Can Someone Show Me Historical Evidence That Jesus Ever Existed? I'll Wait Here Thanks.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

You have not understood the Bible and the words of Jesus.

The moment you stop wanting to be God yourself and give the person back to God - who always belonged to Him anyway - you are of course also immediately rid of "your" sins.

The problem is that you are not irrelevant to yourself at all, if it would be different, you would be a Christian and not a Satanist.

There are no archeological footprints left by Jesus , however the same can literally be said by every living person alive 2000 years ago, so if this is your gripe it is fairly non specific ... that being said several historians ( non Christian, and seemingly unbiased write about Him . The earliest appearing some thirty years after his death. They all agree in the manner of his death and why it occurred. There is little reason to doubt the basic accuracy of these details. For example Tacitus always footnotes a writing that is questionable or in doubt, but his writings on Jesus are presented rather matter of factory, and if anything he was biased against early christians

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Factory= factly

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]







[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

The Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty
Presenting the basic case for the non-existence of an historical Jesus
and a different origin of Christianity.
[link to www.jesuspuzzle.com (secure)]

Not long after Jesus's resurrection, he sent his brother Thomas to spread the Gospel in India.

There is record in India of him landing in "Muziris (Cranganore) on the Kerala coast in AD 52". He established a church there but was eventually killed by some Brahman priests. The entire episode of him landing there and establishing his church has been recorded by people in that area since those times. There remain today a large Christian population there.

The Gospel of Thomas was not included in the Bible but was later found in some of the oldest discovered Christian writings - The Coptic scrolls found in Nag Hammadi, Egypt.

Your tone says you are holding yourself up as prideful judge. This would be casting pearls before swine. There is a time coming with your life will depend on whether you know Jesus or not. Let's talk then.

In terms of content, it looks more like Jesus himself, until he appeared on the scene at 32, was himself traveling in the region and then reinterpreted what he had learned there in J#wish narrative terms.

For example, it is a typical myth to be able to walk on water, which belongs to the siddhis, the metaphysical abilities, for yogis. The counterpart, which is missing here, is to be able to dive into solid ground...

As true as that i can prove lineage to Charlemagne and I am his descendant. Depicted in stories does not mean its true or proof...

The truth is evident by the hatred carried by his heritage, legacy, the Israelites

Hard to acccept the duality of a destroyer, savior?

Tough love

[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

According to Scripture Jesus is God in the flesh. Adam is the son of God. Search the ancient languages and you will find this is what 'son' means.

Nobody. Nobody is judging you, that is only a fantasy in your head. Everything that happens happens by chance. No bigger sense involved. And when you die, it's over. Black nothingness.

No we cannot. It is impossible to convince you, even if you saw Him rise from the dead.

Luke.16
[30] And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
[31] And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

No.

If there was evidence there would be no need to have faith.

If you do not accept Biblical sources then the historian Tacitus wrote about Jesus as he was alive at the same time.

Tacitus born 56 AD, died 120 AD

Other than one non biblical mention that Jesus may have been, zero. The bible is the only one and those are unproven claims.

Other than 1 mention by 1 historian of reports of jesus, there ars none. The bible makes hundreds of supernatural claims, none proven but believed by many.

There is a invisible,undetectable unicorn living in my nose, disprove it! The claims of the bible require proof, not decliaing befief. I dont believe in bigfoot, now do I have to prove that? NO!They must bigfoot is. Until then its jusg another claim. This applies to all gods not just yours. Why is this hard to understand? There maybe god(s) or unicorns, just have seen any good evidence. Im not sleeping, satan or whatever. Show me good evidence, thats all. 2000 years and nothing. The same is true of the monkey god or any or them.

Check out Lee Stroebel’s “Case for Christ”. It is filled with evidence if you are actually interested, and not just trolling. There is too much evidence for a GLP post IMO.

Outside the bible, Im aware of only one. His being alive at one time is kinda unimportant. Its the son of god part. Lots of males have made the same claim but didnt catch on. That some male was alive and had a following is not news. Its always the supernatural claims that kill it.

not today Biden voter.