Coney-Barret FLEES trafficking question with "feewings!"

Democrats calling out the same sketchy Haitian adoptions that the Clintons were responsible for.

So dumb, this "blame them for what I did" mentality.

Joe the Plumber sees right through it by now.

Both sides do that. It's why everyone won't stop and hold their own party responsible and up to the standard of integrity, like mature adults, regardless of what the "other guy" did.

Everyone who isn't highly critical of and willing to see the corruption IN THEIR OWN PARTY, everyone who perpetuates and cheers on this competition to the bottom to blame each other for being "worse" than what ever dumb shit they or their party members just did ... EVERYONE who participates like this is complicit in the ruination of this nation.

The childish finger pointing has to stop. Look at yourself. If you can't look at yourself, look at all the disarray the people YOU support cause and start there. Change doesn't come by fighting the "other." It comes by ruthlessly insisting on the integrity of anything that you support by way of it's own virtue.

Attacking her kids is going to blow up in a dramatic fashion right in the Democrats face. Anybody who has been through the adoption process knows how difficult every step of the way is. Starting with an FBI background check, working through the paperwork in the state or country where the adopted child is coming from, getting an interstate or international compact agreement in place to allow transfer of the child, and getting an adoption tax payer ID number ATIN which is required before you can get a Social Security number for the adopted child. And every step of the way there will be a massive paper trail of checks being written to everyone and their brother who has their hand in your pocket and a microscope up your ass. Politicians who know nothing of this process should not try to speak intelligently about it. But that’s never stopped him before.

Except they ARE the same and you are a fraud and a hypocrite, gamely defending a "pretty face" you like because "feewings" -

many repubs only sit in our shade because their friends are too much. For now, its the condition but it still gets back to "quality in species" and I was never one of those nobles who thought "pet humans" for spoiled ladies was "oh well?" - most do end up "Phyllis wheatly"s when the cute wears off.

Anyway, can't blame the DUMB BEASTS when they are right....

Tree-sevety-five for all those empty, meaningless words that do not even apply to that woman, her friends or anybody but "people".
She was rubber stamped right through and could have declared em as 2 sacks of bagels.

(What cannot stand in its own light is weak and falls away normal from not being up to the bar. "Crying kavanaugh" was lame enough.)

Thems fighting words saying someone is as bad as a LibTard.
Even though most of them are.

The whole topic is fuckery. Not one of those that are so adamantly questioning these adoptions gave one fuck two weeks ago.

Your anger over it makes it clear you're one of them.

Touching this third rail will be catastrophic for Democrats. Personally, I don’t want to see her kids hurt by this, it is not fair to them. Being an adopted person is difficult enough as it is.. However, if Democrats do decide to pursue this it will be delicious to watch us explode in their faces.

If this is the best they can do to discredit the woman, she will sail through the process. Even if Trump loses in November he will have shaped the court for the next 40 years, I will put that in the win column.

Wow !!!
This post is a new low even for Godlike !!!

Its well documented democrat politicians and leftists pushed HARD for people to adopt Haitian orphans.

It must be depressing for leftists to know the SC will solidly lean right for decades.

FYOP.

The article you link to in no way addresses any official documentation regarding the adoptions.

You say it, and then that makes it so?

YOU are the missing tree fiddy in this thread.