Mind Control...BRAINWASHING...and Psychology...What do you know?

Seems like he's saying a lot without actually saying anything at all to me...

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

What do you think of this OP?

I'm well versed in this subject btw. I have a whole blog with articles about it.

Hello GLP friends,

If you are familiar with my threads, then you know what to expect. This is not for everyone on GLP. And that's fine.

However, since you are here, the thread title probably caught your interest. This is a VERY IMPORTANT topic, especially right now, because what is happening in 2020 to the world is a massive MIND CONTROL operation!

So, how does it work?

And how would you even know if you are under the influence of MIND CONTROL? Would you even know?

My threads are lengthy, because I cannot share a college level education in a quick, witty, bit. But, if you hang with me for a little while longer, I'll tell you what I'm serving up for dinner!

I'll also try to make this thread entertaining, with videos, and memes (which we call smilies on GLP) and whatever else will help break up the academic nature of this thread.

First, you might want to know why I have anything to offer on this subject. I have a college degree in Philosophy, and I also studied some Psychology in college. It is not necessary to go to college for an education, especially since the introduction of the internet. What Philosophy taught me was critical thinking skills; among many other things. It's not just Plato and Aristotle, although you might be surprised to learn what these men knew about MIND CONTROL over 2000 years ago!

I first became interested in MIND CONTROL while in college, when a hypnotist came to our campus and put on a show. The auditorium was packed full of students, because we all wanted to see and learn how this works.

I was there with some very good friends. The hypnotist asked for volunteers, and many people raised their hands. About 12 were selected, and went on the stage. One of my friends was selected. And what I witnessed that evening blew my mind!

I will share with you everything I know about mass-hypnosis, "brainwashing", propaganda, cults, MK-Ultra, NLP (Neuro-linguistic programming), Manchurian Candidates, and much more!

But it's really up to you GLP.

I will not continue to put in effort if nobody cares. By that I mean, this thread requires YOUR participation. Add comments, ask questions, post a video, share what you have to offer...but please stay on topic.

Are you ready to get started?

Let's start with this very famous movie scene from "Star Wars". Trust me, George Lucus knew EXACTLY what he was doing, and was well trained in the esotaric/occult arts.

We have lot's of ground to cover, and I'll stay with this thread as long as there are students who want to attend class. Let me know, or this thread will die on the vine.



:orange clockwork:

Oh, you just dropped a subtle little clue in your reply! I see it. And you mixed it in nicely with a little sexual energy talk. And FEAR!

Yet, some of the newbies here want us to spoon feed them, and they cannot see that your comment is more than a simple message. The newbies want an elementary education. But you just dropped them a simple, yet meaningful explanation in a nutshell of MIND CONTROL. You said a lot in that brief message.

The class has already started folks.

Lance just dropped a BOMB!

So many teachers...

Lance, Marlin.

It’s challenging to find the point when everyone wants to teach with their, “input and comments.”

I must be too advanced as, “agape,” is already the process I’ve been in for years.

So, with that input and comment, enjoy your discussions.

Hello, Light of my Little Left Eye!

Holy Crap...that thread is 105 pages long. I'll try to give it a fast skimming, but that is a ton.

As for your blog, if you'd like to share that with us, that would be great.

But even better is simply your participation. I took time to write about this thread being an advanced course, therefore this should be a perfect place for you. We work together on this thread/course!

I should write a syllabus for this, and a time-frame. I'll do that.

I'm glad you are here!
:a1sauce:

DISCLAIMER!!!
I did not write this to promote mind control and manipulation. Literally the opposite is the case. One of the only proven defenses again psychological manipulation is being aware of the methods by which it is instigated so that you can recognize manipulation and consciously disaffect yourself from it.

Yes, it may be triggering. This is the "cerebral" nitty gritty stuff of how people are turned into mental slaves.

If you are doubtful that this stuff is really possible, think about it this way. Why are cults so insidious? How can abusive people with certain personality traits create such a state of dependence upon the abusee that they stay despite the fact that they are being treated terribly?

Some dubious people realized that studying these areas might hold the key to manipulating people in a deep and systematic way. That's why the aspects which make cult programming so "sticky" and impossible to break (even in adults who had no childhood programming). And why certain intelligences agencies saw cult methodologies as an important area for study to extrapolate the principles that make some kinds brainwashing so particularly effective.

The trauma bond is of the peculiar sort. It creates a connection between both handler/programmer and subject that is real, and despite being dysfunctional for the psychological health of the subject, and unlike the normal abusive relationship, this dysfunction is used deliberately and systematically to the ends of mental manipulation.

LAST but not LEAST: this is a limited introduction to the subject matter which is quite expansive in full scope and breadth. But many should still find it quite informative as it discusses some of the most fundamental concepts and areas of focus. Note that indeed, this is far from complete - hopefully I will have the opportunity to expand upon thread later.


The source material of the following is Chainless_Slaves The following is a [HIGHLY] paraphrased version of content from within that source . Shit Sitemind-control/chain-less-slaves/

Essentially, this is a distillation/outline/summery of notes.
It is also located here.
Shit Sitemind-control/
Yes it is a work in progress.

I PROGRAMMING & VALUE SYSTEMS

Main Idea
One of the most important motivators of human behavior is our underlying system of values. Once your underlying values have been revealed or determined, you will be much easier to manipulate. The programmer will attempt to do this by slowly altering your sense of values so that it is in line with their programming goals.

Align with Subject’s Values: a conversation may start with ideas and will gradually transition to a discussion about what is right or wrong, good or bad, important or less important.

If you change these rules in a subject’s head, the programmer will have no need to constantly police them, as the subject’s internal voice itself will do it for you once the values are internalized.

Progressive Conversion: The further the distance between the subject’s initial set of values and those intended by the programmer, the more gradual the process of conversion of values must progress. A sudden conversion is much less likely to succeed.

Control of Values: It must be clear to the subject who is ‘in charge’ – that it is the programmer who is setting the values. One way this is done in the cult hierarchical setting and in military programming is to instill first one basic value in the group: obey without question.

Changing Values: while converting the subject, one key thing a programmer does is move into the realm of ideas and values.....IE:
--anything not tangible/physical
--socio/political ideals
--religious/spiritual ideals
The subject is thereby placed in the programmer’s ideological world.

Align with Programming Values: show alignment towards the subject and they will reciprocate even without conscious awareness, aligning towards you and your value system as a response to your understanding. In other words, when the subject is shown appreciation they will reciprocate and bond with the programmer, thus connecting their sense of identity to that of the handler/programmer’s.

Embodiment of Values: programmer is to appear as the decisive embodiment of the values they are attempting to align the subject towards. It doesn’t matter if it’s real or an illusion, but it must appear true. The programmer should work to develop an image of God-hood in the eyes of the subject. Even if this is never directly stated, and only implied.

Programmers Take Charge of Values: More control of a subject occurs when a programmer is able to take full control of the subject’s values. In fact, this is the basis of total control.

II TRAUMA & CONTROL

What is “TRAUMA BONDING“? Essentially, it refers to the process by which the programmer convinces the subject that they are cared for and understood by the programmer/handler in a way that they are not understood by anybody else; and furthermore that nobody could or would ever understand a subject as well as the programer/handler does.

The process of trauma bonding has several component parts and there is a consistent methodology used to invoke such programming. Common strategies will be discussed below. One of the first parts of gaining control over behavior, however, is to create a clear differentiation in power between the subject and the handler/programmer. One of the ways to effectively and quickly accomplish this is to make the subject aware that their behavior is under the control and active manipulation of the Handler.

When the subject realizes that definite limits have been placed on their ability to react and respond, they will give the Handler with a level of control by providing subconscious ‘consent’ to respond to the suggestions of the Handler.

The Basic Methodology of Psychological Trauma

- The PROGRAMMER seeks to induce a state of anxiety/guilt.
- Tension reduces the mind’s ability to think and judge clearly, which is why mental and physical fatigue are sought in the subject.

Sensory Bombardment/Fatigue: Some of the ways that physical and psychological exhaustion are induced include the following – being bombarded by loud noises/music, flashing bright lights, prolonged sleep deprivation, environmental control, cages, loud/continuous noises, love bombing, and specific aspects of a sterile environment.

The idea is to overload the senses, interfering with cognition and concentration.



The PROGRAMMER seeks to

Create a Sense of Powerlessness : this is attained through pain, degradation, and control of a subject’s time



The PROGRAMMER seeks to
Isolate the Subject from the World: The only reality is the programmers/handlers.

When the subject is isolated, only the programmer’s ideological reality is allowed to exist in the subject’s world.

Whatever “Papa Bear” (Handler/Programmer) dictates becomes reality.

ISOLATION: creates anxiety in the subject, increasing their desire to be with others that share similar circumstances (IE, trauma bond with other victims)

CONTROL OF SOCIAL NETWORK: subject will be denied friends and contacts outside of the controlled environment. This includes all naturally occurring relationships, which will be denied in the interest of promoting relationships that are in line with programmer’s goals.

By utilizing isolation, the PROGRAMMER seeks to create a state of severe insecurity in the subject.

This INSECURITY is used in several ways…

A) Emotional isolation leads to impaired reasoning within the subject. This makes the subject vulnerable to the approaches of insincere individuals, and these insincere individuals will take advantage of the subject’s desperation for emotional connection.

B) The programmer deliberately uses these insincere individuals to hurt the subject emotionally and reinforce “TRUST NO ONE” programming.

C) The goal of this is to promote the idea that only the programmer/handler is deserving of trust, and all others are a source of pain and betrayal.

D) The subject is thus isolated from supportive peer groups who might help break the programming

E) The subject also becomes emotionally dependent upon the handler/programmer

III DEGRADATION OF SELF/IDENTITY

Assault on Identity : The handler/programmer attacks the subject’s sense of self and their core belief system. This is done by denying the characteristics used by the subject to define themselves

For example; programmers may make assertions like, “you are not a boy/girl”, “you are not intelligent”, “you are not athletic”, etc.

A constant attack for days, weeks, months, or even years may be gradual but it will wear down the subject’s identity over time, or at the very least degrade his or her sense of confidence in identity.

Bombardment with Accusations
The subject is ISOLATED during which time they are accused of various transgressions by programmers/handlers.

The accusations start with negligible transgressions to make confession an easier process. This is because for every confession successfully elicited, no longer how diminutive or insignificant its content, future confessions will be easier for the subject to make as his sense of self is altered by the act of confession itself.

In other words, the more confessions a subject makes, the more they will become inclined to internalize their behavior as “wrong-doings” leading to a concrete (if gradual) change in VALUE system which as we have mentioned, is an essential aspect of control.

The goal is to slowly escalate the confessions in severity in order to promote guilt within the subject and concede obedience to the handler.

NOTE: this method should be completed with a number of Programmers. The more educated and influential voices add to the chorus, the more effective is the technique and the greater the induction of guilt becomes.

Loss of Identity/Sense of Self: ultimately, the subject loses their self and surrenders it to the handler/programmer. This is the goal of this stage of the programming process. It is facilitated by an eventual nervous breakdown, after which the self/personality can be rebuilt by programmers and handlers. That being said, the goal initially is to encourage this breakdown to occur.

DISSOLUTION OF BOUNDARIES SEPARATING SELF & OTHER: once the sense of self has been lost, the subject loses contact with ego boundaries which induces a state of profound disorientation and confusion. There is some Alice in Wonderland / Wizard of Oz programming features in this stage, being that once it is achieved, the subject no longer has concrete knowledge of where he or she begins and ends, and where his or her handler/programmer begins and ends. The boundaries normally separating our ego consciousness dissolve, but not in an empowering or liberating way. Instead, they are dissolved to the effort of promoting profound disorientation and confusion.


Consequences of Dissolution of Identity:

The awareness of the Handler’s control, in addition to the recognition by the subject of their emotional dependance upon the programmer/handler, will cause internal conflict within the subject, leading to a breakdown of previous patterns of behavior.

The degree of dissolution and disorientation that results from the dissolution of identity will often vary as a function of the subject’s age. Younger subjects, with their less concrete and bounded sense of selfhood and identity, will deal with this process with much less distress then older adults are likely to experience.

In essence, the more concrete and solidified the subject’s sense of ‘self’ and ‘identity’, the greater and more profound will be the effect of dissolving his/her relationship to his/her self.

“Since the programmers aim to have individuals undergo profound emotional change, they force their subjects to seek out, painfully, what is required of them by the controlling individual“

During the period of time following the dissolution of identity the subject is likely to suffer from a mental breakdown characterized by delusions and hallucinations


The Breaking Point

The breaking point is characterized by a nervous breakdown with the following features:
1) uncontrollable sobbing
2) deep depression
3) general disorientation
4) feelings of being completely lost or alone

Push to the Breaking Point: For the handler/programmer to accomplish the goal of personality dissolution the subject must be pushed past the breaking point. Once the breaking point is reached, the subject can be refashioned.



It is hard to maintain a coherent sense of identity when you are on the verge of a nervous break down, let alone in the MIDST of one or BEYOND

The goal is not only to DESTROY the subject’s old identity but to make him FLEE and desire to escape it

*Warning* – Watch for Apathy – Apathy is an indicator that the programmer should watch for – it suggests that the subject’s self esteem is being broken down. As persistent suffering begins to dominate an individual’s day to day life, they will often become apathetic as a defense mechanism. The danger is that apathy may lead to permanent physical/mental surrender that cannot be corrected. The subject may become “Irretrievably Lost”. A balance of affects on the part of the programmer is necessary to achieve the correct degree of push/pull.

Breaking and Beyond: At this point, the subject has no idea who they are or what is going on. The programmer can use this opportunity to encourage a complete “conversation” that will save the subject from their desolation.

@ this point the subject is ready to make significant value system adjustments

(Note that this is an AUTOMATIC process, not VOLUNTARY – subject has by now lost their ability to be critical.)

Once the subject has reached their emotional breaking point, the programmer/handler will come back and shower them with kindness / affection , which the subject will respond to with desperation to be saved from their state of confusion and despondence. In this way, the “TRAUMA BOND” is solidified and deepened and the operational “VALUE” system is also altered according to the programmer’s preferences.

IV LOGISTICS OF SITES , PROGRAMMERS & SESSIONS

Before a subject can be programmed, authorization for programming must be obtained. The extent of the programming to be administered and the amount of coercion/deception that are considered acceptable during the process are also determined in this stage.

A Note About Programming Sites

Here is an interesting comparison between traditional physical programming environments and virtual ones. The mind can be located in the physical world externally, but “detained” in the virtual environment in every sense that counts, and that is important to the programming process. Consciousness can be ‘contained’ in the digital environment even while the subject is physically in the same environment as he or she was prior to the programming.

Most of the available documentation about mind control is terribly outdated and a lot of it was written several decades prior to the current state of technology. There are disadvantages to the “digital” programming site; since it is not a “Total” institution, the subject is left in the company of family of and friends who may be supportive. However, the psychological goals of the “digital” programming site are to discourage affiliation with outsiders to the extent that physical detention would not be significantly more effective, because behaviors of avoidance and paranoia are encouraged and facilitated to the extent that the subject avoids these potential support systems of his own accord.

There are other advantages to a digital programming site. It’s considerably more economically feasible, and if addictive patterns are deeply rooted and established in the subject’s habits, they can be subject to constant reinforcement of programming. They are “present” consciously in the “digital site” to a psychological extent that, when mixed with confusion/disorientation/identity degradation and trauma tactics, can achieve the same or even greater degrees of programming impact. Even though the “sustained” presence of the mind in the digital arena is less intense then the physical detention center, the reduction in intensity is compensated with the increase in exposure.

That is, with a physical detention center, a subject needs to be released eventually. But the “containment” experienced by a digital site can persist indefinitely, and because the brain is very poor at making clear differentiations between the significance of cyber events and the significance of face to face interaction, often very slightly moderated techniques will work just as well for programmers in the digital realm, particularly when a programmer is well versed on taking advantage on the “cognitive blindspots” unique to the internet environment.

The mind is not a representation of the physical external world. Rather, our conscious existence is mediated by the inner world we experience internally, regardless of what’s going on outside of us. The same environment can look very different depending on whether you are a trucker passing through a town in transit or it is the hometown where you grew up and graduated high school. There is no physical difference between these spaces in the physical world. Rather, it is the mental representation of these environments that is altered. If you are constantly “plugged in” and you spend the majority of your conscious existence online, you are in a true psychological sense, a “cyborg”. So long as that world exists for you in the abstract sense of gaining your conscious waking mind’s attention, it is capable of influence and moderating your personality and sense of self no less then any physical environment. Likewise, a skilled digital programmer will be just as effective as a face to face programmer at instigating programming strategies.

The structure of the digital programming site also invites it to serve as a 24/7 reinforcement, because different individuals and timezones can take over duties on shifts. Thus while it has less “immediate” impact, it has greater “sustain” and should by NO means should we discount the programming potential of the digital site. This is a very new topic however, and more research should be pursued in this arena to measure operational differences between these environments .

PROGRAMMERS I

Generally you will find a minimum of two programmers working with any particular subject. One will be designated “Lead” Programmer and the other as “Wing” Programmer (functioning as an assistant).

The rule calling for a minimum of two programmers per subject is in order to ensure that the programmers keep an eye on one another
If one programmer is too severe or two lenient, the other will step in and make up the difference

Also, having a pair of programmers ensures that if one develops to close an emotional investment in the subject his partner will speak up/recognize it. Overstepping such emotional boundaries is typically harder to recognize with oneself then it is to recognize with others.

Specific Purpose: before programming begins, PROGRAMMER ought to have clear objectives/programming goals to plan towards.

Things that should be planned in advance by programmers: Session codes, triggers for parts/alters, session outlines and programming goals for specific sessions, timeline of programming sessions and scheduling.

Planning in advance means that proper preparation can be made, and contingency plans considered in case a subject is resistant to some approaches/strategies initially planned by PROGRAMMERS.

Preliminary Psychological Analysis:
Having a psychological outline of the subject for a programmer to look at in advance can greatly aid in the process of planning the programming sessions and the ideal strategies to be used with a particular subject. A good programmer will cater the goals and approach of the programming to match the individual subject. A working knowledge of the subject’s current values and operative belief systems and their dominant sensory representational system can be of great benefit in the planning stages of programming.


PARTICIPANTS II

In one particular programming session, the amount of PROGRAMMERS present will vary based on the goals of that particular session and the current state of the relationship between various programmers and the subject. In general however, a given session may have anywhere from one programmer to a large team of four or more.

The size of the team may depend on the importance of the programming session’s goal – a high priority programming objective may have a more intensive team for that particular session. Another factor which determines the size of the team is the intensity of the subject’s resistance for that particular session. A particularly strong state of unforeseen or difficult to deal with resistance may require a more specific team.

As mentioned before, on average a programming session proceeds with one Lead programmer , on Wing programmer, and one subject.

The Programmer During the Session: a programmer must balance two opposing objectives simultaneously during the programming session…

The programmer must build a relationship with the subject and build
1) trust / rapport while simultaneously
2) Remaining objective / detached on a deeper level

That is – the programmer must be capable of holding both their connection to the subject and their detachment from the subject at the same time with equal sincerity

Poor/BAD programmers confuse the internal detachment from the subject with the programmer role-playing the affection entirely – ie, they believe that they must merely pretend to care about the subject and be invested in them. But this is not true, and often a subject will be able to eventually detect an insincere connection from the programmer and is unlikely to build rapport with the insincere programmer.

The affection should not be “an act”. Rather, to be persuasive, the sympathy and anger a programmer directs towards a subject ought to be genuine, however, it must not impede the programmer’s ability to, on a deeper level, apply precise, unaffected programming on the subject.

Changes in Programmers:

If a programmer becomes too emotionally involved in the subject they should remove themselves from their position or report their emotional state so that changes can be made if need be

For most sessions, the focus of the first part is predominately concerned with developing the relationship between a particular programmer and a subject.

This is considered to be even more important then eliciting information from the subject, so the disadvantages of changing programmers is obvious

Every time a programmer is changed, the process of building rapport and a relationship between the subject and programmer must be restarted from scratch

This, when a “CHIEF PROGRAMMER” is assigned they should ideally be with the subject until programming is over

Session Timing: Resistant subjects should be subject to unpredictable programming schedules so they don’t ever know when to expect attention from the programmer or how long isolation will persist. This state of uncertainty increases tension and is likely to increase compliance in the resistant subject.

Session Content: During the session, PROGRAMMER is engaged in the following with subject:
trauma techniques
scripting
coding
fracturing of psyche

END OF PROGRAMMING: Successful programming involves two key processes:

1) regression of the subject


2) provision of an acceptable ending

The isolation of the subject imposed by handlers to prevent the subject from forming real relationships with outsiders needs to be maintained even after programming goals have been concluded.

The bond/relationship between programmer/handler and subject needs to be maintained for purposes of upholding the programming as well.

This is actually one distinct advantage of the digital over the physical programming site. Of course , there is nothing to preclude both sites from being used on a particular subject depending on the plan / goals of programmers.

(See also; some common MC terms here:
Thread: Handlers & Programmers: How They Do What They Do (Page 4)
)
(this is just something different but related)
Thread: Handlers & Programmers: How They Do What They Do (Page 4)

Is this page still up?

compelling