Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,020 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 568,094
Pageviews Today: 1,008,218Threads Today: 494Posts Today: 7,758
11:21 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Huge electromagnetic precurser ... just look at this map!
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
in order to see the map you have to take off the ..... in the link
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78659466


Can someone please imbed it for me? ...yeah they keep downgrading quakes too. They dont want you to know !
 Quoting: Apocalypse Girl


Why? It's just meaningless bullshit.

Nothing will happen.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78998996


Look guys, this is just pseudoscience.

Read this for real science - the researchers studied four years of GIM-TEC and found zero correlation with earthquakes:

A statistical study of global ionospheric map total electron content changes prior to occurrences of M ≥ 6.0 earthquakes during 2000-2014: GIM-TEC and earthquakes

There are many reports on the occurrence of anomalous changes in the ionosphere prior to large earthquakes. However, whether or not these changes are reliable precursors that could be useful for earthquake prediction is controversial within the scientific community. To test a possible statistical relationship between ionospheric disturbances and earthquakes, we compare changes in the total electron content (TEC) of the ionosphere with occurrences of M ≥ 6.0 earthquakes globally for 2000–2014. We use TEC data from the global ionosphere map (GIM) and an earthquake list declustered for aftershocks. For each earthquake, we look for anomalous changes in GIM-TEC within 2.5° latitude and 5.0° longitude of the earthquake location (the spatial resolution of GIM-TEC). Our analysis has not found any statistically significant changes in GIM-TEC prior to earthquakes.

Thus, we have found no evidence that would suggest that monitoring changes in GIM-TEC might be useful for predicting earthquakes.

[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78998996


4 years is not even the blink of an eye in geological terms. Get back with that study in 4 million years then we'll talk about your data.

The best indicator of earthquakes after all these years of scientist's studying how to predict them is still to check the paper for 'missing pets' ads. Always a run up on missing pets before a big one. They know it's coming and the run for the hills!

For now I'm bringing my tomato plants in though just in case.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP