Qanon was the perfect psyop to destroy the credibility of legitimate conspiracy researchers

The best conspiracy researchers called it BS all along.

Ever read Miles Mathis?

Or my years of posts on GLP?

haha not destroyed, validated.

Just a bunch blessed with slow uptake, trying to make up for the own ignorance and stupidity!

You need to share about all those golden times here at our special electronic country club.

OP lay off the meds. People like you who are obsessed with attacking Q, are actually more disturbed than Qtards.

The only thing wrong with Q is the predictions. Other stuff, like the charge that elites are trafficking kids, is not something anyone should be so against when there is so much of it infesting this world. Unless of course, if you are actually involved in it.

Qanon was the most blatantly banausic 'conspiracy theory' most have ever seen in their lives. Not even 'flat earth' compares.

So, what's the difference between 'Q' and actual conspiracy researchers, you ask? Intelligence, Reading, Verifying, and Confirming.

See, what Qtards failed to understand is, actual researchers simply won't bother with Haiku poems written by an anonymous posters on a troll message board - one for teens and memeporn. Nor would actual researchers attempt to dissect specious blurbs engaged in tautology and ego stroking.

Those that 'believed' in Q, were those looking for meaning in a short series of beclouded messages, that could be chopped into 10,000 different contexts. Which,in their minds, 'proved' 10,000 different meanings in as many contexts.

These messages stroked the ego of the befuddled. They were a comfort pillow for the foolhardy.

Actual research doesn't work this way. Yes, smart people know this.

How did they pull it up? Simple. QAnon used the oldest trope of all, mystery fiction. A mysterious stranger shows up and drops a strange clue leading to long-hidden secrets which his clues, and only your detecting power, can reveal, which leads you to new clues.

This methodology utilizes the ultimate in Dunning Kruger, with a hint of Sherlock Holmes. Since Qanon tells people only the 'smart' (people who are in reality, anything but) would follow him, it gives followers a much needed ego boost, as their sorry lives receive very little by way of accolade.

At the same time, such postering forces unexposed normies to associate actual intelligent researchers, e.g. those who are exposing corruption and peculation, with the stupidity and intellectual vacuity of Qanon.

So, thanks Qtards. We had a chance. We really did. It was so blatant a child would have believed the evidence if properly presented.

But no, you couldn't play smart. You blew it.

So thanks Qtards, you ruined it. For all of us.

Why are you still beating this drum? Move on.

You literally came here, stirred the hornets nest, then complain about it.

Loser.

The storm is coming

Brewing in the darkness

Beyond the stones?

No! Into the clearance zone.

Up and over they will go.


See, I wrote a stupid 'Q' Haiku. Now you can look at it in 500,000 different ways and claim you're smart by decoding it like Nostradumbass.

Qanon was the most blatantly banausic 'conspiracy theory' most have ever seen in their lives. Not even 'flat earth' compares.

So, what's the difference between 'Q' and actual conspiracy researchers, you ask? Intelligence, Reading, Verifying, and Confirming.

See, what Qtards failed to understand is, actual researchers simply won't bother with Haiku poems written by an anonymous posters on a troll message board - one for teens and memeporn. Nor would actual researchers attempt to dissect specious blurbs engaged in tautology and ego stroking.

Those that 'believed' in Q, were those looking for meaning in a short series of beclouded messages, that could be chopped into 10,000 different contexts. Which,in their minds, 'proved' 10,000 different meanings in as many contexts.

These messages stroked the ego of the befuddled. They were a comfort pillow for the foolhardy.

Actual research doesn't work this way. Yes, smart people know this.

How did they pull it up? Simple. QAnon used the oldest trope of all, mystery fiction. A mysterious stranger shows up and drops a strange clue leading to long-hidden secrets which his clues, and only your detecting power, can reveal, which leads you to new clues.

This methodology utilizes the ultimate in Dunning Kruger, with a hint of Sherlock Holmes. Since Qanon tells people only the 'smart' (people who are in reality, anything but) would follow him, it gives followers a much needed ego boost, as their sorry lives receive very little by way of accolade.

At the same time, such postering forces unexposed normies to associate actual intelligent researchers, e.g. those who are exposing corruption and peculation, with the stupidity and intellectual vacuity of Qanon.

So, thanks Qtards. We had a chance. We really did. It was so blatant a child would have believed the evidence if properly presented.

But no, you couldn't play smart. You blew it.

So thanks Qtards, you ruined it. For all of us.

OP lay off the meds. People like you who are obsessed with attacking Q, are actually more disturbed than Qtards.

The only thing wrong with Q is the predictions. Other stuff, like the charge that elites are trafficking kids, is not something anyone should be so against when there is so much of it infesting this world. Unless of course, if you are actually involved in it.

Conspiracy theorists have always been labeled nut jobs. That wasnt going to change any time soon, Q or no Q. Live with it, deal with it...or move the fuck on.

Qanon was the most blatantly banausic 'conspiracy theory' most have ever seen in their lives. Not even 'flat earth' compares.

So, what's the difference between 'Q' and actual conspiracy researchers, you ask? Intelligence, Reading, Verifying, and Confirming.

See, what Qtards failed to understand is, actual researchers simply won't bother with Haiku poems written by an anonymous posters on a troll message board - one for teens and memeporn. Nor would actual researchers attempt to dissect specious blurbs engaged in tautology and ego stroking.

Those that 'believed' in Q, were those looking for meaning in a short series of beclouded messages, that could be chopped into 10,000 different contexts. Which,in their minds, 'proved' 10,000 different meanings in as many contexts.

These messages stroked the ego of the befuddled. They were a comfort pillow for the foolhardy.

Actual research doesn't work this way. Yes, smart people know this.

How did they pull it up? Simple. QAnon used the oldest trope of all, mystery fiction. A mysterious stranger shows up and drops a strange clue leading to long-hidden secrets which his clues, and only your detecting power, can reveal, which leads you to new clues.

This methodology utilizes the ultimate in Dunning Kruger, with a hint of Sherlock Holmes. Since Qanon tells people only the 'smart' (people who are in reality, anything but) would follow him, it gives followers a much needed ego boost, as their sorry lives receive very little by way of accolade.

At the same time, such postering forces unexposed normies to associate actual intelligent researchers, e.g. those who are exposing corruption and peculation, with the stupidity and intellectual vacuity of Qanon.

So, thanks Qtards. We had a chance. We really did. It was so blatant a child would have believed the evidence if properly presented.

But no, you couldn't play smart. You blew it.

So thanks Qtards, you ruined it. For all of us.

It must be difficult for the believers to live such a lie. As they've adopted a new set of blatant falsehoods the programming from their childhood must be very strong. See, the average Q believer must have had a very abusive childhood, perhaps alcoholic parents. Only such a traumatic incidence could cause such a schizophrenic break within the mind, allowing it to absorb such information and misinterpret as reality.

Qanon was the most blatantly banausic 'conspiracy theory' most have ever seen in their lives. Not even 'flat earth' compares.

So, what's the difference between 'Q' and actual conspiracy researchers, you ask? Intelligence, Reading, Verifying, and Confirming.

See, what Qtards failed to understand is, actual researchers simply won't bother with Haiku poems written by an anonymous posters on a troll message board - one for teens and memeporn. Nor would actual researchers attempt to dissect specious blurbs engaged in tautology and ego stroking.

Those that 'believed' in Q, were those looking for meaning in a short series of beclouded messages, that could be chopped into 10,000 different contexts. Which,in their minds, 'proved' 10,000 different meanings in as many contexts.

These messages stroked the ego of the befuddled. They were a comfort pillow for the foolhardy.

Actual research doesn't work this way. Yes, smart people know this.

How did they pull it up? Simple. QAnon used the oldest trope of all, mystery fiction. A mysterious stranger shows up and drops a strange clue leading to long-hidden secrets which his clues, and only your detecting power, can reveal, which leads you to new clues.

This methodology utilizes the ultimate in Dunning Kruger, with a hint of Sherlock Holmes. Since Qanon tells people only the 'smart' (people who are in reality, anything but) would follow him, it gives followers a much needed ego boost, as their sorry lives receive very little by way of accolade.

At the same time, such postering forces unexposed normies to associate actual intelligent researchers, e.g. those who are exposing corruption and peculation, with the stupidity and intellectual vacuity of Qanon.

So, thanks Qtards. We had a chance. We really did. It was so blatant a child would have believed the evidence if properly presented.

But no, you couldn't play smart. You blew it.

So thanks Qtards, you ruined it. For all of us.

Well, I agree, the Q "movement" was ridiculous from the start because it was all centered around "riddles" and trying to figure them out despite the fact that there was plenty of research available with no riddles attached. 500k+ lazy Q followers just wasting their time.

That being said, I'm not sure what's worse...being in a "movement" whose "leader" is an anonymous "riddler" or blaming that "movement" on the reason the opposition, the supposed researchers, didn't get the type of attention (and result) that they wanted. Apparently, truth doesn't prevail.

I also don't see how anyone can claim to be "awake" while still believing we live on a spinning ball. How is believing we live on a spinning ball hurtling through space any less ridiculous than believing that the answer to the world's problems is hidden in some Haiku poems? Sounds comparable to me.