BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! | |
Hamburgerwagon
User ID: 66523962 United States 01/16/2021 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. Lee
User ID: 76960069 United States 01/16/2021 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. Lee
User ID: 76960069 United States 01/16/2021 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! |
Mr. Lee
User ID: 76960069 United States 01/16/2021 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! |
TOTAL WAR User ID: 79921317 Finland 01/16/2021 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! Iran is a fake boogie man, the globalists control Iran and if Iran attacks anyone or Starts on anyone, its because they made it happen. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43594769 The Iranians are in full blown plandemic with their masks, for a country supposedly not in the globalist fold Everything we get shown is completely artificial How do we know that they were Iranian missiles? How do we know that they were launched from Iran? What source ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77389109 United States 01/16/2021 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! JUST IN - Iranian ballistic missiles splashdown & explode dangerously close to a commercial ship and 100 miles from the Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group after a surprise drill exercise. Quoting: NOFAKE https://twitter.com/_/status/1350491604205899776 $50 says most tards on here will be like how dare they attack so close to the US when in reality its the carrier group parked right outside iran. same for when they say, US and russian fighters nearly collided after a breach of airspace, they make it out to sound like its right outside of the US's airspace but again in reality it will be somewhere over the black sea (for example) thousands of miles away from murica |
CUB4DK
User ID: 79555114 Canada 01/16/2021 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! MURDER of Innocence will be the charge, for these type of COCK SUCKERS,as these DEPLORABLE's can take that info to their Mother Fucking BANKS! Best Regards, Dr. Cannabis REX CUB4DK |
Lightning Chakra
User ID: 77201607 United States 01/16/2021 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! As I've said before in other threads...Iran is being primed to be the scapegoat for a major False Flag event to give the excuse for war. There's no other way for TPTB to get the vaccine rolling out as mandatory for all of us and passing laws which restrict our rights as well. "People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define "reality". But what does it mean to be "correct" or "true"? Merely vague concepts ... their "reality" may all be a mirage. Can we consider them to simply be living in their own world, shaped by their beliefs?" "People cling to all they know and understand. But understanding and knowledge are ambiguous. Their reality could all be an illusion." |
TheKeyling User ID: 77228582 New Zealand 01/16/2021 06:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79138141 Germany 01/16/2021 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! All predicted by a remote viewer in another thread: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79530913 Thread: Remote viewers seeing an attack in January? President address aboard AF1? There is no such thing as coincidence, or remote viewing. So, either it was pre-planned to post that thread as a psyop or it was simply an educated guess. Either way a blind man would have seen this coming. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77013778 01/16/2021 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78236916 Estonia 01/16/2021 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Iranian missiles land within 20 miles of commercial ship, 100 miles from Nimitz strike group in Indian Ocean!!! The Military industrial complex fabricates lies about Iran It’s not like Gen. McKenzie tells the IDF what to do—they tell him how to perform on the political stage. January 15, 2021 Gareth Porter has done it again. He has recently written an important article about how the war profiteers and much of the military industrial complex in the United States have summoned lies and complete fabrications about Iran. Why? According to Porter, some of those people just want to advance their financial and political power. General Kenneth McKenzie is a classic example. He has been meeting with the Israel Defense Forces since the beginning of time.[1] It’s not like Gen. McKenzie tells the IDF what to do—they tell him how to perform on the political stage. When it comes to Iran, Gen. McKenzie has obviously been reading the Israeli script. I don’t believe Biden will agree with the Israeli script on Iran, and we’ll just have to withhold judgement and see how this will play out in the next two to four years or so. But Porter’s article is a great read. How CENTCOM Chief McKenzie manufactured an Iran crisis to increase his power By Gareth Porter During the final two months of the Trump administration, a series of provocative U.S. military moves in the Middle East stirred fears that a war against Iran was being hatched. The atmosphere of crisis was not the result of any threat posed by Tehran, but rather the product of a campaign manufactured by the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM), Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., to advance his interests. In a bid for prestige and power within the military, and the influence over policymaking that it guarantees, McKenzie has worked to accumulate military assets. The general’s thirst for influence has been a driving factor in the latest episode of US-Iran tensions. To advance his self-serving agenda, McKenzie has deployed a calculated series of political-bureaucratic moves, combined with a PR push in the media. A four-star general who previously served as director of the Joint Staff at the Pentagon, McKenzie is regarded as the most politically astute commander ever to lead Middle East Command, according to journalist Mark Perry. He has also shown himself to be exceptionally brazen in scheming to defend his interests. Almost immediately after taking command at CENTCOM in March 2019, McKenzie launched his campaign of political manipulation. By requesting additional forces to contain a supposedly urgent Iranian threat, McKenzie triggered the dispatch of an aircraft carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East. A month later, he told reporters he believed the deployments were “having a very good stabilizing effect,” and that he was in the process of negotiating on a larger, long-term U.S. military presence. As a result of his maneuvering, McKenzie succeeded in acquiring 10,000 to 15,000 more military personnel, bringing the total in his CENTCOM realm to more than 90,000. The rapid increase in assets under his command was revealed in a Senate hearing in March 2020. During the remainder of 2020 some of those troops were shifted to East Asia or Europe, in line with the new Pentagon priority on “major power competition.” McKenzie’s determination to resist the loss of military assets was a crucial factor in artificially manufacturing the recent Iran crisis. McKenzie has fought to keep thousands of U.S. troops in Iraq, ostensibly to fight ISIS, but more fundamentally to maintain a long-term military presence in the country. But the U.S. military presence has been extremely unpopular in Iraq. In January 2020, following the U.S. assassination of Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, Iraq’s legislature passed a resolution demanding the withdrawal of all U.S. troops from the country. In the meantime, Iraqi militias aligned with Iran have escalated attacks on U.S. forces, beginning with a major rocket attack on coalition forces at Camp Taji in March 2020 that killed two U.S. servicemen. McKenzie exploited the Camp Taji attack to reclaim some of the assets he had lost, successfully requesting that a second aircraft carrier strike group remain in the region. McKenzie asked for the additional forces, according to the Wall Street Journal, to “signal to Tehran that it would be held responsible” if the Iraqi militias continued to attack U.S. forces. But that ploy was quickly shown to be a failure: Iraqi militia attacks on bases occupied by U.S. forces soared to 28 between March and August 2020. McKenzie was thus forced to begin withdrawing from bases in Iraq and turning them over to Iraqi forces. In September, McKenzie even acknowledged, while announcing the planned reduction of U.S. troops in Iraq from 5,200 to 3,000, that militia attacks were a major reason for the withdrawal. After Trump’s mid-November decision to reduce troop numbers in Afghanistan and Iraq to 2,500, McKenzie and his allies in Washington constructed the illusion of a crisis with Iran by promoting the idea that Iran might be planning attacks on U.S. forces. The New York Times reported on November 16 that officials were “especially nervous about the January 3 anniversary of the U.S. strike that killed Soleimani….” And a Washington Post story the following day cited “people familiar with the matter” stating that U.S. intelligence had recently been “monitoring potential threats by Iran to U.S. forces in the region”. Then came an even more serious move: on November 21, two Air Force “Stratofortress” B-52 bombers flew directly from the United States to the Persian Gulf. The flight was announced in a statement by the spokesman for McKenzie’s Central Command, which offered no specific justification. It declared that the Soleimani assassination in January 2020 precipitated the last deployment of long-range B-52 flights to the Gulf, creating the sense that the new flights were linked to a potential military crisis. In fact, the bombers made a round-trip from their U.S. base to the Gulf and back without stopping. On December 7, McKenzie was back on the PR offensive, speaking to a small group of reporters who were allowed to identify him only as a “senior U.S. military official with knowledge of the region.” As the Associated Press and NBC News reported, he said the risk of miscalculation by Iran “is higher…right now,” because of the U.S. pulling troops out of the region, the U.S. presidential transition, the COVID pandemic, and the anniversary of Soleimani killing. He emphasized that military leaders had determined that the Nimitz must remain in the region “for some time to come,” and that an additional fighter jet squadron might also be needed. Three days later, another squadron of B-52s flew from the U.S. to the Persian Gulf, flying provocatively close to Iranian airspace before returning to their home base. Then, on December 21, the U.S. Navy publicly announced that the guided-missile submarine USS Georgia, along with two guided-missile cruisers, had just transited the Strait of Hormuz and entered the Arabian Gulf. The announcement was highly unusual: the Navy, normally tight-lipped about the movements of its ships, stated publicly that the Georgia could carry up to 154 Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles. In an interview with ABC News on December 22, McKenzie was asked about the risk of an Iranian attack on US and allies in the region. “I do believe we remain in a period of heightened risk,” he said, even though he also suggested that Iran did not want war with the United States. A third flight of B-52s was dispatched to the Persian Gulf on December 30. This time, CENTCOM quoted McKenzie directly: his intention was to “make clear that we are ready and able to respond to any aggression directed at Americans or our interests.” A “senior military officer” subsequently told the Associated Press that U.S. intelligence had supposedly detected “indications that advanced weaponry has been flowing from Iran into Iraq recently and that Shiite militia leaders in Iraq may have met with officers of Iran’s Quds force.” This was said to suggest plans for possible rocket attacks against U.S. interests in Iraq, in connection with the one-year anniversary of the Soleimani killing. CNN echoed the Pentagon claims, alleging that Iran had moved short-range ballistic missiles into Iraq, and that Iraqi militias were planning “complex attacks.” But a “senior defense official” who had been directly involved in the discussions of those issues insisted to CNN that officials circulating such reports were deliberately exaggerating the threat of an attack. The CNN story strongly implied that acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s December 30 decision to bring the Nimitz back home was based on his belief that McKenzie and his allies were hyping a potential Iranian-sponsored attack to advance their command’s interests. Neither the Associated Press nor CNN explained to readers that the additional Iranian short-range missiles would have been been necessary precautions to strengthen deterrence in light of the series of the provocative U.S. shows of force involving B-52s and missile-carrying ships. Nor did they mention explicit statements by Iran that revenge for the Soleimani killing would be aimed not at U.S. troops but at the officials responsible for his assassination. In the end, Miller was forced to reverse his decision and keep the Nimitz in the Middle East — a significant win for McKenzie. And although the anniversary of the U.S. assassination of Soleimani came and went without incident, yet another flight of B-52s was carried out on January 7 — a bold demonstration of McKenzie’s bureaucratic victory over Miller. The political-bureaucratic power struggle that played out in the final weeks of the Trump administration suggests that McKenzie’s power and interests are likely to be a major influence on the Biden administration’s Iran policy. Still resisting the shift of military assets away from the Middle East, McKenzie will have a strong motive to oppose and obstruct any effort at easing tensions with Tehran. To achieve his aims, his ties with the military services and media will be among the most useful weapons in his arsenal. |
Coppercoal
User ID: 78912085 United States 01/17/2021 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79265846 United States 01/17/2021 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |