Urgent Covid Pfizer vaccine female infertility concerns: read The FULL Petition

I didn't see what constituted evidence of infertility issues directly but what i did se was women were only allowed in the study that were not pregnant and using an acceptable form of birth control. Unless i read that incorrectly. Acceptable ? Sounds as if they really didn't want anyone pregnant taking their vax or someone to get pregnant during the trial.

Red flag.

Skip to the end. It's safer to catch Covid 19. Pfizer: Vaccine Causes Sterility

The Aschen would be impressed with Pfizer. Stargate SG-1

From the paper:

"XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.

There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.

XII. It appears that Pfizer/BioNTech has not yet released any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, instructions/information patients/subjects were given regarding ADE and PEG-related issues and (potential) fertility- or pregnancy-specific issues".

Therefore, it is a theoretical concern,but one that has NOT been disproven due to the lack of effective long-term safety studies.

Syncytin-1 is essential to form a human placenta and a successful pregnancy.
[link to www.sciencedirect.com (secure)]

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

The spike protein contains an analog of Synctin-1 so a vaccine against the spike protein could potentially cross-react with an antibody response to Synctin-1. Rember the HIV inserts were also in the spike protein, and that wasn't supposed to be significant and, yet, we have seen so far one trial in Australia halted due to false-positive HIV tests presumably due to an antibody response to those inserts...:

From the link below the quote:
"The spike protein belongs to Class I of fusion entry proteins. These are constructed of a series of structural and functional domains and motifs that may be highly conserved in localized regions. Insofar as sequence motifs of nCoV2019 show high similarity to the Class I fusion/entry proteins of endogenous viruses expressed as part of the human genome – to which we would be expected to be tolerant – response to nCoV2019 could be significantly affected.

Indeed, alignment of the endogenous elements Syn1 found on human chromosome 7, or Syn2 found on chromosome 6, or HERV-K expressed from chromosome 6, all show a number of sequence motifs with significant similarity to nCoV2019 spike protein.

The first region comprises the majority of Wuhan HR1a of S2, with the corresponding region of HERV-W (Syn1). Basically, the alignment shows that HR1a of nCoV2019 and HR1 of Syn1 are directly related to one another".

[link to virological.org (secure)]

The problem is we will not have any long-term studies to disprove this concern, we must rely on blind-faith without the necessary long-term follow-up studies.

So in other words....we simply don't know, but I am not willing to take that chance, especially since we have an EFFECTIVE alternative therapy that has been proven in billions of doses around the world, and is already being used as one of WHO's "essential medications and that therapy is Ivermectin.



As always, All of the above is my personal opinion and in no way represents medical advice and is merely presented for the purposes of entertainment and discussion.

Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 10:46 AM

5 stars for you

I'm heavily involved in the covid response. And do absolutely everything I can to inform the public about matters such as this. Encourage them to read, use critical thinking.

A very simple summary of the petition submitted by a former Pfizer VP and a German physician:

If you read the entire petition, the evidence is damming.


1. Flaws in the PCR tests inflate numbers of infections.

2. ADE prevented vaccine for Coronavirus in SARS (2002) and MWRS (2008). ADE created life-threatening cytokine storm and death more reliably in vaccinated versus unvaccinated animals.

3. The vaccine endpoints are against the legendarily questionable PCR tests rather than necessary endpoints such as hospital admissions, ICU admissions, or death. Therefore the vaccine has also not been tested to see if it can interrupt transmission. So essentially the testing was designed NOT to fail and yet, has thus far NOT proven worthwhile so far to decrease serious illness, death, or transmission.

So, therefore, why give it to healthy people when a therapeutic drug, only given to those who need it would be safer?

4. There is an unaddressed concern about an ingredient derived from a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, into its vaccine. The ingredient has bioluminescent qualities; making its incorporation in the vaccine puzzling except for possibly helping to identify those who have or have not had this presumably “voluntary vaccine".

5. There is an unaddressed concern about the potential for the estimated 70% of the population who have an antibody response to the PEG, fatty lipid nanoparticle coating around the mRNA, envelope possibly causing a significant adverse reaction, up to, and including death.

6. There is an unaddressed concern about the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1, which is esssential for a successful pregnancy in humans.


I would add to the above:

7. There is an unaddressed concern about the formation of humoral antibodies against the HIV insert proteins of SARS-CoV-2, which are potentially responsible for a false-positive HIV test in humans.

8. There is an obvious attempt to ignore the efficacy and safety of the Nobel prize-winning drug, FDA approved since the mid-1970s and given already in billions of doses around the world; Ivermectin, unless; this oversight is intentionally geared to excusing the approval of vaccines that otherwise would possibly NOT pass long-term safety testing.


As always, none of this is intended as medical advice but merely provided for entertainment purposes and especially the purposes of open and free discussion.

Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 12:22 PM

Just a reminder that there are ~70 members of the CCP directly connected to Pfizer.

https://imgur.com/a/lcPGNRp

If this was bio-engineered, and I have it on good authority that is at least a possibility based on some of the sequences...

then incorporation of the sync-1 protein into the spike, along with the HIV inserts was a stroke of genius.

Any vaccine targeting the spike would also presumably target the sync-1 protein necessary for human reproduction.

It all seems a bit too perfect....

And we should always have blind faith in our vaccine industry, right...

Remembering the Baxter debacle...

[link to www.ctvnews.ca (secure)]

I guess I am just not so trusting anymore. Older and wiser, and sadder.... about the world we now live in

As always, none of this is intended as medical advice but merely provided for entertainment purposes and especially the purposes of open and free discussion.

Pfizer got away with drugging many with opoid?.

Here one taken from deleted thread, and Trump is the king unjust.

C8 Q62
When one sees the holy temple plundered,
the greatest of the Rhone profaning their sacred things;
because of them a very great pestilence will appear,
the king, unjust, will not condemn them.

P: I should say what I first saw. It really doesn't go very well with those words though.
D: That's all right; we're speaking of translations anyway.
P: Yes, translations of riddles. This is interesting because I can hardly remember the words that you just read. I can only remember the pictures that I saw in my mind. My first impression seemed to be pyramids. When I see pyramids my mind thinks Egypt but something said Atlantis, so I don't know. And I was thinking in terms of Atlantis and their tools and technology, and the Atlantean's beliefs about everything they could do. In the end they brought down great death and destruction. I see the person whom we could call their king. I don't think king is the right term, but I can't think of the correct term. He seemed to be the person in charge. He did not stop the Atlanteans because they needed this is not the right terminology. They didn't need destruction, but they needed to not continue in the same thought processes, the same programs and activities. There was a person who saw he could not change an entire continent, so their self-destructionwas allowed.
D: Why is Nostradamus using that example of Atlantis?
P: I don't know that Nostradamus was. I was simply reporting the first thoughts that came to my mind. I know we are trying to see what he says, but I can't distinguish where these thoughts are coming from. I see a whole mess that needed to be fixed, and the way to fix it was to start over. I can't differentiate whether it's coming from him or me. Ask aspecific question to him, not a riddle.
D: Okay. If this is a reference to Atlantis, is it referring to something else as a riddle, as symbolism?
P: A riddle within a riddle? He said I gave that answer because I didn't want to say what it really meant. (Softly) Well, it seems the quatrain is talking about right now in our present time period. The pestilence we've unleashed is AIDS, which is actually the father of an infinite number of mutated biological entities. I just wouldn't say that. It's easier to look upon these things as having happened in the past, rather than happening now at this moment.
D: Using that definition, what is the holy temple? "When one sees the holy temple plundered."
P: I guess this is the response: it is the heart and mind of man. I think we've gotten very screwed up in our emotions and our way of dealing with humanity and all living things. We're also the ones who created these biological mutations.
D: You mean man did?
P: (Emphatic) Yes! We created AIDS.
D: Some people think it was just a mutation of an existing virus.
P: A mutation that was consciously done, yes. The original intent was not to create killers. The intent was to find more helpful vaccines. It didn't work out that way. I should say it was not intentionally developed to be a species exterminating mutation. It was intended to be two things. The outward intention for this experimentation that resulted in AIDS was: One, to help strengthen or determine a new vaccine for an already existing virus. There was another secret reason, and that was biological warfare. But I don't wish to continue talking about it. It's very distressing.
D: Sometimes knowledge is not pleasant, but it is necessary. That's the reason he is giving us this information. We can go on to another one, but you may see other things that are distressing.
P: Seeing distressing things is not the problem. I can look at them dispassionately as a story. I don't know how to describe it. It has something to do with my levels of feeling. There seems to be anautomatic censor that wants to click in when we come to things that are occurring now or in our future. However, I am trying to get through that. This might take a couple of attempts because I didn't realize how strong it is about not letting me say what I'm getting. But I don't feel personally pained.
D: Can he see any personalities or individuals that will arise during our time period that will have a great deal of influence, either positive or negative?
P: The first figure that I see in the mirror is a woman who looks East Indian. She has something like a diaphanous veil that is sheer and thin, beautiful. And her body is almost wrapped, because her gown doesn't really have a shape, but the quality of the material is so delicate and beautiful it looks like spun gold and air. She had a red dot on her forehead, and a glowing, loving bearing that's also strong and powerful. She is capable, but very loving and nurturing at the same time. I understand this to represent the feminine principal, but is so strong that there is actually more than one person inhabiting a female body on the planet of the Earth right now in 1989 who has the clarity of thought, the depth of emotion and the range of perception to lift and enlighten large segments of the population. There are many countries on the planet that have a great deal of people in them. These women -maybe as many as three- are alive today on the planet. According to his extremely chauvinistic attitude, this was a big deal to even admit there would be any women who would be looked up to as world leaders, or even world teachers. He isn't comfortable with that concept. But that's what he saw, so he's honest in his reporting. They will be teachers or leaders who will make a difference to the world. These women extend beyond the boundaries of their own countries. Their teachings and life examples are so astounding and news worthy that the rest of the world comes to know of them. There's also a large embracing of what they say. I think it's unusual that there are more than one, but then all of this is unusual. It's strange to see this woman with the red dot on her forehead looking out at me through the mirror. He says the purpose of this whole exercise is to enlighten people to their capability of making choices. To show them that their thoughts are powerful, huge important tools and techniques for bringing to them whatever it is they focus on.

Far less than 50% Conversations With Nostadamus Vol 3

Here two, and the most important:

C8 Q62
When one sees the holy temple plundered,
the greatest of the Rhone profaning their sacred things;
because of them a very great pestilence will appear,
the king, unjust, will not condemn them.

D: I wanted to ask him about a situation that is occurring now in my time period, in June of 1989. Can he comprehend that far ahead of the future?
B: He's insulted that you feel you should even ask. He said he wishes you could see even half of the things he's seen in his mirror. He has seen much further into the future than 1989.
D: There are some very strange things occurring in our time period that have to do with the Communist countries in Europe and parts of Asia. All of a sudden everything seems to be changing. Is he able to see what's bringing all this about and what the results will be?
B: He says there are several possibilities. He's taking a moment to get his thoughts in order. He says it's on the very eve of greater changes to come. Whenever there's going to be massive social or political change, there are warning signs before the big surge of change comes. He says as an example, a king can always tell when the peasants are going to revolt because they get particularly restless, and the crime rate goes up. He says on a larger scale, when on the eve of sweeping worldwide change, a few small countries will go into upheaval for no apparent reason. There'll be more open demonstration, marches in the street and civil restlessness. That is because the way things are set up, certain countries or certain particular systems of society may be particularly sensitive or vulnerable to the changes that are coming. So they react first, and this is a warning sign that bigger changes are on the way.
D: This is such a tremendous thing because we never thought the Communist countries and the Communist party would ever change.
B: This is true. He says the agents of the Anti-Christ and the agents of the Cabal have been trying to create their own spheres of dominance in the so-called "underworld." Most of the time they have the same goals in mind, and so they work parallel to each other and don't affect each other. But there will be times when they will conflict with what they want to accomplish, and you'll see interesting results. He says in the case of Eastern Europe and Russia the Cabal was in favor of keeping the Communist running the way it was because they were able to siphon off the majority of a particular nation's wealth through the front of the Communist party. However, on the other hand, the Anti Christ in the process of making his plans and getting his empire together wants things to be a little bit unstable. He wants social unrest to take place, to make it easier to tip things over and set up his own order of things.
D: Everybody is thinking that these countries wanting freedom is a very positive thing.
B: He says, on a short-term basis it is a positive thing. It will also help towards the rebuilding of the world afterwards.
D: Then you don't think this will stop the Anti-Christ? I thought it was the complete opposite of what he wanted, if countries were gaining freedom.
B: They are gaining freedom. But you must understand this is a very big change in the country. It's toppling things over, so far as different institutions of the government. The society is going through much change. Whereas before they had nothing, now all of a sudden they're able to own land again, or have things on the grocery shelves. And so the people will be more vulnerable to outside influence. Although the people are yearning towards freedom, and working towards it, everything's changing and moving and not stable. So the Anti-Christ can send agents in to keep things stirred up, and make it easier for him to take over in a subtle way.
D: Does Nostradamus see this as the end of the Communist party?
B: He thinks the Communist party, as a name, will continue. But their structure will be different, and the goals they will be working towards will be different. They'll be doing a great deal of changing. He says one thing that's going to happen, they'll go back and reread Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and the others from a totally different viewpoint and put a totally new interpretation on this. And this interpretation will be more congenial towards world peace than the previous interpretation and application.
D: These sound like positive things.
B: Yes. It’s positive in that these different organizations are able to start working together better now. If the worst comes to worst, many of them will form part of the underground network during the time of the Anti-Christ. If they're able to start working together now, they'll be able towork together better then.
D: But it sounds like these things will weaken Russia.
B: Russia will be weakened some, but she won't be as vulnerable as the eastern European countries. Just the geographical shape and size of Russia is her strength. The balance of power may alter some, and she may be making more lenient treaties with the United States, for example. But when the Anti-Christ sends someone into Russia to try to take over or what have you, Russia is so big that she'll be able to resist very well. If nothing else, she can follow the scorched earth policy as she did with Hitler and Napoleon, by retreating and burning everything down to the ground to prevent the armies from going further. Of course, with modern aircraft, that would not be as effective. But the eastern European countries will be particularly vulnerable because they've never been very stable anyway, with the mixture of tribes within the countries and the different ethnic groups. And with this new unrest to be dealt with on top of their basic instability, the Anti-Christ really won't find it much of a challenge at all.
D: People are saying they can't see how these negative events that Nostradamus has foreseen could happen. It is as though everything is going in another direction.
B: (Chuckle) His eyes are twinkling. He says, yes, things are going very positively in Russia and Eastern Europe, and it would be good if they could continue to develop in that direction. He asks, however, has anyone taken a good close look at the Middle East lately?. Remember, the Anti-Christ's central power is there. He'll be coming from the Middle East, and things are not getting any better there.
D: If something was happening in just one country, you could watch its development easier. But in this case, everything's happening at once.
B: Yes. He says you overwhelm the opposition, so to speak, with numbers. And the Cabal is not happy with this situation because if Eastern Europe works toward freedom, that will mean a freer flow of money within society. More of it will filter down to the middle and lower classes, with less to be scraped off the top.
D: And this is not what they want to happen?
B: No. As was mentioned earlier, the Cabal and the agents of the Anti-Christ occasionally come into conflict, and this is one of those areas. Because the Cabal favors Communism, and the agents of the Anti Christ really don't care if it's Communist or not. They're just trying to instigate change for change's sake, to make it easier for them.
D: Does he see these countries forming their own governments?
B: He says that's already in the process. It will be much as the Italian government was in the 1920s and 1930s. New governments will form that will be freely elected, and the Communist party will be booted out of power. There would be a different party in power, but there would still be two or three other parties who think they should have won the election. And they will have demonstrations and marches, and demand another election.
D: This will all be occurring during the same time as the Anti-Christ, so he will use the confusion to his advantage.
B: The decade of the 1990s is going to be extremely eventful. (This reminds me of the old Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times.")
D: It looks as if it's off to a good start. (Chuckle) There's a lot happening, and it's happening very fast.
B: He says, precisely. The suddenness of it should make you suspicious. Can't you see there's someone behind the scenes pulling the puppet's strings?. In any large operation or large endeavor there's going to be both positive and negative things happening. And regardless of which thing you're struggling for, you really can't help the occurrence of the other along with it. Although the agents of the Anti-Christ are basically striving towards what would be considered negative goals, in some places there may be positive side effects. They really can't do much about that.

Far less than 50% Conversations With Nostradamus Vol 3

Here is the FDA COVID 19 Vaccine - the FDA Monitoring the effectiveness:


FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines :
DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes
***Subject to change***
 Guillain-Barré syndrome
 Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
 Transverse myelitis
 Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/
meningoencephalitis/meningitis/
encepholapathy
 Convulsions/seizures
 Stroke
 Narcolepsy and cataplexy
 Anaphylaxis
 Acute myocardial infarction
 Myocarditis/pericarditis
 Autoimmune disease
 Deaths
 Pregnancy and birth outcomes
 Other acute demyelinating diseases
 Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
 Thrombocytopenia
 Disseminated intravascular coagulation
 Venous thromboembolism
 Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
 Kawasaki disease
 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
in Children
 Vaccine enhanced disease


Here is the Link: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)]

Download it and what? Show someone it's real? XD I can make a document that says chocolate cures cancer and keep it handy "in case it disappears.

So...you have a pamphlet. Now what are you going to do?

I just got an email from where I work,

$hit, I am a tier II priority for the vaccine but at least not a Tier I so I have some time....

I am NOT submitting, this is my personal decision based upon legitimate questions of science and protocol that I cannot ignore, and I need to talk to my lawyer.

I am not giving up...researching mitigation and blocking strategies...

If I find them, I will post them.

I don't care anymore...let them fire me.


we are all in this together...

As always, none of this is intended as medical advice but merely provided for entertainment purposes and especially the purposes of open and free discussion.

FB fax chekd me for this one bout a week ago.. But if the sheep see it, that's enough no need to look further.. whts funny is I explained the same thing as the fax chekd supposedly corrected me/article on.

To answer your question, whatever I can legally do. !!

People who can read the document and understand science can independently confirm (or deny) its arguments. There are many, many people able to do this! The point is Pfizer isn't even trying to respond to the specific concerns, instead, this information is being buried and open discussion prevented. .

I am providing information for the purpose of open discussion, information that everyone should be aware of.

And.. it's not a "pamphlet" its a petition filled in the EU...to the following:
European Medicines Agency
Committee for human medicinal products (CHMP)
COVID-19 EMA pandemic Task Force (COVID-ETF)
Domenico Scarlattilaan 6
1083 HS Amsterdam
The Netherlands
[email protected]
[email protected]

by the following:
[link to www.wodarg.com (secure)]

English version:
[link to www.wodarg.com (secure)]

[link to www.wodarg.com (secure)]


These agencies received this information, filed December 1.
It will take time for them to respond to it. Meanwhile, the vaccine is being deployed as we speak.

It is up to Pfizer and the other vaccine manufacturers to legitimately address those specific concerns instead of providing the "drug-rep commercials" we are now getting in place of scientific discussion.


What are you afraid of?

As always, none of this is intended as medical advice but merely provided for entertainment purposes and especially the purposes of open and free discussion.

Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 01:04 PM

Purposely suppressed.



As always, none of this is intended as medical advice but merely provided for entertainment purposes and especially the purposes of open and free discussion.

Quoted, less than 50%..

"We are asking all European citizens for co-signing the petition. You find the prepared E-Mail to send to the EMA and the text of the petition here.

1.12.2020 Together with the ex-Pfizer head of research Dr. Michael Yeadon, I submitted an application to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, on 1 December 2020 for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV-2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).


We call for the studies to be continued - for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers - only once a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns raised by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.


As petitioners, we demand on the one hand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used in a serious study. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccination benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty. For this reason alone, such tests of vaccines on humans are unethical per se.



Furthermore, we demand that it must be ruled out beforehand that risks already known from previous studies, some of which stem from the nature of corona viruses, may have a dangerous effect. Our concerns relate in particular to the following points:



The formation of so-called "non-neutralising antibodies" can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when test persons are confronted with the real, "wild" virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these trials, all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after being infected with real corona viruses. This overreaction is further encouraged by potentiators.



The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It is essential to rule out the possibility that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune response against syncytin-1, otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.



The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance - which means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccine.



The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimate of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, if emergency approval were planned, late effects would only be observed when it is already too late for millions of vaccinated people. Governments plan to expose millions of healthy people to unacceptable risks and force them to be vaccinated by discriminatory restrictions on unvaccinated people.



Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on 1 December 2020. Scientific responsibility compels us to take this action.

[link to www.wodarg.com (secure)]

Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 01:11 PM

here is a paper written at the expert level which discusses similarity between SARS-COV2 and human DNA sequences related to forming the placenta in women, one of which codes for the protein "syncytin-1" and in our DNA is in a region thought to have originated with an ancient retrovirus referred to as "HERV-W" (the 'HERV' is short for Human endogenous retroviruses [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] )

Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses
[link to virological.org (secure)]

it does look alarming to me

i found the above expert level paper referenced in this one at closer to a layman level "OF HERVS AND COVID-19: QUESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE" [link to bjgplife.com (secure)]

Which i found while fact checking this mainstream media fact-check debunking dr. wodarg's petition

Fact check: A false post on social media claims COVID-19 vaccine causes infertility in women
[link to www.usatoday.com (secure)]

from the expert level paper id draw your attention to

"Within the boxed regions, stereochemistry is identical. Any element of the host response that has seen the one in HERV-K would be expected to respond identically to that within nCoV2019.

Given the high similarity of this peptide region in nCoV2019 to endogenous retroviral peptide sequence, one hypothesis of the purpose of this region in nCoV2019 would be as a toleragen, or, when clipped out of the protein between the two endoproteolytic sites in S, as a soluble decoy peptide."

and the diagrams above it showing portions of sars-cov2 protein and herv-k encoded protein are very similar (herv-k is another ancient retrovirus whos expression is involved in formation of the placenta [link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)] "Human endogenous retrovirus K (HERV-K) is expressed in villous and extravillous cytotrophoblast cells of the human placenta" )

that's a pretty thorough petition!

thank you.

YES - maybe worse

one more thing from the expert level paper

"Note that identical amino acids tend to be in every other position. In a beta sheet, these would lie on one side of the sheet, rendering its stereochemistry from that aspect identical, as shown in the following figure"

this is interesting because it doesnt involve an exact match between sequences but instead every other amino acid matches. a beta sheet is a protein that basically has two different sides or edges, and this is saying this will cause one of those two edges to be the same, which in turn could cause antibodies which recognize one to also recognize the other

what is interesting is that it could (conceivably) foil a lazy or simple-minded comparison based on just looking for similar sequences, i dont know if that perspective has any merit, i.e. whether anyone attempting to compare the two might be fooled by the fact its only every other amino acid that is the same instead of a sequence that exactly matches

Note from the USA. A doctor on Fox News said we should hit herd immunity by May 2021.

Genius level work if this was pre-planned.

When I had someone look at the HIV inserts he explained to me how, as the sequence was linearly manufactured, after coiling, for the HIV insert segments to match exactly the points of the triangle; was "impressive work".

Look at the image in Figure 3 of the PDF (keep scrolling down the page):
[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

" Figure 3. Modelled homo-trimer spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV virus. The inserts from HIV envelop protein are shown with colored beads, present at the binding site of the protein."

They are the red, yellow, orange and olive green colored areas, notice how nicely they line up with the points on a spike binding protein that was linearly assembled.

As before, all of the above just for entertainment and discussion purposes and not intended as medical advice.

Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 01:43 PM

Good hope the rumor is true. Stupid breeders.

Thread: New Chinese Study Confirms COVID-19 Attacks Testicles, May Affect Male Fertility

Disease causes male infertility.

Vax causes female infertility.

Remember the movie "Children of Men"? A whole generation without any births.

Maybe we deserve it. If the virus is natural perhaps nature has good reason for it.

I don't think we as humans would deserve that.

I think it falls more under "crimes against humanity"

I don't think we can play God. Maybe there are too many of us, but deciding to indiscriminately eliminate a certain percentage is repugnant and is rejected by ethical people everywhere.

One thing that I have always believed in; is that good will eventually prevail over evil. Now my belief is being sorely tested.

The unethical element seems to be in charge, aided by planned ignorance.



Last Edited by emerald eye on 12/15/2020 02:37 PM