They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently....

Users Online Now: 1,600 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 132,985
Pageviews Today: 180,868	Threads Today: 84	Posts Today: 760
01:30 AM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently.....
learn_the_truth666 Offer Upgrade User ID: 78514998 United States 03/19/2020 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently..... [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

Anonymous Coward User ID: 45875545 United Kingdom 03/19/2020 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently..... Because not was
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45875545 United Kingdom 03/19/2020 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently..... *it
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72711218 United States 03/19/2020 07:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently..... This is SARS2 idiots

learn_the_truth666 (OP) User ID: 78514998 United States 03/19/2020 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: They called SARS a " novel coronavirus " back in 2003 apparently..... The point is it isn't new and isn't worth crashing the economy over. There's more going on behind the iron curtain.
Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP