Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Oh HEY I've been meaning to ask this for forever, can you explain why mathematics is the only science that isn't/doesn't have to be based on reality? Mentioned a way long time ago

Calling Bullshit!

I rarely look at emails or messages. Public is best as, for me, it is the one most open to what the Self is.

[snippies]

The trick is in merging the two worlds. It's not really merging, since the physical world is actually a part of the metaphysical one. It's more like discovery of what the physical world really is and how much it can reflect your thoughts, if you allow yourself the pleasure.

Well that explains it!

However why are the clouds I see all resting on the same plane of atmospheric surface tension of air pressure resistance in a layer of the sky?

And when I look across from zenith onto the horizon line why do I see the same clouds in a descending pattern where all of their underside is visible?

They're on the same plane so why do i see their undersides as would be if their plane were curving?

That is if my theorie about them resting on the same plan is true! And all that stuff. Idk meteorology

Or science

Is JAH-RAH-JE on page 11 a typo or are there more than 4 syllables?

It is not a science, but a system of conceptual models. This has been argued for ages, and is an interesting topic.

What is "1" of anything, really? One pear? Where does the pear begin and end? In order for it to work we are focused on our reality having certain characteristics (where "1" of something can be measured).

We can create useful systems by developing models of reality, just as neuronics or English does, for example. Some languages would be far more useful for the kinds of reality we experience. Maths would be such a thing.

"Maths is everywhere" because we have constructed a reality in which it is everywhere. It would be like if only English was spoken in Earth and no other language. English would then be 'everywhere' because we have made it so. But it does not mean other kinds of languages would not be useful, or would even have the same basic rules. We would make it universal, not that it actually is.

But then someone might say, "Of course it is universal. We cannot imagine any other written or spoken language that is not based on English."

If our reality does not have the concept of "1" thing being "1", then maths is no longer useful.

We also invent new mathematical models to make maths that doesn't work, work.

Here's a pop version.

I had two spoons of sugar paste (generically stated) and waited for intuition about how to balance that out.

It took me to caffeine from coffee with milk.

It did dry me out. Then I took sips of ground water with pauses in between to see how it felt.

What do you think?

Is caffeine also chaos? Or maybe can sometimes the molecule is chaos, other times order?

Water alone for balance the sugar paste would then make me queasy.

Idk. Advice?

:)


That's venturing into the metaphysical world. One of the most interesting topics, in my onions.

The further out we look in space and time the more metaphysical our reality reveals itself to be.

That's what significant change looks like.

When the birds are a-chirping and the wind is perfect and everything is going well, change is fast asleep.

We learn more from failure, it is said. So, too, is there more of an opportunity for change with scatter-brains than whole brains. Change loves the scattiest of scat, for it is that in which the most nutrients for change are had for the laying of eggs.

I would suggest that your body may have negative reactions to healthy things because it is addicted.

But this can also apply to things like supplements (vitamins and minerals) when the body no longer makes certain things as the supplements are taken. (This is more obvious with things like Chap-Stick, where your body responds by no longer producing oils for them.)

You might try reading The Easy Way to Quit Smoking. It's directed around nicotine, ofc, but it seems fairly applicable to all addictions. Sugar, caffeine, nicotine. All things that "keep you" focused on this particular kind of perspective. It's like using DMT as a doorway to the world of machine elves and mantis people. Sugar, caffeine, etc. is a doorway to the world of false government.

Like craving salmon when your body needs omega-3:)

This is GENIUS! I love it, got my neurons firing. Particularly the bit about book of systems currency. Love love love

Good analogy.

Alot of people think they are sensing the metaphysical or unseen world when they do certain types of hard drugs.

But really they're sensing the structure of the drug and how their senses respond to that structure to formulate reality.

It's the same with food and drink. That is why food and drink were paramount in other times (before 1500, mostly) and healthy water, light, sound, and food was everywhere.

So, it is the same with sugar. Using it, we sense the structure of the sugar and our reality is changed by it.

Thanks. There's a lot more to come, if people like the format. We've only scratched the surface.

Yes. Much of this our bodies can make for itself, if we allow it. We really just need the basic fuels (i.e., a few simple foods and the right kind of water).

It's what the 'palace of versailles' was all about, and many/most of the 'castles' and 'fortresses' around the world were.

I think I don't get how to re-interpret things that are "already here" (to make them "go away"), or really re-interpretation in general.

I sort of get how to see more of something new, that's what the baader-meinhof phenomenon is, isn't it? Pay attention to/notice something (or, learn of it; define it), suddenly its everywhere (for me recently its cars with one of their tail lights out, everywhere!)

To "make something go away," ignoring it certainly doesn't work ("ignoring" generally erroneously considered to be the opposite of "focusing on"). Ignoring my debt is what made them go to collections in the first place! So it makes sense that you pay attention to something else instead of the thing you don't want (which Neville Goddard talks about, so I sort of get that in those terms). But I don't know how to do that because you can't really focus on a non-concept. Like you can focus on debt, you can't really focus on an absence of debt, bc that's just relating the focus to debt. So I don't know what to focus on instead, I guess.

I suppose I just need more practice with neruonics and the book of systems, though, because part of it is seeing the [thing not wanted] for the relationship it is which is the step before reinterpretation, so I'm probably putting the cart before the horse, so to speak.

What gets me, though, is that I'm already doing it of course. With the baader-meinhof effect, the "new" thing you're suddenly seeing everywhere is a reinterpretation of something else. When I move from one room to an other, that's a reinterpretation of the first room, essentially. I get that it's done with interactions with representations, but I don't get how to do it "on purpose" since the reinterpretation has been on autopilot all my life (in this perspective). There's this disconnect between knowing that any given perception comes to be perceived by interacting with its representations and knowing that I already do it wherein lies the practical "conscious" application.

Ughhhh once again I think I'll feel silly when I do "get it."

There's the other aspect of this that physically-oriented part of me is very resistant to the process. Debt collectors don't just forgive debt, the letters can't just disappear, I can't just get medical care for free (rip living in this interpretation of America). Like I know that's not how it actually works, but can't seem to shake it (yet)

Their nature being? Their "actual" sex or something deeper

Here's my little jar.

https://imgur.com/a/yoiIo8v

And a bonus sunset to sea

https://imgur.com/a/gpTaXjT

Do I detect a bit of fish-eye lens?

How does one distinguish between imagination and an actual metaphysical meeting?
Not to doubt the latter, it seems to be a certain possibility - just seems inaccessible with how calcified my pineal gland must be.

Oh thank goodness, the ones I've already sent a while ago are embarassingggg. I guess cringing at the past means I've grown (though I don't have to :p)

Speaking of which, I was going to DM you (though I expected you to respond publicly), but I'll just post it here:

I said a few days ago that I have a while to decide if I want to "go back" (experience 2012/2022 "now") bc I want to see how some things unfold in the next while, but I don't think I am too interested in seeing how things unfold, and it's all ways there anyway. Waiting to decide is just fear. At any rate, I've decided.

For the past 10 years, from what I can see from here, I've always just been waiting while simultaneously jumping the gun on decisions. My choices have made me, rather than me making them, if that makes sense. My choices also haven't wanted me for a very long time. The choice to ""go back"" is the first choice that feels like it does want me, if only I could let myself figure out how to make it. I could be wrong, and I guess I'll see in time :)

All that to say, I'd like your help in making a plan if you're still willing:)



What part of me isn't allowing myself the pleasure?? I'd like to have a word, lol :)

Well don't make my cry for onions. You're saying there's MOAR??

Well there is much scat over in my corner. If I saw a psychiatrist right now, they'd probably define me as manic (though I do not agree with the vast majority of modern psychology), I'm all over the place. Come to think of it, most of the significant change in my life, both good and bad, has come in times where I've felt like this!

Then in the future I am free of the addiction now!

Sensing the structure...

Going long without food results in a fatigued, ornery state.

Persisting this, what are possible outcomes?

For now the procedure is consuming material nutrients.

Can there be a predictable duration after which material nutrient food dependency is cleared?