Magnetosphere Watch!!!!! Something this way doomy comes??

"I don't know, but it's slowing down..."

"What?"

"It's. Slowing. Down."

:eddiebingo: :quaid1:

Good, it will make you dumber and easier to own.

Alright, you got an obvious chip on your shoulder so I'll bite.

You're golden star achievement seems to be tracking the moon's rotation. Congratulations, you've managed to track the largest celestial object in the sky with the most uniform of rotation using modern technology. You've accomplished what others have done in the past using nothing more than a clay pendulum. Hats off to you.

I'm sure you are far too super smart to get drawn into a discussion about the moon using observable facts; such a the moon is either hollow or honeycombed; or that the gravity around the moon is incredibly inconsistent; or that the moon shouldn't even be where it is according to our current understanding of celestial physics. I'm sure any such discussion would be immediately dismissed by you as DK pseudo fringe science because the denial of openly observable facts is what modern science has been reduced to.

No, you much rather sit on your high horse using computing models other people built, that you've just inherited or at best tweaked, and used it to proclaim yourself king of the intellectual castle in this small corner of the internet.

Am I taking away from your technical prowess? No. You clearly have skills in programming and other areas that allow you to do this. So why am I having a go at you? Because you dismiss others you think below you, and you do it in the way most of you normie science geeks do, you blind yourselves to observable evidence and ignore it in favour of models that are full of holes but are so entrenched by the academic authorities that you use their authority to lamblast others who can challenge those models with observable facts. You're the problem with modern science. How does someone being banned from YouTube make them wrong? It doesn't. Something something appeal to authority fallacy. Which I'm sure you'd be all to keen to throw in someone's face in another argument, just not when it's you using it. You refuse to actually try and understand what it is you are studying, you'd rather just use tools and theorems already built that you imbue with sacrosanct value, never looking at what's underneath the hood. That's what I mean when I ask you about causes as opposed to effects.

You can observe effects. Good for you. You use modern computing algorithms, others can use a pendulum made of clay. Do you understand the cause of the effect you're observing? Absolutely not. Your accuracy comes from the calibre of your tools, not the depths of your understand. There is a world of difference there.

That's how these online "experts" function. Always dodging real questions, while clinging to parts of your comments and calling you names based on that.

Here's the perfect description for this from a mental health coach:

"A lot of them actually work in the helping, teaching, and medical fields or pretend to be experts and intellectuals on social media. Some of them are really smart, eloquent, and popular, which makes their statements more believable to an unaware audience.

They can learn all these fancy terms and phrases, yet they often don’t understand or even care about how to apply them correctly."

[link to blogs.psychcentral.com (secure)]

careful with such brazen posts,
dr shill will scrub it and ban yo ass
friend

What is the big blue circle?

[link to ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov (secure)]

Take a look at this. My heart was flip flopping so I looked at this and said, yep, there it is. We are taking bad hits right now. Hang in there everyone, I’m sure it will correct itself soon.

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

I'm going to post links to explain what's going on. You can take it or leave it...but this is your answer.


[link to spaceweather.com (secure)]


Look on the left hand column of the page and scroll down to "Oulu neutron counts".

You will see that it says "very high" in RED.

Look under that for the word "explanation" in BLUE.

Click on that and it will be explained. This is your answer.

Extreme High Cosmic Ray counts over Rome

[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]

.