BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED INTO ITS OWN FOOT PRINT

Bdg. 7 is the only suspicious thing about 9/11.
and that's suspicion enough.

It was an obvious controlled demolition, therefore it stands to reason all of them were destroyed by in a similar way.

19 years later and you all still too pussy to change your corrupt goVernment. Keep voting those who still acknowledge the official story. You are your own worst enemy.

Stop complaining about 9/11 unless you gonna do something about it. It’s not about awareness anymore. It’s about action. Everyone already knows it was an inside job

NIST report shows that Bldg 7 fell in free fall for 2.25s. The only way to get that to happen was to blow out using shaped charges the pillar referred to as C17 in the parking garage.

Absolutely. People get so caught up in the wow factor of it all. The sensational. It doesn't matter so much as how 911 was pulled off as who benefited almost immediately, and how broad sweeping changes were made under the guise of security and freedom, but we were too distracted to think it through.

One analogy I can think of is the movie Die Hard. Remember, in the end it was just an elaborate robbery.

...

Five stars op great thread and thank you to whoever used up the green Karma to pin this...

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Oh theres a hell of a lot more than that! But good try!

Miscalculated

A plane should have hit it

Those explosives weren’t set that day after the twin towers were hit.

Did you just figured this shit out?

It has been 19 years goddammit.

How can you not already know this

[link to www.metabunk.org (secure)]

Most of you GLP members have not even read any of the NIST Report for the reason B7 collapse. So with the help of Mick West here is the complete explaination. Maybe after reading this you will realize that you were wrong all these years.

While your there, can you pass me a copy of the Warren commission? I need the true story of what happened to Kennedy...

One of the goals is always to have you begging for just a portion of your rights back. Just make it half normal again so I can feel good for a few minutes and not scared.

Please can I got to the beach or the lake, please?

Believe in something.
Even if it means abandoning all logic.

Just do it
[swoosh]

NIST are you fucking joking.....dont be an idiot.

Average Joe can not fathom that he might of been had. For Truthers just stick with what experts on both sides have explained about 9-11. When you start talking about holograms and nuclear explosions you will lose factual investigation skills.

This is bare bones the best place to start on the subject with architects and engineers showing their doubts of the official story by NIST.

[link to www.ae911truth.org (secure)]

Here, let me show with this computer animation I made how this was caused by fire.

LOL.

It absolutely, most definitely was not a controlled demolition. Please stop with this silly crap.

Then stay ignorant in your little cowardly world with your fellow conspiracy sheep believing in utter BS.

OK, The planes caused it all. Then they declared war on Iraq and stopped them from trading oil for gold and installed a central bank.

f you are going to form an intellectually honest opinion on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 then by all means read the information provided by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and others. But intellectual honesty requires knowledge of other positions before you can reject them. At the very least you should start with the NIST WTC7 FAQ:
[link to www.nist.gov (secure)]

^This

September 11 attacks
Main article: September 11 attacks

Silverstein has said in interviews that he usually spent his mornings in breakfast meetings at Windows on the World on top of the World Trade Center North Tower, and with new tenants in the building. However, the morning of September 11, 2001, his wife insisted that he attend a medical appointment. Due to the appointment, he escaped almost certain death.[24]

All of the buildings at the World Trade Center, including buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, were destroyed or damaged beyond repair on September 11, 2001. After a protracted dispute with insurers over the amount of coverage available for rebuilding World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5, a series of court decisions determined that a maximum of $4.55 billion was payable and settlements were reached with the insurers in 2007.[25]
Insurance dispute

The insurance policies for World Trade Center buildings 1 WTC, 2 WTC, 4 WTC and 5 WTC had a collective face amount of $3.55 billion. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Silverstein sought to collect double the face amount (~$7.1 billion) on the basis that the two separate airplane strikes into two separate buildings constituted two occurrences within the meaning of the policies. The insurance companies took the opposite view, and the matter went to court. Based on differences in the definition of "occurrence" (the insurance policy term governing the amount of insurance) and uncertainties over which definition of "occurrence" applied, the court split the insurers into two groups for jury trials on the question of which definition of "occurrence" applied and whether the insurance contracts were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation or the "two occurrence" interpretation.

The first trial resulted in a verdict on April 29, 2004, that 10 of the insurers in this group were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation, so their liability was limited to the face value of those policies, and 3 insurers were added to the second trial group.[26][27] The jury was unable to reach a verdict on one insurer, Swiss Reinsurance, at that time, but did so several days later on May 3, 2004, finding that this company was also subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation.[28] Silverstein appealed the Swiss Re decision, but lost that appeal on October 19, 2006.[29] The second trial resulted in a verdict on December 6, 2004, that 9 insurers were subject to the "two occurrences" interpretation and, therefore, liable for a maximum of double the face value of those particular policies ($2.2 billion).[30] The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5.[31] An appraisal followed to determine the value of the insured loss.

The goal was that on that day, it was announced, on tv news, that WTC 7 was damaged and dangerous and had to come down. Yes it was intentionally demolished but it was no surprise and no mystery. If people didn't get that memo, please review local NYC area news reports from that day, I'd say around 4pm or so.
GOD BLESS AMERICA THEY DID NOT DEFEAT US THAT DAY WE ARE STILL THE MOST BAD-ASS AND THE BEST!

Also to divert attention from the missing trillions reported by defence secretary rumsfeld, just one day prior on 9 - 10.