How we can be 100% sure that fraud changed the result of the 2020 election

I posted this in another thread, but some people still seem to think that there isn't overwhelming proof that fraud changed the outcome. Here is a rundown of the objective, undeniable, universally accepted facts.

The recipe for proof of fraud consists of a few ingredients:

1. Absurd numbers, with Joe underperforming everywhere except precisely the counties he needed to in order to win key swing states

2. Witness affadavits swearing to misconduct in the counties with absurd numbers.

3. Unlawful handling and documention, resulting in a complete inability to trace or audit results in the counties with absurd numbers. For the ballots in question, there are no chain of custody records, inspectors were not present, and system logs have been deleted.

Now, on to the details:

Joe Biden supposedly received the most popular votes in history (15% higher than the most Obama ever got), yet won the fewest counties of any winning candidate ever. This directly indicates that all votes were concentrated in just a handful of counties.

Several of the very few counties he won were in key swing states. These include Detoit, Atlanta, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and a few others.

Despite getting the most votes of any candidate in history, the electoral college votes hinged on less than 40,000 (Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin would have flipped the election).

Now all of this is not proof of misconduct - there are laws mandating inspections, handling, chain of custody records and system logs to resolve these sorts of questions. All we need to do is check the records to make sure everything is above board, right?

Well as it turns out, the chain of custody records and system logs in many of these counties were unlawfully deleted, if they were ever created in the first place. Additionally, according to hundreds of affadavits across several states, millions of mail in ballots, far exceeding the margin of victory, were processed unlawfully in the absence of constitutionally mandated inspectors. As a result, millions of mail in votes are impossible to trace back to a real person, meaning they could theoretically have all been cast by a single individual. We have no way of knowing how many people even voted, let alone who they voted for.

As if this wasn't bad enough, we also know that in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan, the governor and secretary of state unconstitutionally changed voting laws on the fly with no congressional approval. This invalidates the ballots that were received outside of the timeframe legally allowed.

In summary, the numbers are clearly absurd, they're impossible to audit due to systemic violations of law which were consistent across state lines, and the elections officials are being completely uncooperative - to the point of ignoring supreme court orders in Pennsylvania and ignoring Senate subpoenas in Arizona.

There is no way any honest person could claim this election was free from fraud, and that the results can be certified with any confidence.

There is "concrete, touchable, printable proof" that laws were violated, invalidating a number of votes far exceeding the margin of victory. That, combined with the clearly abberant numbers in these counties and the absurd results on a national scale, proves that the results could not have been honestly certified.

Courts dismissing cases on "standing" and "laches" does not refute the overwhelming proof provided by the facts. The facts of the case stand unrefuted, because they are irrefutable.