/or Phascogales? Certainly looks that way. The pouch openings are in different spots on both animals which is interesting, leading to that the pouch trait was something that mice lost if Phascogales and mice are of the same kind.
John 8:49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
8:50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.
8:51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
conservator  (OP)

User ID: 78786820
United States
03/22/2021 12:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions
Here is a Quokka, an animal that is smaller than a Wallaby but much bigger than a Phascogales.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

[link to upload.wikimedia.org (secure)]

Last Edited by conservator on 03/22/2021 12:34 AM
John 8:49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
8:50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.
8:51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
conservator  (OP)

User ID: 78786820
United States
04/03/2021 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions
Here is the Mouse Oppossum. No pouch but has the more usable tail that can also store fat. Much smaller than the Virginia Oppossum. Like the Phascogales, the Mouse Oppossum gives possible evidence that there may be links between mice and marsupials.




John 8:49 Jesus answered, I have not a devil; but I honour my Father, and ye do dishonour me.
8:50 And I seek not mine own glory: there is one that seeketh and judgeth.
8:51 Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80843416
United States
05/16/2022 12:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Are Marsupials and Mice of One Kind? If So, Did the Pouched Exist Before the Nonpouched? After the Flood Questions
bump





GLP