Notes from an 'Alternate Universe': The Return of the Blue Kachina

I think it’s okay to wear a mask, as a sign of diplomacy. We nod good biddance, riddance and adieu - we bid well faring - to the ones who split in path from us.

We do not integrate with the world. The world integrates with us.

For we are not animals. We are the designers.

We build tolerance to that with which we wish to integrate.

Probably

How many different perspectives are there?

What would I have?






What is the ultimate outcome?

Obviously, in my core, I’m a chaos magnet lol

Still. Either way. It’s an amazing word of art.

Did I miss that part?
You suggest the same.

You’re welcome :)

Red

From 12:07:
"by the way, I'm a prepper, but I am a community prepper".

I like this guy's style.

Sure, sure. Then do you not believe in a life energy? Be that chi/orgone/vril/ki/vitality/prana/mana/od?

Why does observation effect matter?

What do you make of Krilian photography?

Can you sprinkle some fairy dust my direction to help me acquire this building I want to restore?

I'm glad it helps. It would also help if it strengthened your butt and saves your resolve.


Order and chaos are needed to reach criticality.

If you'd like, refer to Per Bak.


:)

I'm glad you didn't say "0 dimensional requirements".

Yes, it is irrelevant to it.

"Time" is what we refer to as the dimension of space. But overall, they're interpretations of more fundamental expressions.

The pattern is the interplay of Chaos and Order, what could be interpreted as electricity and magnetism.


There are trillions of such in a human body, if that is what you're referring to. A 'new environment' could be anything from thoughts to geographical space to proximity to drops of rain. All effect the organism, but virii are not inherently harmful. We need them to survive.


Could you clarify this question?


:)

Okay thanks for empty additions, for interacting's sake? You can say it.

I C U Az: That which interacts with logic, resulting in the lowering of transparency of useful secrets.

I wont say it's useless though. Just, disappointing as has become the usual.

Hello Chaol. This is my first time posting since I stumbled on these threads and started reading them too many months ago. Nice work you’ve done here. Nice work hiding it in plain sight too as I’m guessing you know that a person interprets new information in relation with what information/knowledge/grammar they previously had. I find it Funny that people don’t really ask for definitions of words. Or at least for YOUR definition of the words you use.
I read through all the threads, I think. Everything.
I must say, you’re a terrible teacher to most people I see comment on these threads. By terrible, I mean you suck at it. Hell, I’ve noticed several people who have been active here for what appears to be years and they still do not get or understand exactly what ‘they’ are. Perhaps the problem lies in your use of the word ‘perspective’ lol. I also encountered such problems when discussing it with some friends of mine. Maybe ‘perception’ works better? Doesn’t really matter if anyone knows or not anyway, as long as it’s being used.
So thank ‘you’ , I guess.
Also, I’ve had my ‘beliefs’ (more like things I knew or information I had. I don’t believe anything as I think belief is irrelevant) shattered and disproven more times than I can count due to my own doing. I am yet to find fallacies in Chaol’s message and I’m highly interested in shattering them or maybe looking deeper into it (for my own entertainment) so if anyone can, please go ahead. Chaol included.
Or, Is this the base-level?

Hi. Thanks for your message :)


You've read it all, so you know the intention is not to teach ;)

If that was the case these threads would be different.


Thank you for the suggestion. The words are chosen carefully, however. Most of the time lol


Feel free to try to shatter the message. There are plenty of weak points. But again, it's more of a record of development rather than a message. Or perhaps even an illustration of how very human we are.

Political as ever,
Taking credit for what works,
Shirking responsibility for what goes wrong.

And of course,
To convince you that you are the one who wanted it,
Asked for it,
Did it your self - to your self,

The scape goat.

Because 'unity of all things' is convenient when someone needs to take the blame.

Isn't that right....chaol?

I see. I personally think intention changes over time, doesn’t it? I’m curious as to what your current/immediate intention is. Care to tell?

As has been said on these threads for over 10 years, there is no message. It's for my own personal benefit, though others may find some meaning if they'd like. It's the open illustration of a personal process that also helps me to become more of who and what I really am.

The "notes" are to myself. The website(s) are my own record, like someone putting an inspirational thought or a grocery list on the refrigerator.

The threads are meant to find patterns in the randomness, and there is no better place for such robust randomness in English than GLP. The back and forth between various aspects (everyone here) are essential to the process.

In return for helping the primary purpose ("personal growth" I suppose it could be said) you may get what appears to be a message (or entertaining BS, if it's looked at in that way).

Hope this clarifies it some.

I should add, however, that if there is any such "message" it is only the Law that I have on the website. But this is more for myself than anyone else, to see it externally so to speak. Others may benefit from this, of course.

All too often, the messenger gets confused with the message. Yes, it would have been easier to have a "message" but it most likely would have resulted in the same dramas where the message was lost.

Could you please rephrase this?

Last Edited by Eruterio on 08/28/2021 09:34 PM

If the personal growth is what it's all about, no message being the case, the messenger is the message if there would be one.

Thus, the messenger is not being confused with the message. The messenger is confused.

And, ultimately, not a messenger.

Thank you for temporarily alleviating the endless boredom with such puzzles as Ec.

(Though it might've been more fun to figure out the DNA connection without advice.)

May good fortune find you where you deserve it least.

May your credit be clean.

~Adios

(vroom vroom, escape velocity) (toot toot, mindful gas)

DNA connection? What is that?

IDK who you are or why you're exalting me in your perspective...nonethemore I will answer.

The primary reference node begins at the following quotes (you can click the little white square image to "jump" to those nodes in the thread from prior moments...all the way back to the first mention of DNA in relation to Ec linguage.)

From 2011 and 2011 in retromotion:




And then in the thread that used to be title "Help! I have an IQ of 300+infinite" (paraphrased) as was produced and developed by a one named Kore I had asked about DNA and the question was evaded by stating the truth in a way where I could do nothing meaningful with it.

>|< >|< >|<

If you have read this far it's time for the funny part.

If you were unaware of the meaning of these things you could say you are not among the intended audience. You could say that even if you were aware! (laugh here)

But that's ok! Neither am, nor was, I! :D (laugh here)

In any case I learned enough to "get the gist" and see the logic. There was no return on my interest (laugh here).

You could say it was irrelevant, though, I would say it is unrelative (laugh here).

That's about "it". You got it!

THA &.


P.S. There are consequences for everything and a price to pay, be sure ;)

the second 2011 is 2010, really

Good gosh sometimes these qwert keyboards and these dumb dumbs i can barely stand it

Why do you want me to exalt you?

I don't, actually. I find it weird that you did. That's why I mentioned it, because I want you to be aware of it so you can perhaps attend to your own sovereignty for a bit.

That includes communicating in your own voice... be it mental, physical, emotional, acoustic or whatever.

If there's any want I maintain in relation to who and what you are, it would be that which I have written in this reply, paragraph 1, sentence 3, part 2, following the word "because".

The rest is fiddlesticks for the amusement of those who understand what it means. It could also be described as Chaos

Why do you think I did?