How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election

The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.

The facts dont lie. Video doesnt lie. Shredded ballots dont lie. Ballot dumps dont lie. Statistically impossible anomalies dont lie. Numbers changing on live TV dont lie. Fake signatures dont lie. Changing constitutional laws governing elections by non-legislatures doesnt lie.

The Demonrats do.

To indicate there was any other winner than Trump is denial in its most supreme form and a break from what is now a horrific reality that indeed this election was fraudulent through and through, period.

People know it was stolen, its not going away, and if the military wont dont anything, you can bet millions of people just might. The fortress around DC says all we need to know about our "government" and what they think they are, and what they think of us.

The facts dont lie. Video doesnt lie. Shredded ballots dont lie. Ballot dumps dont lie. Statistically impossible anomalies dont lie. Numbers changing on live TV dont lie. Fake signatures dont lie. Changing constitutional laws governing elections by non-legislatures doesnt lie.

The Demonrats do.

To indicate there was any other winner than Trump is denial in its most supreme form and a break from what is now a horrific reality that indeed this election was fraudulent through and through, period.

People know it was stolen, its not going away, and if the military wont dont anything, you can bet millions of people just might. The fortress around DC says all we need to know about our "government" and what they think they are, and what they think of us.

Wow, and all of the sudden the plan reveals itself to you 'nothin habbening", Eores...

Throw in a dash of 2018 EO, specifically designed to seal the deal with language stating that those cheating the vote, and with foreign influence are deemed (along with said foreign nation interferiering) enemy combatants, who's assets IN THE US shall be SEIZED.

"ACT OF WAR" - Q
"MATTERS OF NAT SEC" - Q

Allowed to CONNECT via IP to entrap ALL LOCAL AND STATE OFFICIALS' involvement across 2900 US counties, in THE largest international honeypot scheme in US (world?) hist.

"WE HAVE EVERYTHING" - Q
"NO ONE ESCAPES THIS" - Q

Where the core of our military, along with (no such agency), mil intel - ADOPTS JFK'S NAS57 memo ON NOV 18TH 2020 - where:

'The Defense Department started the process of elevating special operations forces on par with military departments' - excluding for the first time since its advent, the compromised agency of [C]lowns n [A]ction, [essentially BLINDING them] from ALL SPECOPS required to pull this off without leaks, or SUBVERSION.

www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2419154/special-​operations-leader-to-report-directly-to-acting-defense-secret​ary/

The timing?

"HOW MANY COINCIDENCES BEFORE MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE?" -Q

Meanwhile, the DHS cyber security detail CISA, headed by Kris Krebbs, along with other agencies, and previous to the election publicly announce that all elections ARE being monitored, and assure us by releasing a press video:

[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]

Where Kris is working with DHS's: [N]ational [C]ouncil of tatewide nteroperability [C]oordinators (NCSWIC)

"[N]othing [C]an top [W]hat s [C]oming" - Q

Unfortunately, Kris announces that CISA has found no widespread voting fraud.... so, naturally - TRUMP FIRES HIM, media goes wild.

BUT, Kris is later called to the senate to speak about this statement, and reveals that where his dept scope ENDS, THE MILITARY'S BEGINS [ACT OF WAR]

But Kris is bad, RIGHT? AND TRUMP HATE BAD MAN... RIGHT?

Wrong.

Watch the public video. What is on Kris's bookshelf, his reading collection??

The Art of War?, Book about a storm?

"THE STORM IS COMING" - Q
"HOW DO YOU DEFEAT A WILD ANIMAL? ATTACK FROM THE FRONT? ATTACK FROM BEHIND? (Art of war) - Q

No, you TRAP the motherfucker.

And Kris's firing?

Further....

Michael Flynn's firing?

Further....

Jeff Session's firing?

Further....

William Barr's firing?

Can an acting member of an admin be called as a witness in a GRAND JURY? What about as witness in a military council? Tribunal?

"Flynn knows where the bodies are buried"-Q
"Trust Sessions" -Q

"But that is all PAST TENSE, we were told to trust sessions, who RECUSED himself in Hillarys Russian collusion, dossier, and other crimes listed by the IG REPORT...

WHAT OTHER CRIMES HRC? WHAT ELSE DID IG FIND, MENTION IN THE REPORT? TRAFFICKING? HAITI?

And that's history anyways, riiiight??

DID YOU MUTHERFUCKERS SEE A TRIAL YET???

"CRIMES AGAINDT HUMANITY" [IG REPORT] - Q
"FUTURE PROVES PAST" - Q

That last one is a dooosy! Especially since "The Larp" stopped posting back in Nov....

Right???????

"When is a map a KEY?" -Q

NO, they didn't stop.

But good luck finding an anon who even bothered following instructions in creating the "KEY". THE KEY IS A CLOCK. With all dates wrapped around in a spiral [naval academy code], where seemingly random dates lineup specifically accross multiple, even MIRRORED planes. Where the clock starts on the date specified, AND WINDS INTO THE....

FUTURE.

Cryptic post about "EVERGREEN" in 2018? On that one day in 2019 talking about a "clog"? Or some day in 2020 where Q mentioned "blockade"?????

"WATCH THE WATER" -Q
"EVERGREEN" -Q
"WHEN DO YOU CALL A PLUMBER?" -Q
"DEFINE BLOCKADE"-Q

YOU MEAN, there's a PRESCRIBED WAY, DEFINED BY Q TO READ PAST POSTS.... INTO THE FUTURE?

"FUTURE PROVES PAST" -Q
"YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW"-Q

"No way...!! Some of the smartest people on GLP.... (oxymoron) have said Q is a psyop!!"

"Biden and company are toooo smart for all that!"

So smart that a GLPr could easily see through Q? Sure... tell yourself that.

"THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID" -Q
"GLPRS ARE STUPID" -ME

I’m all for a military coup , it could save most of our lives. We will be at war in 3-6 months tops

"But trump is a psyop!! Works with the cabal!"

Otherwise, why would he let this go on!!

"nothing is happening" -Glp

"why doesn't trump go arrest those mean old bad guys, huh??? He surely has a Keystone cop hat and a billyclub! A list of bad guys addresses?! DERP!" -Glp

"GAME THEORY" -Q
"SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO SHOW THE PUBLIC, YOU CANT JUST TELL THEM -Q

OK, THEN ..... WTF IS "Q"??

"THE LARGEST MILITARY INTEL EVER DROPPED TO THE PUBLIC IN US HISTORY" -Q
"NO MORE THAN 10 HAVE AN 80K FT VIEW, AND ONLY 3 NON-MILITARY" -Q

>>>>>>>>>>>

I watched the Q following worldwide drop from 30 million strong, to like 135k artists.

Why?

Because you people are dumbassess with no scope of breadth for the levels of world wide corruption.

Yet, with such a dwindling following, the MSM, even Maddow DAILY references anons as the most dangerous amongst you.... in fact, it's the "qanon" nut jobs running the AZ audit, remember? Who caused the "insurrection" at the capital.... remember? Cnn documentary painting us for you. HBO documentary for your little brains... yeah. OK.

"ALL OF THIS FOR A 'LARP' "? -Q
"WHEN DO YOU KNOW YOU ARE OVER THE TARGET?" -Q

I'll tell you, if you are in a bomber, it's WHEN YOU TAKE FLAK..... morAns.

20 yrs here.

Watching you asshats talk about flat earth and your haunted closets.

Yet, the biggest thing to happen on a CONSPIRACY SITE.... Q.....

TABOO?

Fuk me sideways.

4500+ posts....

How many did you read? Seriously.... ask yourself.

11.3
11.4

'ARREST HILLARY, FOLLOW HUMA'
"DIDNT COME TRUE IN 2017 !!"

How about common sense?

Trump has 400 rallies with 20,000 people in attendance each,
Biden can't even draw 12 people

I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.

I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.

I’m all for a military coup , it could save most of our lives. We will be at war in 3-6 months tops

I’m all for a military coup , it could save most of our lives. We will be at war in 3-6 months tops

THEY DELETED EVERYTHING!!
[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]

[link to imgur.com]

How about common sense?

Trump has 400 rallies with 20,000 people in attendance each,
Biden can't even draw 12 people