WORTH SHARING - For those who think Biden has it in the bag PLEASE READ.

You have to got to be high. Explain how The Donald is trying to protect the Constitution? I doubt he knows much of that document, except perhaps the 5th Amendment. Seems to me he's more interested in making a mockery of it, or in finding loopholes through which he can squeeze his fat, orange ass.

You Trumptards keep equating patriotism with supporting Trump, and preserving and protecting the Constitution with supporting Trump. How did this fat fuck sell you on this? I can be a patriot and hate Trump. I can support and defend the Constitution and hate Trump. In fact, that makes more sense to me than your blind following of, as the OP said, this used car salesman.

What’s sad is you might have to shoot your stupid, communist grandson.

ANd if we do that Trump will be convicted of Treason.

Just sayin'

What’s sad is you might have to shoot your stupid, communist grandson.

My daughter tried to support trump on an issue at school,short storie within 6 months she had to change schools she went from honor roll to being singled out for cheating when all the kids help each.not to mention everyone boy and girl picked on her.

ANd if we do that Trump will be convicted of Treason.

Just sayin'

I'm so sorry you all went through that.

It takes a lot of courage to exercise freedom of speech now adays. Tell your daughter I'm very very proud of her courage.

So you say Trump is quite clever and is exposing a real problem, but you don't support him (or Biden) because of optics?

Gonna get hate from both sides for this but as my depression area share cropping father told me "If you find yourself standing alone for what you believe, you're either crazy, a liar or telling the truth."

Not a Trump fan, comes across like a used car salesman.
Not a Biden fan, comes across like a pedo uncle.
Hate materialism, it rots your soul.
Hate communism, it fills hearts with envy, bitterness and malice for your neighbors and your nation.
Hate nihilism in any and all forms, it spits in the Creators face.
Love and respect the US Constitution and the God given liberties it protects.
Love Jesus.

Had a conversation with my 20 year old grandson yesterday on Facebook. He posted about the Milwaukee recount and how Biden got more votes the second time around, and how much it makes Trump and his cronies look like idiots. My reply?

The point of the recount was never to gain votes, but to bring into question the integrity/accuracy of the process. Trump's team won that fight, the left doesn't see it, and surprisingly the right doesn't seem to see it either. Biden gained 257 votes and Trump added 125. Think about that for a second. 382 votes were missed, or about .1% of the total vote count (remember that number). Now time for some lawspeak:

[link to www.votersunite.org]

Federal law mandates that voting systems meet a very stringent standard for accuracy in
counting votes. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), Section 301(a)(5) states:

The error rate of the voting system in counting ballots … shall comply with the error rate
standards established under section 3.2.1 of the voting systems standards issued by the
Federal Election Commission which are in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

The error rate standard referenced in the law is “a target error rate of no more than one
in 10,000,000 ballot positions, with a maximum acceptable error rate in the test process
of one in 500,000 ballot positions.”3 A “ballot position,” also called “vote position” is
any choice presented to the voter, such as a single candidate in a contest or a single
response to an issue.

For example, a ballot with 10 contests and 3 candidates in each
contest would have 30 vote positions.

While the maximum legal error rate of 0.00001% may be unrealistic, it is law. However,
it is rare that any officials analyze the error rate of a voting system used in a real
election. So, for practical purposes, the error rate allowed for the test process is the
acceptable rate – 0.0002% – still a very high standard of accuracy. Testing properly to
such a high standard would be extremely time consuming.


So all Trump had to do, according to the HAVA act of 2002, was prove that the error rate of Milwaukee was greater than 0.00013% (which is .00001% x the 13 ballot positions on the Milwaukee ballot).

So. Not a Trump fan, not a Biden fan, but this HELPS Trumps case...a whole wheelbarrow full.

ANd if we do that Trump will be convicted of Treason.

Just sayin'

Just the thought of 'in the bag' is chilling to Trump.


>>> "President Donald Trump called Fox News "virtually unwatchable" on Saturday, and pointed his followers to instead watch conservative media outlets One America News Network (OANN) and Newsmax."
[link to www.msn.com (secure)]

except for the part where Trump called the election rigged in 2016 and became president and then took no actions to prevent it from happening next time. He apparently wanted it to be rigged and talked about it for all these long years when he was in a position to do something.

That is the part that causes me to believe it is not rigged, that is just the term used by the Shyster in charge to manipulate people in the way he does incessantly, playing upon their patriotism while abusing everyone in earshot.

All your points about margin of error should be discussed by congress but it has nothing to do with trump or biden.

Like your style. Never a Joe fan here. Not much of Trump fan either but I believe Trump is less hurtful than Joe to our country now. I usually stand alone most of the time because I’m a crazy lying truth teller. I only hate one thing. Ok. Two. The RNC and the DNC. I keep hoping more than one of us will walk away. But even independents talk about picking one of the two. Not only are those two organizations solely responsible for our current paradigm but those who are members and those who vote for them are equally culpable in our nations division. Even if you voted for Trump this election and he loses, you’re still one of the sheep. Gladly picking between one of THEIR two choices. Accepting this is also my concern. No one questions why it’s Trump or Biden or HRC or whomever they put up. Why is it that they never let us choose from intelligent people? Or loving people? Or diplomats? Or people who are apolitical? Having a leader beholden to the people instead of party would be a nice change.

Nope. Americans have accepted the con, accepted spoon fed hate over love. Accepted civil war over civil. Anyone using the TARD addition to a word, trumptard or libtard, just shows that they are low in IQ with no quality participation in the subject. Accepted the two party system so hard, they gladly hate the other side. It’s in our intelligence agencies. Our military. Our sports. Everyone clamoring for the republicans/democrats or against. So hard for me to fathom. Maybe I pegged you wrong so I’m still alone, that’s ok, I’m used to it.

The land of the free. If:
1. You think freedom is only two choices.
2. You think making laws barring or limiting new parties is freedom.
3. You think people from Harvard and Yale know more than you on how to lead you is freedom.
4. You think cnn, Fox, abc, cbs, NYT or whomever are the problem and not people thinking for themselves or changing the channel is freedom.
5. You think passing laws to tell people what to do with their lives is freedom.
6. You think laws against others than you are freedom.
7. You think that locking people up for non violent crimes is freedom.
8. You think non Americans have the same or more rights than Americans is freedom.
9. You think finding the biggest idiots to run for office is freedom.

We are so used to it, we don’t even see it anymore.

You have to got to be high. Explain how The Donald is trying to protect the Constitution? I doubt he knows much of that document, except perhaps the 5th Amendment. Seems to me he's more interested in making a mockery of it, or in finding loopholes through which he can squeeze his fat, orange ass.

You Trumptards keep equating patriotism with supporting Trump, and preserving and protecting the Constitution with supporting Trump. How did this fat fuck sell you on this? I can be a patriot and hate Trump. I can support and defend the Constitution and hate Trump. In fact, that makes more sense to me than your blind following of, as the OP said, this used car salesman.

What’s sad is you might have to shoot your stupid, communist grandson.

For someone to state that they would have to shoot their 20 year old communist grandson reveals the utter depravity of the reactionary right wing republican sub-class. They are so far behind in the evolutionary time-scale that you would think they have a surplus of Neanderthal DNA in their genes and that their ancestors were cave man Troglodytes whose origins can be traced to the Caucasus Mountains. These republicans, who by the way do not represent the majority of God-fearing decent hard-working conservative folk, are the backward regressive remnants of the scum of the earth who are now being relegated to the dustbins and dumpsters of historical garbage. Good riddance to really bad stinking rubbish.

Once again, no substance in your argument. Orange man bad would have been just as good as what you just said.

What un-constitutional things has he done?

Give us specifics please.

More excellent information.

For someone to state that they would have to shoot their 20 year old communist grandson reveals the utter depravity of the reactionary right wing republican sub-class. They are so far behind in the evolutionary time-scale that you would think they have a surplus of Neanderthal DNA in their genes and that their ancestors were cave man Troglodytes whose origins can be traced to the Caucasus Mountains. These republicans, who by the way do not represent the majority of God-fearing decent hard-working conservative folk, are the backward regressive remnants of the scum of the earth who are now being relegated to the dustbins and dumpsters of historical garbage. Good riddance to really bad stinking rubbish.

You have to got to be high. Explain how The Donald is trying to protect the Constitution? I doubt he knows much of that document, except perhaps the 5th Amendment. Seems to me he's more interested in making a mockery of it, or in finding loopholes through which he can squeeze his fat, orange ass.

You Trumptards keep equating patriotism with supporting Trump, and preserving and protecting the Constitution with supporting Trump. How did this fat fuck sell you on this? I can be a patriot and hate Trump. I can support and defend the Constitution and hate Trump. In fact, that makes more sense to me than your blind following of, as the OP said, this used car salesman.

EVERYBODY is waiting for the VOTER fraud evidence including the COURTS

You have to got to be high. Explain how The Donald is trying to protect the Constitution? I doubt he knows much of that document, except perhaps the 5th Amendment. Seems to me he's more interested in making a mockery of it, or in finding loopholes through which he can squeeze his fat, orange ass.

You Trumptards keep equating patriotism with supporting Trump, and preserving and protecting the Constitution with supporting Trump. How did this fat fuck sell you on this? I can be a patriot and hate Trump. I can support and defend the Constitution and hate Trump. In fact, that makes more sense to me than your blind following of, as the OP said, this used car salesman.