Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,153 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 648,939
Pageviews Today: 1,130,914Threads Today: 471Posts Today: 7,933
01:36 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election

 
Gypo O'Leary

User ID: 78510157
United States
03/19/2021 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
How about common sense?

Trump has 400 rallies with 20,000 people in attendance each,
Biden can't even draw 12 people
 Quoting: Scorched


^This. Trump had unbelievable enthusiasm. Obama had believable enthusiasm among black voters.

the idea that Joe Biden smoked Obama's turnout levels among blacks is obviously a fraud.

Here is a list of inside the beltway playes, Senators, or ex-senators:

Dukakis
Mondale
Dole
Gore
Kerry
McCain.
Romney
Hillary

Joe Biden is one of these people. Nobody is enthusiastic voting for these people. Joe Biden ran for President every year since 1988. Nobody in the Democrat party liked the guy.


Plus Trump carried Iowa, Ohio, Florida. Nobody wins them then loses - because they are demographic mirror of the country.

Trump won +10 in Congress in 2020.

And Milwaukee historically is similar to Cleveland in terms of black turnout. In 2020 Milwaukee had 90%. Cleveland had 51%.


And no White Democrat has ever gotten more than 58% black turnout. ever. until Biden...a guy that is not that popular with blacks.

It's all obvious bullshit.
A. Nonymous Coward
Dave Landis79

User ID: 64607506
Netherlands
03/19/2021 06:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum

Well, what is for sure is the fact that the man NEVER got 81 million votes. Thats enough proof
cool2
Shithead Tyrone Slothrop

User ID: 65942580
United States
03/19/2021 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Two more weeks. Not even kidding. Trump will be President by this summer. Arizona audits are already happening.
 Quoting: BiffTannenXD


I'd post a video "Dream On" by Aerosmith. States could audit and say the results were dead wrong. At this point I don't know if "overturn" is the proper word. What would happen? As a practical matter, I say nothing. At this point, it's too inconvenient. Just like Obama being ineligible. Technically everything he did would have to be reversed. Way too inconvenient.
I've gotten a lot of red for telling the truth and being right. Just sayin'
Jalayaja

User ID: 80113779
Australia
03/19/2021 06:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
The mere fact that they stopped counting in the middle of the night should give you a hint.
There was absolutely no reason to do that, other than stopping Trump from being declared winner that very night.
Depluribus Unum  (OP)

User ID: 77094552
United States
03/19/2021 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Two more weeks. Not even kidding. Trump will be President by this summer. Arizona audits are already happening.
 Quoting: BiffTannenXD


I'd post a video "Dream On" by Aerosmith. States could audit and say the results were dead wrong. At this point I don't know if "overturn" is the proper word. What would happen? As a practical matter, I say nothing. At this point, it's too inconvenient. Just like Obama being ineligible. Technically everything he did would have to be reversed. Way too inconvenient.
 Quoting: Shithead Tyrone Slothrop


"Overturn" was never the right word. It was just another element of MSM propaganda, implying that the Biden win reflected the will of the electorate, and that Trump was trying to overrule the will of the people through clerical technicalities.

The right word would have been something like "Rectify" or "Correct" the results of the election. The reported results were incorrect, because the fraud caused a result to be reported that wasn't what the electorate voted for.
From many, covfefe
InMyDreams

User ID: 80120923
United States
03/19/2021 07:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
When the deadhead tells the world that he doesn't need your votes to win I tend to pay attention.
The Nothing sisters, Null & Void.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77582571
United States
03/19/2021 07:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
And just like that here is a five star post. TY OP!
Deep State

User ID: 72193226
United States
03/19/2021 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum

hesright
St. Pete Traveler

User ID: 80146047
United States
03/19/2021 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
How about common sense?

Trump has 400 rallies with 20,000 people in attendance each,
Biden can't even draw 12 people
 Quoting: Scorched


Bingo.

We watched it real time.

Fraud in 2016 too. No way Hillary was that close.

The bitch couldn't talk or get people to attend her rallies. She freaked out because she couldnt believe Trump beat her by so much, more than how much the expected.

Also, notice how they didn't use Hillary during the campaign? Because her snatch is toxic. Period.

Last Edited by St. Pete Traveler on 03/19/2021 08:44 PM
American Poet

User ID: 72553432
United States
03/19/2021 09:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Two more weeks. Not even kidding. Trump will be President by this summer. Arizona audits are already happening.
 Quoting: BiffTannenXD


I'd post a video "Dream On" by Aerosmith. States could audit and say the results were dead wrong. At this point I don't know if "overturn" is the proper word. What would happen? As a practical matter, I say nothing. At this point, it's too inconvenient. Just like Obama being ineligible. Technically everything he did would have to be reversed. Way too inconvenient.
 Quoting: Shithead Tyrone Slothrop



Those that sacrifice liberty for the sake of convenience deserve neither.

justice
The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.
StellaBlue

User ID: 4104364
United States
03/19/2021 10:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
We can't since no corrupt court (all of them) would touch it. The only way we could be better sure is back to paper only or blockchain based off of SSN and PIN.

There is no 100% with anything though except death and taxes.
 Quoting: TawnyPortapottie


We can know, and we do. A court's refusal to hear the facts does not change the facts. Courts do not dictate reality. They just dictate whether and how damages will be remedied.

The foundation of our entire society lies in the trust that justice will be done, even to lawbreakers. People are told that crime is never excusable, even to prevent damages from other criminals on the basis that we can trust the justice system to remedy the damages. It's how they can claim that you must always obey police orders, even when they're unlawful.

All of that was proven false over the last few months. Now that we cannot rely on the judicial system to remedy damages, we must prevent damages from being incurred by any means necessary. Criminals act with impunity (and for profit). Absent a fair judicial system, crime always pays.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum


"Reality" is what they tell you, my friend.
 Quoting: StellaBlue


Only in fascist dystopias. Just because the government says Blacks is White, Up is Down and War is Peace does not make it true. It makes the government wrong and corrupt.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum


Last year I saw Chinese people dropping dead in the street from bat virus... it sure looked real, real enough to start a worldwide shitstorm of epic proportions

Turns out those videos were fake

I'm not saying shenanigans weren't going on but if they were using tactics in "the art of war" they are going to deceive you every which way, to keep you off balance

It may have looked stolen- I watched the returns start to flip as the evening got late, shady as all get out what happened next.

But that is how they wanted it to appear, to divide us further. It's always about divide and conquer. All of it was planned, every bit. Has been that way for decades.

And yes I agree governments are evil and corrupt.
It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man. -Psalm 118:8

No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper. -Isaiah 54:17

If I disappear from this forum, aliens didn't take me- Jesus did! Give your heart to him today!
Resister

User ID: 78829252
United States
03/19/2021 11:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
The 2020 "election" was intentional cooperative treason. All parties involved should be tried and sentenced for treason.
"God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always, well informed... If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty... Let them take arms... What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. " - Thomas Jefferson in 1787
Icebear

User ID: 19590118
United States
03/20/2021 08:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Demopoops have gotten away with this shit so far because too many people in positions from which they should have been able to stop it have been too compromised and/or too intimidated to act.

The analysis starts with the chief justice of the US supreme court, pedo/pervo John Roberts and his fellow pedo/pervo Breyer. That is, a total dickhead who'd been spending time down there on Epstein's Lolita island was making the call as to whether the most major fraud case was heard by the US supreme court.
'If the wankers do not now come to their senses and clean up their stupid act, they may anticipate a rain of ruin from the sky, the like of which has never been seen on this Earth,,,'
nutmeg

User ID: 76388104
United States
05/13/2021 01:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
How about common sense?

Trump has 400 rallies with 20,000 people in attendance each,
Biden can't even draw 12 people
 Quoting: Scorched


Last Edited by nutmeg on 05/13/2021 01:38 AM
Depluribus Unum  (OP)

User ID: 79652979
United States
05/13/2021 01:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Whoa, thanks for the PINE.

pine

A good reminder that there is enough objective evidence to be 100% sure that fraud flipped the election result.
From many, covfefe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 66285793
Netherlands
05/13/2021 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
You can start with the premise that all elections are riddled with fraud and work your way up from there if it enough to sway an election.
Depluribus Unum  (OP)

User ID: 79652979
United States
05/13/2021 01:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
You can start with the premise that all elections are riddled with fraud and work your way up from there if it enough to sway an election.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 66285793


That's the whole point of this thread - to point out the fact that the absurd numbers (e.g. winning the popular vote by 6 million, but the electoral college by less than 50k) in key counties with evidence of illegal activity (i.e. witness affadavits, photographic and video evidence) is more than enough to throw the margin of victory into question.

Ignoring the evidence, as SCOTUS did, does not refute the evidence. The evidence is in fact irrefutable.
From many, covfefe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35738720
United States
05/13/2021 01:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum



What did we learn today folks?





THE US GOVERNMENT





IS 3rd WORLD F'ing CORRUPT!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35738720
United States
05/13/2021 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum



What did we learn today folks?





THE US GOVERNMENT





IS 3rd WORLD F'ing CORRUPT!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35738720




LOL


Never Forget;

There is MORE PROOF of Voter Fraud in 2020

THEN THERE EVER WAS OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION!


That should really tell the tale!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
It would be unusual for a county to change it's way of voting since 1914. Biden propped up the usurper for eight years so now it ended here.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Trump was hated by a lot of people but I doubt it was that much. He had a lot of enthusiastic people and he still got nearly half the votes. All those postal votes had to make it suspect.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
He thought Hillary had it in the bag which she did at first. He was bounced into it this time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Trump was helped with with the Burning Woman's help so I can't feel sorry for him. Also he rode in on the Usurper and gave him a free pass at the end to get his tax cuts.
Depluribus Unum  (OP)

User ID: 79652979
United States
05/13/2021 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Trump was hated by a lot of people but I doubt it was that much. He had a lot of enthusiastic people and he still got nearly half the votes. All those postal votes had to make it suspect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80353269


He was hated by the establishment, but loved by the American people. That was the recipe to force the fraudsters to expose themselves - threaten an outcome so horrible for them that they would rather be outed than accept it.

And here we are. The fraud is out in the open, and the Romneys and Cheneys of the world have made their allegiences known. Now the only remaining question is, will the fraud be allowed to stand and effectively end this nation of laws passed with the consent of the governed, or will the traitors be brought to justice?

It's not looking good for America right now, that's for sure.
From many, covfefe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
He used Obama as a platform then gave him a free pass.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80353269
United Kingdom
05/13/2021 01:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Trump was hated by a lot of people but I doubt it was that much. He had a lot of enthusiastic people and he still got nearly half the votes. All those postal votes had to make it suspect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80353269


He was hated by the establishment, but loved by the American people. That was the recipe to force the fraudsters to expose themselves - threaten an outcome so horrible for them that they would rather be outed than accept it.

And here we are. The fraud is out in the open, and the Romneys and Cheneys of the world have made their allegiences known. Now the only remaining question is, will the fraud be allowed to stand and effectively end this nation of laws passed with the consent of the governed, or will the traitors be brought to justice?

It's not looking good for America right now, that's for sure.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum


No he was also hated by a lot of people. He lost a lot of support when he got Coronavirus. He went down 20 points. Never recovered.
Depluribus Unum  (OP)

User ID: 79652979
United States
05/13/2021 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
Trump was hated by a lot of people but I doubt it was that much. He had a lot of enthusiastic people and he still got nearly half the votes. All those postal votes had to make it suspect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80353269


He was hated by the establishment, but loved by the American people. That was the recipe to force the fraudsters to expose themselves - threaten an outcome so horrible for them that they would rather be outed than accept it.

And here we are. The fraud is out in the open, and the Romneys and Cheneys of the world have made their allegiences known. Now the only remaining question is, will the fraud be allowed to stand and effectively end this nation of laws passed with the consent of the governed, or will the traitors be brought to justice?

It's not looking good for America right now, that's for sure.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum


No he was also hated by a lot of people. He lost a lot of support when he got Coronavirus. He went down 20 points. Never recovered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80353269


You mean the Twitter mob? No matter how loud they are, they still only get one (legal) vote. Trump's silent (or silenced) majority support far exceeded the vocal minority. That's why they had to engage in such extensive fraud to flip the result.
From many, covfefe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79799833
United States
05/13/2021 01:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE Biden Lost


[link to hereistheevidence.com (secure)]
TheExPatrioticGirl

User ID: 80276344
United States
05/13/2021 02:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
How about simple common sense? Biden didn't even campaign. In fact, he had to cancel the entire last leg of the tour because no one was showing up (while Trump was packing the house in the tens of thousands). How does that stack up to a guy supposedly getting 80 MILLION VOTES??? It simply doesn't.

Problem is there was SO much fraud that they couldn't possibly get an accurate tally for either dude right now even if they wanted to. There were so many fake addresses and dead people voting, it was ridiculous. Steven Crowder proved this by spending two weeks on the road with his crew physically visiting a sample of 1000 of the NEW addresses pre-election from the Georgia voter registration website and filming the vacant lots and missing house numbers and fake street names as they cross-referenced from their list. Live on air he called and confronted both a Georgia city councilman AND a democrat Georgia official, explaining what he had found, giving examples, and completely putting both guys on the spot. Both said that they would "look into it" and two days after these calls, Crowder's YouTube channel was taken down for two weeks for spreading "false information about the election".

I mean, come on! And besides that, I live in Arizona and because of a 13-year side job in the auction business, I know a lot of people and nobody I ever even ran into had any intention of voting for Biden. This state is filled with people who love their guns and for that reason alone, Biden was a no-go. There were two rallies in one day last October on a Monday work day, one in Phoenix that pulled in 30K people and one three hours later in Tucson that pulled in 20K. The week before the Phoenix rally, Joe Biden and Harris held a rally in Phoenix AND LESS THAN 100 PEOPLE SHOWED UP!! And one week after Trump's stint in AZ, the people of AZ held their own rally, lining the side of the highway for NINETY-SIX MILES with cars end to end from Tucson to Phoenix. BIDEN DID NOT WIN IN ARIZONA!

That plus everything OP listed is evidence enough.

Last Edited by TheExPatrioticGirl on 05/13/2021 02:59 AM
It's all fun & games until the Dogman stands up

Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy Shit! What a ride!"

In times of trouble, I ask myself, "What would Sarah Conner do?"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73417157
United States
05/13/2021 02:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election
I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.
 Quoting: Depluribus Unum


THEY DELETED EVERYTHING!!
[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]

[link to imgur.com]





GLP