How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election

Apparently. Turns out it was Biden who dragged Obama into the endzone. Obama was holding him back the whole time. Who knew?

He's the most popular president in history in the fewest counties in history.

I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.

OP, great post !!! It reminded me of this:

NOTICE THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN OUR 2020 ELECTION AND ONE THE US STATE DEPARTMENT DECLARED FRAUDULENT:

Ukraine's Election: Next Steps
Ambassador John Tefft, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs
Testimony Before the House International Relations Committee
Washington, DC
December 7, 2004

The following are examples of the most egregious, widely observed and reported examples of election-day fraud on November 21:

Illegal Use of Absentee Ballots: According to the respected NGO "Committee of Voters of Ukraine" (CVU), massive electoral fraud was committed through the illegal use of absentee voter certificates. For example, people were caught in Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy oblasts with their pockets stuffed with blank absentee ballots that they were using to vote at multiple polling stations.

Opposition Observers Ejected: Observers from Our Ukraine and other opposition groups were expelled from most polling stations in eastern Ukraine on Election Day. For example, in Territorial Election Commission (TEC) district number 42 in Donetsk oblast, Our Ukraine observers were kicked out of all but a few polling stations.

North Korean-Style Turnout in the East: Turnout in the pro-Yanukovych eastern oblasts was unnaturally high. In several electoral districts, turnout for the run-off round increased by 30 to 40 percent over the first round. In Luhansk oblast, the reported turnout rate hit nearly 96 percent -- a number that, to quote the OSCE, even Stalinist North Korea would envy. A similar turnout rate was reported in Donetsk oblast, where 98 percent of the votes went to hometown candidate Prime Minister Yanukovych.

Mobile Ballot Box Fraud: In the second round of the election, the number of voters who supposedly cast ballots at home using mobile ballot boxes was double that of the first round. Much of this voting occurred without observers being present and was massively fraudulent. In Mykolayiv oblast, for example, nearly 35 percent of the oblast's voters purportedly cast their ballots "at home."

Computer Data Allegedly Altered To Favor Yanukovych: There were credible reports showing that that Yanukovych supporters gained illegal access to the Central Election Commission's computer system and illegally altered vote tabulation data being transmitted by TECs to the CEC.

Reports of Opposition Fraud: Yanykovych’s supporters allege that Yushchenko’s supporters stuffed ballot boxes in western Ukraine. But the reports and evidence of pro-Yanukovych fraud greatly outweighed those indicated for Yushchenko.

This massive ballot-box stuffing, fake turnout figures, and other forms of fraud and abuse allowed the authorities to create a victory for their candidate that almost certainly would not have been possible in a free and fair election. The final figures announced by the Central Election Commission (CEC) gave Prime Minister Yanukovych with 49.46 percent of the vote over opposition candidate Yushchenko with 46.61 percent. It is impossible to know what the real numbers were, but a large-scale (20,000 respondents), nation-wide anonymous exit poll conducted by a consortium of three highly respected research organizations (partially funded by the United States Government) projected Yushchenko the winner with 53 percent versus 44 percent for Yanukovych. Other exit polls and parallel vote counts indicated a Yushchenko victory, although by lesser amounts.

[link to 2001-2009.state.gov (secure)]

THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TURNED THE UNITED STATES INTO AN INTERNATIONAL JOKE.

truth is coming

OP, great post !!! It reminded me of this:

NOTICE THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN OUR 2020 ELECTION AND ONE THE US STATE DEPARTMENT DECLARED FRAUDULENT:

Ukraine's Election: Next Steps
Ambassador John Tefft, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs
Testimony Before the House International Relations Committee
Washington, DC
December 7, 2004

The following are examples of the most egregious, widely observed and reported examples of election-day fraud on November 21:

Illegal Use of Absentee Ballots: According to the respected NGO "Committee of Voters of Ukraine" (CVU), massive electoral fraud was committed through the illegal use of absentee voter certificates. For example, people were caught in Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy oblasts with their pockets stuffed with blank absentee ballots that they were using to vote at multiple polling stations.

Opposition Observers Ejected: Observers from Our Ukraine and other opposition groups were expelled from most polling stations in eastern Ukraine on Election Day. For example, in Territorial Election Commission (TEC) district number 42 in Donetsk oblast, Our Ukraine observers were kicked out of all but a few polling stations.

North Korean-Style Turnout in the East: Turnout in the pro-Yanukovych eastern oblasts was unnaturally high. In several electoral districts, turnout for the run-off round increased by 30 to 40 percent over the first round. In Luhansk oblast, the reported turnout rate hit nearly 96 percent -- a number that, to quote the OSCE, even Stalinist North Korea would envy. A similar turnout rate was reported in Donetsk oblast, where 98 percent of the votes went to hometown candidate Prime Minister Yanukovych.

Mobile Ballot Box Fraud: In the second round of the election, the number of voters who supposedly cast ballots at home using mobile ballot boxes was double that of the first round. Much of this voting occurred without observers being present and was massively fraudulent. In Mykolayiv oblast, for example, nearly 35 percent of the oblast's voters purportedly cast their ballots "at home."

Computer Data Allegedly Altered To Favor Yanukovych: There were credible reports showing that that Yanukovych supporters gained illegal access to the Central Election Commission's computer system and illegally altered vote tabulation data being transmitted by TECs to the CEC.

Reports of Opposition Fraud: Yanykovych’s supporters allege that Yushchenko’s supporters stuffed ballot boxes in western Ukraine. But the reports and evidence of pro-Yanukovych fraud greatly outweighed those indicated for Yushchenko.

This massive ballot-box stuffing, fake turnout figures, and other forms of fraud and abuse allowed the authorities to create a victory for their candidate that almost certainly would not have been possible in a free and fair election. The final figures announced by the Central Election Commission (CEC) gave Prime Minister Yanukovych with 49.46 percent of the vote over opposition candidate Yushchenko with 46.61 percent. It is impossible to know what the real numbers were, but a large-scale (20,000 respondents), nation-wide anonymous exit poll conducted by a consortium of three highly respected research organizations (partially funded by the United States Government) projected Yushchenko the winner with 53 percent versus 44 percent for Yanukovych. Other exit polls and parallel vote counts indicated a Yushchenko victory, although by lesser amounts.

[link to 2001-2009.state.gov (secure)]

THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TURNED THE UNITED STATES INTO AN INTERNATIONAL JOKE.

Still waiting