"A fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans..."

Give me the short version. What freedoms do you get under this system that you don't have now?

It's sarcasm
We are getting ready to loose more rights in 2009 and beyond.

We are in big trouble.

What rights are we going to lose?

Re-read the op, and add 1+1.

I did. I added 1+1 and drew this conclusion.

The OP can't name a single right that we are about to lose. He is imagining things.

You can't name a single right that we are about to lose either. You are imagining things as well.

Hillary and Bill are both documented on multiple occasions as saying they want Americans disarmed.

Now, why would Hillary not trust the people with firearms?

And, why would anyone vote for someone that has no faith in her constituents?

That isn't true. As I said, you're imagining things.

Gun control/gun rights isn't even on the radar in this campaign.

Loss of rights is right! I got the following off a website while doing a search for something else:

FARM ANIMAL CHIP IMPLANTS

Implanted RFID tags are part of NAIS, which isn't going to go into effect till 2007/8 in the US. Tracking of animals won't cure or prevent BSE/Scrapie/E.Coli because it isn't intended to. It is intended only to *appear* to be Doing Something™ to the countries we export agricultural products to.

There are a number of reasons that NAIS is broken, defective and can never fulfil its publically stated mission. Starting with Revelations 13:16-17 - He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

Currently the tagging and registration is voluntary. Did you know that to "register" your farm that you have to give up your 4th Amendment right to search warrants? That every time an animal leaves, enters, is born or dies on your registered facility that you have to file electronically with NAIS? Or that NAIS is privatizing the database before it is even live?

ISO 11785 compliant implants start at $1.50 and go up. Only small farms have to use them. Large "farms" that keep critters in lots from birth to abattoir only have to serialize the lot, not the animals, so places that raise thousands of animals won't be paying $1.50/animal.

Sample Use Case:
- You raise cattle for the beef industry. Each calf when born requires tagging and notification for the USDA.

- You raise large amounts of cattle for the beef industry. Each calf requires registration, but no tagging as long as they stay in the same lots.

- You want to ride your horse to visit your family down the road. You must notify USDA when the horse leaves the registered "source" and when it arrives at the destination. You'll have to notify the USDA when it returns home. A filing fee must be paid for each leg of the journey.

- You take your horse out on the trail where it might comingle with other horses. You guessed it: notify and pay.

- Your kids raise sheep for 4H. They've already been tagged and registered. When you take them to the show/fair, you have to notify the USDA and pay the fees when you leave the farm and come back from the show.

- You raise sheep. They never leave your farm. You want to hire a stud to come visit to knock up your ewes. Now all your sheep must get RFID tagged.

- You raise quail and partridges for a local hunting club. You're out of business by 2009.

- You raise fish. Good luck tagging them with compliant rfid tags. You're out of business by 2009.

- You are Amish. Your religious beliefs prohibit you from obeying this law. Welcome to the tribulation.

- You've been farming since before time began. Now you must purchase a computer and internet service to comply with registration and reporting requirements. The USDA does not plan to begin notifying farmers that they are covered by the NAIS requirements until mid 2007, long after the comment period expires, and about 6 months before it becomes mandatory.

The claimed reason for creating NAIS is to cut down on E Coli, BSE and "animal bioterrorism." To eliminate E Coli infection of beef, all the industry would have to do is have the cattle graze on grass for the last 5 days before slaughter. Instead, many cattle stand knee deep in their own urine and feces in feed lots.

The US forbids 100% testing of cattle for BSE (Europe and Japan require 100% testing), and permits it only for visibly symptomatic animals. Since it takes 4-5 years for the symptoms to become visible in infected cattle, and most beef cattle are slaughtered before they reach 4 years old, the failure to be able to mitigate BSE in US beef supplies is obvious. There haven't been any incidents of "animal bioterrorism" that I've ever heard of. Foot and Mouth disease was eradicated in the US over 70 years ago.

None of the regulations can meet the stated requirements. This means that the regulations exist for some different reason than the stated ones. The general consensus in the farming community is that these regulations are being made to make the general public less fearful when contaminated meat comes from a packing plant. We must protect the profit margins of big-farming no matter how much it screws the public or the smaller farmer.

[link to globalguerrillas.typepad.com]
.

LOL, and Hillary would love to keep it that way.

OMG, we're going to lose our right to have our farm animals free of RFID chips. That is certainly worth a rewrite of the entire US Constitution.

you got it backwards...the Clintons will rewrite it...actually ignore it.

say hello to marxism in sheeps clothing

You don't read very well, do you? You missed the entire point of the NAIS regulations. Go back and read it slowly and carefully.
.

That's so right ET...she would be torn apart and caught in her lies...





^ don't you just hate it when Hillary's people enter into forums...