Not sure what you favor in terms of non-flattering publicity about her true nature and background.

If you believe that legitimate issues by themselves concerning her not meeting Constitutional qualifications instead of also focusing on her lousy, corruptocratic liberalism are unbalanced and incomplete, I'll agree with you.

Sometimes I think even various non-liberals, including some legitimate conservatives, tend to be more har-de-har-ha focused on a public figure's shortcomings that have nothing to do with his or her leftism but everything to do with his looks, sexual history, speech patterns, race/ethnicity, personality.