BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED INTO ITS OWN FOOT PRINT

don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity.

I’ve got no theories for you... but here’s some fact dots for you to connect... hopefully you’ll see the pattern....:

On September 10, 2001, then U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed that his department was unable to account for roughly $2.3 trillion worth of transactions. The next day, the U.S. sustained the terrorist attacks that changed the world, and this startling revelation was forgotten.

The War on Waste:

[link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)]




Last Edited by Bad Pattern on 09/11/2020 12:39 PM

This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing.

There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires.

It is believed that building 7 had the contract agreements, or judgement, of the case of the "Dragon Family vs The Federal Reserve" in which the "Dragon Family" alleges that the FedRes swindled them out of oodles of physical gold in exchange for 60 year Treasury Bonds that turned out to be worthless. The Federal Reserve was supposed to safeguard the gold or use it to improve life in 3rd world countries but that never came to pass.

The Federal Reserve was taken to International Court in The Hague in which judgement was in favor of the Dragon Family and the FedRes was ordered to return the gold by September 12, 2001 but we all know what happened the day before. The physical gold was alleged to be under Towers 1 & 2 whilst the documents related to the gold/bond exchange & court case etc were to be housed in Building 7.

It's curious to see how Donald Rumsfeld went on TV on the 10th to report several trillion dollars having been disappeared into thin air just before the attacks on the 11th and before the gold return deadline on the 12th.

If y’all visit the YT site for the above video, do NOT click on the site listed in the description that’s : building what dot org... it’s a total ChiCom clickbait malware site disguised as an ecig site, all in Mandarin writing.

God Bless

Buildings want to collapse. That is all I can figure. They are made to demolish themselves.

Incredible.

If the story about the added “foam insulation” prior to the attacks is true...
occums razor would lean toward that the so called “insulation” had secret flammable ingredients...

there was no melting. the steel was yellow hot,
and with 100s of tons per square foot pressure
on that one floor that was burning, key structural members
started bending and then the cooler brittle steel and welds
and bolts start breaking,
and then it started pancaking when section above
collapsing onto that burning floor, and then everything started pancaking.
That's called Pancaking.

You partially stole my thread from earlier in the morning :(
Did you see it ? It was called WTC 7 building about the plane

Here's a very recent interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. I think a lot of it is about Building 7 and that it was not brought down by fire. BUILDING 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN.

Yes, there was molten iron microspheres throughout the WTC dust, the reaction product of the nanothermite incendiary that brought the towers down.

[link to www.ae911truth.org (secure)]

I don't always like to fixate over "facts" because we don't always have access to the best info. A lot is hidden from us or destroyed. I frequently prefer to look at concepts or the "common sense" of things - is this REALLY how this event would have been done or how these participants would have accomplished it?

Very telling in this case. Why would 19 Muslim terrorists sworn to fight the US & with histories supporting this (allegedly) attack a target at 8:46 AM BEFORE THE WORKING DAY EVEN STARTS?

In attacking at that time they only killed about 3000 people. If they had waited until...say...after lunch...with workers and visitors to the Towers they might have killed as many as 50,000. (that's been estimated). Certainly many multiples of 3,000.

Terrorists would NOT pick a large target at a time with MINIMAL CASUALTIES. BUT MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE PEOPLE WOULD. That is WHY they picked 8:46 AM BEFORE THE WORKING DAY STARTED. To have the smallest number of civilian casualties for this INSIDE JOB.

Our own people in charge would not kill 3,000 Americans? OF COURSE THEY WOULD. They've killed many many many times that in foreign wars.

You need glasses,

I feel like 3000 trained architects know more than AC's. And they are all saying the event was controlled.

So yeah. After watching that, I believe that the presence of nanothermite in massive quantities of the dust at the WTC site means the buildings were brought down using nanothermite.

[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]

A&E for 911 Truth have been pushing their lame explanations for years while sucking money from the foolish sheep who believe that 911 was an inside job. Sad really, and a form of sedition.

Once upon a time, freshman year curriculum for all engineering disciplines included calculus, physics, chemistry, structural analysis, thermodynamics and properties/strengths of materials.
Anyone who didn't flunk those courses can use what they learned to understand why the official story is impossible... unless they are afraid to admit it. I've had many discussions about the official story with engineers and the basic agreement is the official story is not possible based on what they learned in school.
Whatever sort of fools (probably mostly bots) come here talking NIST report obviously haven't read it or they would know how full of holes it is from an engineering perspective. Criminals can create fake reports just like they can counterfeit currency.

OK, hippie

This is why AC shit heads like you get banned...

So what exactly do you disagree with the NIST Report as to why B7 collapse. After reading it , it make complete sense compared to the nano-thermate control demo nonsense.

Donald Rumsfled is the smoking gun

when asked about WTC 7 he said "i have no idea what you are talking about"

The idea that the pancake theory makes no sense, is especially obvious once you realize that none of these buildings actually failed in a pancake style of collapse.

These 911 shills get dumber each and every year.

Shills gaslight. It is all they have.

The architect in that video gives clear reasons why none of the buildings could have fallen as they did. He talks about the massive amount of steel PROJECTED up to 600 feet away on the North Tower, which means the steel wasnt crushing the building, and how the concrete was pulverized into mist. He shows the damn squibs blowing out as it comes down, FAR below where the building is falling apart. It is obvious it was blown apart from inside.

And he shows proof of nano thermite throughout all the wreckage. Steel beams with their ends evaporated.

Shills gaslight. That is all they can do.

Yep. Plus everyone knows that it's pointless and moot now, America is about to come down even faster than WT7 did.

9/11 was our warning, and America did next to nothing with it.

Seriously?! Isn't it obvious? The War on Terror is a fucking blank check.

A non-specific war with non-specific objectives against a non-specific enemy in a non-specific theater using non-specific tactics and assets in non-specific ways. What's not to gain by such an action if you're a warhawk? Throw in the Patriot Act and these freaks are jizzing in their pants from power OD.

Last Edited by Festus J. Hoggbottom, III on 09/11/2020 02:26 PM

[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]
A&E for 911truth are con men taking money from "Truthers" for years. No different that a magicians trick of making you look the other way so that you believe his trick is real. If you believe in Gage and his gang of con-men then you deserve to have your money taken from you for not having a BS meter working when someone wants you to believe in utter BS.

You obviously are unaware what was supposed to be in that building.
All of 9/11 was to cover up what was stolen from there.
All of it.

Wrap your head around that...

Still waiting for an answer. Sound more like crickets to me.

Trump is simply another person in a long line of persons preventing the truth of 9/11 from the light of day.